Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
TRS vs BRAVO >

TRS vs BRAVO

Notices

TRS vs BRAVO

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-29-2012, 02:55 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Lake Ozark, MO
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default TRS vs BRAVO

I have a 79' Scarab with TRS drives thinking maybe going to BRAVO drives. What are the PROs and CONs of the switch??
BadBoy is offline  
Old 01-29-2012, 03:03 PM
  #2  
Registered
iTrader: (28)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA/MD
Posts: 2,497
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Pros:

Better hydrodynamics
no transmission to worry about
a little more power handling ability
less weight
more parts availability


Cons:

Cost
engines need moved or long drive shafts added to bravos
Baja226sport is offline  
Old 01-29-2012, 03:04 PM
  #3  
VIP Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: East Greenwich, RI
Posts: 937
Received 75 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

All kinds on info on this topic in threads.... Here's a search of TRS and Bravo in the titles:

Search Results
242LS is offline  
Old 01-29-2012, 04:17 PM
  #4  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Dighton MA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Konrads are on sale
soggy bottom is offline  
Old 01-29-2012, 04:28 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Bravos are not considered as strong as TRS thats what most people agree on. I personally dont see any point in changing to a bravo its a sideways trade that costs a lot and is a lot of work.

Of course there are reasons people like the bravo's... they are easier to work on if you ask me because if you blow a tranny with TRS the motor has to come out. Bravos will gain you some speed from what i hear and also there will be no power lost because of the transmission not being 100% efficient.

Changing to bravo would be a good idea if you are updating your whole boat.. example if you put a new transom in then you should go ahead and do it because the TRS is outdated and while its not hard to get parts now in 10 years it probably will be.
sparky24 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Boostedbigblockboat (01-18-2022)
Old 01-29-2012, 04:37 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: central IL
Posts: 1,126
Received 155 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BadBoy
I have a 79' Scarab with TRS drives thinking maybe going to BRAVO drives. What are the PROs and CONs of the switch??
Just curious... You didn't happen to buy your boat up by Chicago did you?

Originally Posted by catalyst.
Bravos are not considered as strong as TRS thats what most people agree on. I personally dont see any point in changing to a bravo its a sideways trade that costs a lot and is a lot of work.

Of course there are reasons people like the bravo's... they are easier to work on if you ask me because if you blow a tranny with TRS the motor has to come out. Bravos will gain you some speed from what i hear and also there will be no power lost because of the transmission not being 100% efficient.

Changing to bravo would be a good idea if you are updating your whole boat.. example if you put a new transom in then you should go ahead and do it because the TRS is outdated and while its not hard to get parts now in 10 years it probably will be.
I agree 100%
Plowtownmissile is offline  
Old 01-29-2012, 04:45 PM
  #7  
Registered
iTrader: (28)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA/MD
Posts: 2,497
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by catalyst.
Bravos are not considered as strong as TRS.
Most everyone I have talked to on the subject says TRS are not good over 400hp...??? Is this not correct?

Just wondering.
Baja226sport is offline  
Old 01-29-2012, 04:49 PM
  #8  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
cigrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Endicott, NY
Posts: 2,576
Received 159 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

I would not say that Bravo's are stronger. Especially on an older hull that is heavy. I don't think you would see considerable changes in speed. You are also talking about a big project. Transom, engine movement. Not to mention how are the ride characteristics going to change in the boat. That boat was designed to have the weight and balance of the transmissions in the back. You can still pick up spare TRS's pretty cheep and unless you have 600+ HP they are pretty much bullet proof. Plus they shift so much nicer then bravo's. I am sure others will chime in, but a 1000 threads on this same topic exist. Good luck
cigrocket is offline  
Old 01-29-2012, 04:51 PM
  #9  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
cigrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Endicott, NY
Posts: 2,576
Received 159 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Baja226sport
Most everyone I have talked to on the subject says TRS are not good over 400hp...??? Is this not correct?

Just wondering.
Not true. I ran 675HP for 100 hours on TRS. Just changed the oil and that was on a heavy cigarette mistress. I then converted the boat to Konrads.
cigrocket is offline  
Old 01-29-2012, 05:18 PM
  #10  
Registered
iTrader: (28)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA/MD
Posts: 2,497
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Hmmm....I did not realize. I actually DIDN'T buy a really, really nice fountiain 10 meter a few years back just because of the TRS set up.

The broker on the boat told me that the power in it (about 500 a side) was to much for those drives.
Baja226sport is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.