TRS vs BRAVO
#21
Registered
iTrader: (1)
No need to re-rig to a lesser drive, Konrad's 540PRS is a direct bolt-on unit designed to replace the TRS. It's 1.7" shorter from input shaft to prop shaft. This increase in propshaft height typically results in gains of 3-5 mph when compared to the TRS. 7 qts gear lube capacity, rated to handle up to 800hp.
#24
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Dover DE
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With your motors sitting 2 foot forward, 3 inches higher, 200 more weight, more hydrodynamic drag, and needing an extra 100 ponies. Yea I would say even if a TRS could somehow hold 150 more hp than a bravo it would need more than that to equal to performance.
#25
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Yes, there's speed to be gained, Bravo to TRS but most gain is from the ingrease in propshaft height with the Bravo being about 2.5" shorter than a TRS.
Swapping from TRS to Bravo is a huge undertaking with the end result, a weaker drive.
#27
Registered
No need to re-rig to a lesser drive, Konrad's 540PRS is a direct bolt-on unit designed to replace the TRS. It's 1.7" shorter from input shaft to prop shaft. This increase in propshaft height typically results in gains of 3-5 mph when compared to the TRS. 7 qts gear lube capacity, rated to handle up to 800hp.
#30
Registered
VIP Member
The trs is 2.5 iches longer like biggus said..But you do shed alot of weight I would say about 275/300 per side. The trans alone is about 125/150. I have done the conversion a bunch of times and every time a big difference in performance..two of them were mine. One was a 27 excalibur with the same motor and the x was 19.5 with the trs when i converted it to bravo I set it at 19 and i gained a best of 7 MPH. Boat ran a best of 80 with the trs and that was only once, then when a did a bravo 87 MPH and that was a bunch of times... My 10 meter I gained 6 mph and the boat handles way better. If you can do it yourself I would do it. A bravo boat will sell alot easier than a trs.. Just my 2 cents