Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
700HP Blower vs. NA >

700HP Blower vs. NA

Notices

700HP Blower vs. NA

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-18-2011, 03:58 AM
  #11  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank you for the responses. I'm looking at an American Offshore NSX 26 with a 502 and B&M 420 blower. The engine was originally built (setup) by American Offshore I believe in 1996 and had a major rebuild in 2006 adding aluminum heads. The current owner runs 100 octane. The octane requirement is concerning but I've always been a big fan of this boat and it's concept. I'm not sure how do go 100 mph in a single engine boat more safely and economically than this setup.
GoingForBroke is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 06:54 AM
  #12  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 6,639
Received 107 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GoingForBroke
Thank you for the responses. I'm looking at an American Offshore NSX 26 with a 502 and B&M 420 blower. The engine was originally built (setup) by American Offshore I believe in 1996 and had a major rebuild in 2006 adding aluminum heads. The current owner runs 100 octane. The octane requirement is concerning but I've always been a big fan of this boat and it's concept. I'm not sure how do go 100 mph in a single engine boat more safely and economically than this setup.
Sounds like a cool boat. My concern would be running 100 octane. It gets expensive and there arent any places on the water that sell it if you need gas while boating. Maybe he just runs it as a precaution? But at the end of the day,......the blower is bad azz! The blower gets my vote.
kreed is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 08:57 AM
  #13  
Charter Member # 545
Gold Member
 
Beak Boater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Port Tobacco MD/Cape Coral Fl
Posts: 2,152
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

700 H.P. blower motor, easy to build, and will last with routine maintaince. 700 H.P. N/A motor a little more involved. Blower motors tend to make torque at a lower rpm, hence the bad reputation as drive brakers. A N/A motor, will tend to make torque in a higher rpm range.
Both, if making the same h.p. will push the boat the same speed on the top end. IMO the blower boat pulls harder on the low end.
Would check with the owner about the octane fuel he is running. He may be doing it to try to be safe. Unless the 420 blower is making alot of boost, 100 octane seems a bit high. Especially running Aluminum heads.
Beak Boater is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 09:07 AM
  #14  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GoingForBroke
Thank you for the responses. I'm looking at an American Offshore NSX 26 with a 502 and B&M 420 blower. The engine was originally built (setup) by American Offshore I believe in 1996 and had a major rebuild in 2006 adding aluminum heads. The current owner runs 100 octane. The octane requirement is concerning but I've always been a big fan of this boat and it's concept. I'm not sure how do go 100 mph in a single engine boat more safely and economically than this setup.
He is probably running a pulley setup that makes alot of boost. Find out how much PSI of boost he is running, and the engines static compression ratio. We can work off that. Chances are, switching to a larger supercharger pulley and less boost will allow you to run on 93 octane. Most guy go to a aluminum head on a blower motor because it allows for more psi or static compression without detonation, because the aluminum heads dissapate heat better.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 09:59 AM
  #15  
Registered User
Gold Member
 
bcfountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: prince george,va
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default blowers/big cubic inch

i have read all the post here on this topic w/intrest.i have had one blower motor,and a quite a few n/a motors.not one thing was said about gas consumption.....yea,i know you should,nt say that word around performance boat,but i did.heres why.i think a roots stye blowers are hard as hell on fuel.when your not running boost,the blower is useing up h/p.which uses more fuel.i know fuel is the cheaspest part of boating,but when its five dollars @the pump,something to think.i am not dissing blowers ,realy i like them,but as said.if they are not tunend right,they can be not such a good thing.i am no expert by no means.just my 2cent.
bcfountain is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 12:20 PM
  #16  
Registered
Platinum Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Bend Ohio
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
Problem is that people bolt blowers on motors, who have no clue, and fry their engines in 1 hour.

Their is two trains of thoughts on this. Most of it depends on what you have to start with for a base. For example, lets say you have a 502CI merc. To get 700HP N/A out of it, you will need to run really good flowing heads(expensive), 9.5:1 or higher compression, solid roller camshaft with lots of lift and duration, very high valve spring pressures, and probably turn the engine to 6000+RPM to even get close to 700HP.

Or, you can leave the stock 502, put some cometic head gaskets in, a good valve job, a mild hyd roller camshaft, install a blower, and make 700HP.

The blower setup would more than likely last longer, and idle better around the docks. My vote is for blowers, as long as they are properly tuned and setup.
agreed. perfectly said!
Advantage 575 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.