Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Gasoline Quality >

Gasoline Quality

Notices

Gasoline Quality

Old 12-23-2011, 05:20 PM
  #21  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Millstadt, IL
Posts: 1,888
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KachinaShadow
The article, below, appeared in BoatUS Magazine...

Three Ethanol Myths Clarified
By Bob Adriance

It's time we get to the bottom of how E10 is affecting our engines

In the few years since ethanol began to be widely used in the United States, a lot has been written about its properties, the problems it's created, and how to best cope with its possible effects. Some of the advice has been based on science, some on hearsay. While E10 is not an ideal fuel – and E15 could cause serious problems for marine engines – at least a few myths about ethanol have arisen with the potential to do more harm than good:



Myth #1: Ethanol-enhanced gasoline (E10) loses octane much faster than regular gasoline.
Many mechanics believe that octane loss during winter storage could be great enough to damage an engine when it's run in the spring. These same mechanics will often recommend leaving the tank almost empty so that fresh gasoline can be added in the spring to raise depleted octane levels. While all gasoline loses octane as it ages, ethanol-enhanced gasoline loses octane at about the same rate as regular gasoline, according to Jim Simnick, a technical advisor at BP Global Fuels Technology, and Lew Gibbs, a senior engineering consultant and Chevron Fellow. The two men have over 75 years of combined experience working with gasoline and both agree that the loss of octane over the winter would not be sufficient to damage an engine. Note, however, to keep any gasoline, including E10, as fresh as possible; they said it's good practice to always add fuel stabilizer — an antioxidant — whenever the boat will be idle for long periods.

The recommendation to leave a tank mostly empty is bad advice; it could significantly increase the amount of water that gets into the tank. When enough water enters through the vent, the ethanol will separate ("phase separate") from the gasoline. Leaving a tank mostly empty does three things to increase the chances of phase separation:

It increases the volume of open space in the tank (its "lung capacity") so it can "breathe in" damaging moist air. An almost-empty tank leaves more space on tank walls for condensation to form. Leaving less gasoline in the tank means there will be less ethanol to absorb the condensation.

It's interesting to note that in areas of the Midwest that have been dealing with E10 for over a decade, topping off tanks is common practice. (As an alternative, completely emptying the tank would eliminate any chance of phase separation.)

If phase separation occurs, the highly corrosive ethanol/water mixture will settle to the bottom of the tank and remain there even after fresh fuel is added in the spring. The only way to remedy the problem would then be to drain the tank and add fresh gasoline. The best way to avoid phase separation over the winter (aside from emptying the tank) is to leave the tank 95-percent full (which allows for expansion) so that there's less moist air in the tank, less space for condensation to collect, and more gasoline to absorb whatever moisture does accumulate.


Myth #2: E10 attracts water, so it's important to install a water separator to prevent the water reaching the engine.
Mercury Marine, which recently hosted a Webinar on ethanol myths, noted that ethanol does not "grab water molecules out of the air." It is hydrophilic, which means ethanol holds water. With regular gasoline (E0) as well at E10, the primary cause of water collecting in tanks is condensation on tank walls. But unlike E0, which can absorb almost no moisture, E10 can hold up to half of one percent of water by volume, and the water molecules will dissolve in the fuel. The "solubilized" water will bypass the water separator and burn harmlessly through the engine. Only if phase separation were to occur would a water separator do its job, but by then the fuel itself would be the problem. The phase-separated water/ethanol mixture would settle on the bottom of the tank near the fuel pick-up and would quickly stall out or even damage your engine. And because ethanol is used to boost octane, the remaining (low-octane) gasoline at the top of the tank would also have the potential to damage your engine.

Note, however, that a fuel filter (10-micron) is essential to keep gunk from reaching your engine. Ethanol is a solvent that dissolves resins, rust, and dirt that have accumulated on older tank walls. Especially when you first make the transition to E10, it's important to carry spare filters and a galvanized bucket to store used filters prior to disposal. Even in new engines and tanks, E10 will sometimes form a mysterious gooey substance that will also clog filters. Richard Kolb, the manager of Emissions and Regulations for Volvo Penta, believes the goo is caused by water mixing with one or more of the 108 approved compounds that can be used in gasoline. These compounds vary among suppliers, so one solution is to change to a different brand of gasoline. Another is to use carburetor cleaner, which he says has sometimes remedied the problem.


Myth #3: Certain additives can prevent phase separation?
Both Gibbs and Simnick said that the additives that eliminate water may work incrementally to protect against phase separation, but Joe Simnick stressed that no additives will stand up to a good slug of water. Lew Gibbs added that the best way to prevent phase separation in E10 is to "keep it dry, keep it dry, keep it dry." That means keeping the tank filled to prevent condensation. Mercury Marine has also noted that, contrary to statements made by some companies that produce fuel additives, there are no additives that can make stale or phase-separated gasoline usable.

E10 is certainly not as trouble-free as E0, especially the first few tankfulls. But for newer engines, those built after about 1991, there's no reason the initial problems can't be overcome. No less an authority than Mercury Marine says, "After the transition period from E0, E10 may actually be a superior marine fuel as it tends to keep low levels of water moving through the fuel system, keeping the
system 'dry.'"

Bob Adriance is Editor of Seaworthy, the BoatUS Marine Insurance damage-avoidance publication, and author of Seaworthy, Essential Lessons of Things Gone Wrong (published by International Marine/McGraw Hill, available at www.Amazon.com and major bookstores).
That article is CRAP, fuel companies trying to cover there ass and avoid law suits. Independant studies show different results. After my engine blew up due to bad fuel I know better now.
jeffswav is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 08:19 PM
  #22  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Castaic CA
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Might as well throw this in to the mix to (also from BoatUS Magazine)...

Mercury Debunks More Ethanol Myths

Mercury Marine, the world's largest manufacturer of marine engines, recently held a webinar to debunk some of its own myths about ethanol. I attended with interest. The first myth was that there are fuel additives that can prevent all issues associated with ethanol-blended gasoline. For example, no fuel additive can prevent ethanol from acting like a solvent. The second myth was that fuel additives can make stale or phase-separated fuel useable. "Fuel cannot be rejuvenated," Mercury determined, and they noted that it's a myth that ethanol-blended fuels are bad and should be avoided. Here are some quotes from the Mercury Marine webinar.

"There is no active transfer mechanism for ethanol molecules to reach out and 'grab' water molecules out of the air. Under normal storage conditions, even in a vented fuel tank, it just does not happen at a level or rate that is relevant."

"Major multi-billion dollar companies with enormous resources have improved gasoline additives but there have been no recent breakthroughs involving 'magical technology.' Claims made by companies about 'space-age,' 'revolutionary,' or special proprietary technology should be looked at with a high degree of suspicion."

"E10 Ethanol absolutely IS an acceptable fuel for everyday use."

"E15 Ethanol absolutely IS NOT an acceptable fuel."

"After the transition period from E0, E10 may actually be a superior marine fuel as it tends to keep low levels of water moving through the fuel system, keeping the system 'dry.'"

"Don't immediately assume E10 is the problem."

Bob Adriance
KachinaShadow is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 09:09 PM
  #23  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Castaic CA
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Raylar
I am not saying ethanol blended fuel is useless or damaging in all uses, I am just not sure its the best fuel for marine usage period!
I agree with you 100% Ray! But unfortunately it looks like E0 fuel is becoming a thing of the past and we are going to have to learn to deal with whatever comes along whether it be E10 or something even more bizzare.
I think we can all learn from each other what preventative measures actually work and what doesn't. As long as everyone keeps an OPEN MIND and doesn't go blaming E10 fuel everytime their motor farts or for everything that goes wrong with their fuel system. Boats have been notorious for fuel system issues long before we ever heard of E10, so the "old gas" and "water" issues are nothing new but it does seem as if EVERYTHING is now being blamed on E10 when, in fact, there's probably a good portion of the problems that plagued us before E10, which are not E10 related.
Like you say, E10 is not perfect and does have it's share of issues that need to be worked out. So we'll just have to learn to deal with it and make it work because it's not going to go away.
KachinaShadow is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 10:18 PM
  #24  
Gold Member
Gold Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Randy Nielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Omaha Ne
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

T500HPS, the fuel stations where I fuel my boat do not have stickers on the 87 oct pumps like the 89 oct do but to be honest I wouldnt know what is actually coming out of the nozzle without having it tested. Randy
Randy Nielsen is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 10:33 PM
  #25  
Registered
 
racinfever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: cincinnati ohio
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by jeffswav
That article is CRAP, fuel companies trying to cover there ass and avoid law suits. Independant studies show different results. After my engine blew up due to bad fuel I know better now.
+1
racinfever is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 10:41 PM
  #26  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Thousand Islands area
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KachinaShadow
I agree with you 100% Ray! But unfortunately it looks like E0 fuel is becoming a thing of the past and we are going to have to learn to deal with whatever comes along whether it be E10 or something even more bizzare.
I think we can all learn from each other what preventative measures actually work and what doesn't. As long as everyone keeps an OPEN MIND and doesn't go blaming E10 fuel everytime their motor farts or for everything that goes wrong with their fuel system. Boats have been notorious for fuel system issues long before we ever heard of E10, so the "old gas" and "water" issues are nothing new but it does seem as if EVERYTHING is now being blamed on E10 when, in fact, there's probably a good portion of the problems that plagued us before E10, which are not E10 related.
Like you say, E10 is not perfect and does have it's share of issues that need to be worked out. So we'll just have to learn to deal with it and make it work because it's not going to go away.
whats the difference in marine engiens and cars??
soldier4402 is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 11:26 PM
  #27  
21 and 42 footers
Platinum Member
 
t500hps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 8,183
Received 119 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Randy Nielsen
T500HPS, the fuel stations where I fuel my boat do not have stickers on the 87 oct pumps like the 89 oct do but to be honest I wouldnt know what is actually coming out of the nozzle without having it tested. Randy
There is no difference here between 87, 89, and 93.......all E10.
t500hps is offline  
Old 12-24-2011, 12:33 AM
  #28  
Gold Member
Gold Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Randy Nielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Omaha Ne
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If Merc & Volvos info is correct then we all should be sending our repair bills to the oil companies,That should make a difference in their record quarterly profits huh?
Randy Nielsen is offline  
Old 12-24-2011, 12:42 AM
  #29  
Gold Member
Gold Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Randy Nielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Omaha Ne
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

soldier4402, car engines are built on an assembly line & do not suffer the continued abuse of high rpm operation for long lengths of time, Take a car engine (350-454) whatever run it at 4-5000rpm & see how long it lasts, Do the same with an identical boat engine I rest my case.Randy
Randy Nielsen is offline  
Old 12-24-2011, 12:51 AM
  #30  
Gold Member
Gold Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Randy Nielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Omaha Ne
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry I didnt add this with my last post, Case in point my corvette z06 will run as far as I have had it 165mph with more to go, the same engine marinized sells in ski boats & wont even come close to that speed even though they are hand built engines, water has far more density than iar & asphalt.
Randy Nielsen is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.