Remove Mercruiser catalyst
#11
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Haxby!
You 'da man!! Thank you very much. That was just what I was looking for! Have you used this yet? I think you are right about saving the time.
Has anybody out there tried it?
Thank you again, man!
You 'da man!! Thank you very much. That was just what I was looking for! Have you used this yet? I think you are right about saving the time.
Has anybody out there tried it?
Thank you again, man!
#12
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sint maarten
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The amount of time it saves you might be worth the extra $$..
http://www.cpperformance.com/p-16709...-computer.aspx
http://www.cpperformance.com/p-16709...-computer.aspx
#14
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Nevada, IA
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is a MUCH cheaper and simpler "plug and play" solution.
http://www.afterthoughtsauto.com/o2sim.html
I would not mess with a plug in computer that adjusts fueling curves by modifying the O2 sensor readings...this simple solution above simply tricks the ECM that the Cat is still there.
http://www.afterthoughtsauto.com/o2sim.html
I would not mess with a plug in computer that adjusts fueling curves by modifying the O2 sensor readings...this simple solution above simply tricks the ECM that the Cat is still there.
Last edited by Drivehard; 05-08-2012 at 08:37 AM.
#15
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is a MUCH cheaper and simpler "plug and play" solution.
http://www.afterthoughtsauto.com/o2sim.html
I would not mess with a plug in computer that adjusts fueling curves by modifying the O2 sensor readings...this simple solution above simply tricks the ECM that the Cat is still there.
http://www.afterthoughtsauto.com/o2sim.html
I would not mess with a plug in computer that adjusts fueling curves by modifying the O2 sensor readings...this simple solution above simply tricks the ECM that the Cat is still there.
I like the one from CP Performance because it is made for marine products.
Drivehard - How do you know that it adjusts the fueling? I don't see why it would need to.
#16
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Looks like the CPPerformance Maxvolt system may be the part for bypassing the system if it works with the Mercury ECM programming. CP can tell you that.
However, be careful here. check your engines warranty carefully. The new catalyst marine engine emmission systems are required by law to carry a three year warranty and it also has a bearing on the standard engine warranty. Not sure how yours is affected but if you have a warranty issue. If you have modified your exhaust and engine in any way your warranty is out the WINDOW!. Just a thought.
As for additional power I would like to see an actual dyno report on the 10-15HP gained from this system, what size engine etc. If you really get 10-15 HP on a small block that might represent 1 mph on your boats performance? NOt a lot so consider that before you go just changing exhaust or disconnecting this system.
You might be better of just considering the addition off muffler bearings or the alternator phase shift capacitors !?
Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
However, be careful here. check your engines warranty carefully. The new catalyst marine engine emmission systems are required by law to carry a three year warranty and it also has a bearing on the standard engine warranty. Not sure how yours is affected but if you have a warranty issue. If you have modified your exhaust and engine in any way your warranty is out the WINDOW!. Just a thought.
As for additional power I would like to see an actual dyno report on the 10-15HP gained from this system, what size engine etc. If you really get 10-15 HP on a small block that might represent 1 mph on your boats performance? NOt a lot so consider that before you go just changing exhaust or disconnecting this system.
You might be better of just considering the addition off muffler bearings or the alternator phase shift capacitors !?
Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
#17
Registered
Platinum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is a MUCH cheaper and simpler "plug and play" solution.
http://www.afterthoughtsauto.com/o2sim.html
I would not mess with a plug in computer that adjusts fueling curves by modifying the O2 sensor readings...this simple solution above simply tricks the ECM that the Cat is still there.
http://www.afterthoughtsauto.com/o2sim.html
I would not mess with a plug in computer that adjusts fueling curves by modifying the O2 sensor readings...this simple solution above simply tricks the ECM that the Cat is still there.
#18
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The rest of the story
Hi Ray,
I have tried polishing out muffler bearings before, but they just don't shine like a nice set of headers! You have helped me realize that a few horsepower may be nice, but what I really want is a better looking exhaust system. Thank you for making me think!
Haxby - What I have since learned about the Mercruiser catalyst system is that all of them run closed loop and it is self contained in the one engine controller. The part from Afterthought Auto will NOT work on vehicles later than 2003 because the engine computer does a test on the catalyst. I don't no what the test is, but the part from CP Performance runs the test as well as some other things that I did not pick up on.
Who is going to be the first to report on this device? Me?
I have tried polishing out muffler bearings before, but they just don't shine like a nice set of headers! You have helped me realize that a few horsepower may be nice, but what I really want is a better looking exhaust system. Thank you for making me think!
Haxby - What I have since learned about the Mercruiser catalyst system is that all of them run closed loop and it is self contained in the one engine controller. The part from Afterthought Auto will NOT work on vehicles later than 2003 because the engine computer does a test on the catalyst. I don't no what the test is, but the part from CP Performance runs the test as well as some other things that I did not pick up on.
Who is going to be the first to report on this device? Me?
#19
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Nevada, IA
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The ad for the above site says that it does not work with the later vehicles (only up to 2003), so I doubt it works with the Mercruiser stuff. Also, I don't know if it will plug in.
I like the one from CP Performance because it is made for marine products.
Drivehard - How do you know that it adjusts the fueling? I don't see why it would need to.
I like the one from CP Performance because it is made for marine products.
Drivehard - How do you know that it adjusts the fueling? I don't see why it would need to.
Why would you have an O2 sensor pre-cat and not run closed loop? That seems odd to me...unless it is there only to compare values pre and post cat. Wow...that is a lot of cost just to monitor that the cat is there and functioning.
Maybe I am way of base here...but if I understand how the system works, this is what I believe is happening.
To answer the question about fueling...if I read the directions correctly, it is only making three connections PER SIDE of the engine.
One to the ECM side of the second O2 sensor
One to the sensor side of the first O2
One to the ECM side of the first 02 sensor
So...the connection to the ECM side of the second O2 sensor is simply to trick the ECM into thinking the second O2 sensor is getting the correct readings that the cat is still there. That sensor is no longer needed though...
The second two connections basically "condition" what signal from the primary O2 sensor that the ECM is seeing. The ONLY thing that little box can send to the ECM on that wire is the air to fuel ratio. It can not change anything else. So what I believe is happening is that the box is telling the ECM that the engine is running slightly lean from where it is really running...which makes the ECM dump slightly more fuel into the mix.
If the primary O2 sensor is not used for closed loop operation...I would call total BS that the box could effect operation AT ALL...other than to keep it from throwing a code.
#20
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Nevada, IA
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not sure if it's changed but when I went to Merc school a couple years ago for the catalyst engines they were not running closed loop. There is a separate computer monitoring the exhaust /emissions system and it can talk to the engine ecm but it is not altering the fuel curve based on lambda readings. I would guess the MaxVolt deal just tricks the ecm into thinking the O2's are still there and doing their thing.