Swapping out my quadrajet for a holley 4160 or 4150 carb ''CARB GUYS COME ON IN''
#1
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Swapping out my quadrajet for a holley 4160 or 4150 carb ''CARB GUYS COME ON IN''
iam swapping out my quadrajet carb for a holley 4150 or 4160 carb but have a couple questions. my boat is a 22' century with a mercruiser, the engine is a small block chevy 355 cubic inches, have a comp cams marine flat tappet camshaft, 10to1 compression, eagle crank, eagle rods, keith black hyperutetic pistons, 2.02/ 1.60 cable hump heads, gm performance cast iron intake, and a alpha one gen II v8 outdrive i beilve its 1.50 ratio?, so now thats i told you about my engine a little, help me decide what carb to purchase and or build and marineize my own 4150 or 4160 carb, i do know that the 4160 only has one metering block on one size and the 4150 have 2 metering blocks and more tuneability, also i dont what a huge carb cus theres no reason for it so iam looking at 600-650 cfm, now when i do decide on a carb, what size jets should i start off with, how many cc accelerator pumps to install, should i have vaccum secondarys or mechanical secondarys, duel feed inlet or single feed inlet, j tubes installed, and throttle linkage bracket? just wanted to get pointed in the right direction, any info is apprciated thanks matt...
#4
Chevy-Harley fan
Charter Member
Mechanical 650 double pumper would be cheap & easy to find. If not a marine one you can buy J tubes. I would change to a square bore intake. Nothing wrong with a good working Q-Jet though. Good Luck
__________________
Pete
Pete
#5
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well if its to much work to marineize regular holley carb, iam looking at the 4150 part# 0-80559 w/mechanical secondarys or the 4160 part# 0-80551 with vacuum secondarys, what yall think?
#6
Personally, I think the Q-jets get a bad rep just because so few people really know how to tune them. I will say this - once you get one set up, they are rock solid, trouble free, and for an application like yours can deliver just as much cfm (and power) as a Holley, and probably do it more efficiently. I ran a Q-jet for years on my warmed over 454, and it never gave me any trouble. I just had to change to a set of fatter metering rods and main jets to richen it up a little, and off I went. I miss those days now, as I am having to mess with the Holley that I am running a bit more than the Q-jet. Why did I switch? because I stepped up to a 489 with a much more aggressive cam and AFR heads. A Q-jet just couldn't feed it without major mods that are beyond my capability.
IMO, if you HAVE to run a Holley, there are plenty of square bore 715 and 750 CFM marine versions out there, or you may want to go with a spread bore Holley. I have a 715 cfm marine Holley that needs a kit that I would let go for a very reasonable price. Good luck!
IMO, if you HAVE to run a Holley, there are plenty of square bore 715 and 750 CFM marine versions out there, or you may want to go with a spread bore Holley. I have a 715 cfm marine Holley that needs a kit that I would let go for a very reasonable price. Good luck!
#7
Registered
#8
Monte, honestly for a 355 small block with GM heads and (I assume) stock Merc exhaust, I think you will see little if any performance gain by switching to a Holley or even an Edelbrock. If the Q-jet is running OK and not giving you driveability issues, I would leave well enough alone. If you are a tinkerer (like most of us here), and just want to play around with different combo's, then go for it, but I think it may turn out to be a waste of time and money. Now if you were running a stroker with good aftermarket heads and performance exhaust that really needs to breathe, then that would be a different matter.
The fact that you are running 10:1 CR with stock iron heads and hyper pistons concerns me. In a car, this would be just fine, but a marine environment puts everything under much more extreme loads. Couple that with the questionable gas that is often available on the water, and you could find yourself with a detonation issue, which could be disastrous for those hyper pistons. At the very least, err on the side of caution when jetting a different carb, and make sure you are running at least 91 octane fuel at all times. Also, be careful not to overprop this boat - that too can lead to detonation. Much better to run a lower pitch prop and let it wind out a bit.
The fact that you are running 10:1 CR with stock iron heads and hyper pistons concerns me. In a car, this would be just fine, but a marine environment puts everything under much more extreme loads. Couple that with the questionable gas that is often available on the water, and you could find yourself with a detonation issue, which could be disastrous for those hyper pistons. At the very least, err on the side of caution when jetting a different carb, and make sure you are running at least 91 octane fuel at all times. Also, be careful not to overprop this boat - that too can lead to detonation. Much better to run a lower pitch prop and let it wind out a bit.
#9
GMHD, I was under the impression that the GM Performance cast iron manifold he is running has a dual pattern flange on it. If so, this might keep him from having to swap the intake.