Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
TRS vs BRAVO >

TRS vs BRAVO

Notices

TRS vs BRAVO

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-30-2012, 05:53 PM
  #21  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Biggus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Naples, Maine
Posts: 6,304
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

No need to re-rig to a lesser drive, Konrad's 540PRS is a direct bolt-on unit designed to replace the TRS. It's 1.7" shorter from input shaft to prop shaft. This increase in propshaft height typically results in gains of 3-5 mph when compared to the TRS. 7 qts gear lube capacity, rated to handle up to 800hp.
Attached Thumbnails TRS vs BRAVO-konrad-kurt-prs-img_0007_large_.jpg  
Biggus is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 06:29 PM
  #22  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
lucky strike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida
Posts: 8,962
Received 482 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

Bravo drives belong on a house boat... Listen to Biggus you can't go wrong
lucky strike is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 06:45 PM
  #23  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Biggus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Naples, Maine
Posts: 6,304
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lucky strike
Bravo drives belong on a house boat... Listen to Biggus you can't go wrong
Thanks Steve -See you in Miami!
Biggus is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 06:58 PM
  #24  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Dover DE
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With your motors sitting 2 foot forward, 3 inches higher, 200 more weight, more hydrodynamic drag, and needing an extra 100 ponies. Yea I would say even if a TRS could somehow hold 150 more hp than a bravo it would need more than that to equal to performance.
charliem is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 07:12 PM
  #25  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Biggus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Naples, Maine
Posts: 6,304
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by charliem
With your motors sitting 2 foot forward, 3 inches higher, 200 more weight, more hydrodynamic drag, and needing an extra 100 ponies. Yea I would say even if a TRS could somehow hold 150 more hp than a bravo it would need more than that to equal to performance.
No need to exaggerate. TRS applications are about 10" further forward compared to Bravo. X-dimention is about the same, TRS were installed deep. TRS is heavier by about 120 lbs. Trans are 1:1, other than a small pump and viscous drag, there's not much loss. BAM calculates a 72C at about 12-15 hp.

Yes, there's speed to be gained, Bravo to TRS but most gain is from the ingrease in propshaft height with the Bravo being about 2.5" shorter than a TRS.

Swapping from TRS to Bravo is a huge undertaking with the end result, a weaker drive.
Biggus is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 07:18 PM
  #26  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Dover DE
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Trs, transmission, whatever parts are way more than 120 lb heavier. TRS is 3 inches longer. Hydrodynamics have to be worth a bunch.
charliem is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 07:25 PM
  #27  
Registered
 
BDiggity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Palm Bay FL
Posts: 1,801
Received 33 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Biggus
No need to re-rig to a lesser drive, Konrad's 540PRS is a direct bolt-on unit designed to replace the TRS. It's 1.7" shorter from input shaft to prop shaft. This increase in propshaft height typically results in gains of 3-5 mph when compared to the TRS. 7 qts gear lube capacity, rated to handle up to 800hp.
i liked your 540's so much i had my TRS's painted to match. Hopefully one of these years i can have the real deal

BDiggity is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 07:26 PM
  #28  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Biggus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Naples, Maine
Posts: 6,304
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BDiggity
i liked your 540's so much i had my TRS's painted to match. Hopefully one of these years i can have the real deal

Nice job!
Biggus is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 08:10 PM
  #29  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sandown, NH - Sebago Lake Region, ME
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BDiggity
i liked your 540's so much i had my TRS's painted to match. Hopefully one of these years i can have the real deal


X2

502ss is offline  
Old 01-31-2012, 07:26 AM
  #30  
Registered
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The trs is 2.5 iches longer like biggus said..But you do shed alot of weight I would say about 275/300 per side. The trans alone is about 125/150. I have done the conversion a bunch of times and every time a big difference in performance..two of them were mine. One was a 27 excalibur with the same motor and the x was 19.5 with the trs when i converted it to bravo I set it at 19 and i gained a best of 7 MPH. Boat ran a best of 80 with the trs and that was only once, then when a did a bravo 87 MPH and that was a bunch of times... My 10 meter I gained 6 mph and the boat handles way better. If you can do it yourself I would do it. A bravo boat will sell alot easier than a trs.. Just my 2 cents
excalibur82 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.