Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Mercury 1350 fuel consumption ? >

Mercury 1350 fuel consumption ?

Notices

Mercury 1350 fuel consumption ?

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-25-2011, 09:26 AM
  #11  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sint maarten
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Adam Younger
Many thanks for the replies

Actually I'm more concerned about tanks sizes and they fit into a boat.

This is for a Marathon racer I'm designing for a client and the fuel capacity and positioning of is a pretty big concern bearing in mind 300nm+ legs

Thanks again
adam,
if you are an engineer and designing a very expensive boat for a client, don't you think you should be using real data from the engine supplier from his BSFC numbers from the dyno work instead of some off the cuff meaningless numbers from a web site forum somewhere ? where are you getting your stress and strain numbers , the sunday comics ?
stevesxm is offline  
Old 11-25-2011, 09:59 AM
  #12  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: west of chitown, il
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevesxm
adam,
if you are an engineer and designing a very expensive boat for a client, don't you think you should be using real data from the engine supplier from his BSFC numbers from the dyno work instead of some off the cuff meaningless numbers from a web site forum somewhere ? where are you getting your stress and strain numbers , the sunday comics ?
Oh no you diiin't!! LOL and a great point
mr3dman is offline  
Old 11-25-2011, 09:59 AM
  #13  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Isle of Wight, United Kingdom
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevesxm
adam,
if you are an engineer and designing a very expensive boat for a client, don't you think you should be using real data from the engine supplier from his BSFC numbers from the dyno work instead of some off the cuff meaningless numbers from a web site forum somewhere ? where are you getting your stress and strain numbers , the sunday comics ?
whats your problem?

I use all the data possible - as it happens Mercury are very lacking in real hard figures as most people in the trade know....
Adam Younger is offline  
Old 11-25-2011, 12:46 PM
  #14  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
onesickpantera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,388
Received 21 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Griff
HP divided by 11-12 will give you reasonably close WOT consumption rates on most engines as long as they are properly tuned.

1350/11=123 GPH
1350/12=112 GPH
X2
onesickpantera is offline  
Old 11-25-2011, 12:55 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
wrinkleface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 8,022
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ezstriper
you're joking right ?? the engine are way over 100k ea and you are wondering about fuel economy...WTF
Actually if I member right, retail 4 a 1350/m8 drive is a bit over 200K!!
wrinkleface is offline  
Old 11-25-2011, 01:31 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
tcelano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JaayTeee
Times that # by two ( for twin engines) Alex..... does that sound more realistic ?

.5#/hr/hp is the rule of thumb.
A BSFC of 0.5 lb/hp/hr should be about right, although it's possible the Merc could do a little better, as it's not having to roll a supercharger. It would be nice if they'd publish the curves. They are readily available for all the diesels I work with.

0.5 * 1350 / 6.5 lb/gal = 104 gal/hr per engine @ wot.

On my dyno runs earlier this year with an 572EFI supercharged setup, we were able to keep the A/F around 12.5-12.7, and get BSCF down to 0.45, until it got up over 4500 rpm. Then it worked its way up to 0.50 at 5900 rpm, but we pushed the A/F down to 12.3 running flat out. This setup kept the EGT's around 1400F.
tcelano is offline  
Old 11-25-2011, 01:53 PM
  #17  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gaylord, Mi
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I thought it was supposed to have about the same economy as a 1200
drpete3 is offline  
Old 11-27-2011, 04:22 AM
  #18  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sint maarten
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Adam Younger
whats your problem?

I use all the data possible - as it happens Mercury are very lacking in real hard figures as most people in the trade know....
if you are the designer and an engineer that didn't get your degree at sears, wouldn't you think to take the real data from the the real engines that you are going to run at the various avg percentage throttle usage for load vs time that you know from real world data acquisition from like types in the past and calculate the area under those curves to get to an answer that was something more than inspired guesswork. ? i mean really... sitting with a clean sheet of paper designing a client boat and you are using off the cuff , non specific data. if you are going to do that and the basis of the question is " what size fuel tanks to run," why not just bypass the question entirely and just run what size fuel tanks everyone else does ?

the object of design is to arrive at an original solution that creates a competetive advantage. that starts with having real data from the engines that are actually going to go in the boat.

the brits would send "engineers" over to work on the race cars. it was a rare occassion when one could justify a conclusion with any genuine calculation or engineering basis. the feeling for the most part was that british airways was giving away engineering degrees on the flights over along with little plastic wing sets to the kids.
stevesxm is offline  
Old 11-27-2011, 01:10 PM
  #19  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Isle of Wight, United Kingdom
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Would be interested to know your background Stevesxm as I'm sorry but I don't know you.

Your messages seem to be more points scoring exercises and actually don't really add up.

I mean "the brits would send "engineers" over to work on the race cars. it was a rare occassion when one could justify a conclusion with any genuine calculation or engineering basis. the feeling for the most part was that british airways was giving away engineering degrees on the flights over along with little plastic wing sets to the kids." ........

The internet can be a great place and a way of sharing information but there can be so much negativity...
Adam Younger is offline  
Old 11-27-2011, 01:57 PM
  #20  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nitrousnolan
If I could afford 1350's I would careless about fuel consumption.
Exactly, well put. Anyone buying 1350s is very wealthy and isn't concerned about gas money..
PokerRun388 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.