Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Cam suggestions for 383 build >

Cam suggestions for 383 build

Notices

Cam suggestions for 383 build

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-03-2014, 05:05 PM
  #31  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ocala, Fl
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Any time you truthfully reveal what you have done...there are always critics. Bottom line...all things considered I'm happy with what I have and it performs very well.
sprink58 is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 06:26 PM
  #32  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,539
Received 3,110 Likes on 1,401 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Panther
Interesting setup, it's similar to what I put together in some aspects.

Anyone care to guess what it will make? Below are specs;
Sure. I'll take a stab it.

It will be much faster if you're wife is driving it.
SB is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 06:38 PM
  #33  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,165
Received 110 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 38special
A lot of useful information from all of you, thanks. Is your engine loud all the time? I'd love to hear the engine loud but not all the time. I'm pretty green on terminology but could I run a cam like the 276 comp and quiet the engine when wanted or is that getting into a lot of expense? I need to get this project done before my 12 and 14 year olds are grown. My old job is gone that let me spend what ever I wanted on toys and I'm tempted to buy a mild hyd roller just to get it done and get everyone out fishing and skiing. It just seems a shame as well built as the motor is.
Loud is a relative term. Several factors come into play with 'loudness' in my boat. If the bimini top is up the boat is perceived to be louder inside the boat since the sound waves are bouncing off the water, up and into the bimini top reflected inside. Obviously the true dB reading aft of the boat remains virtually unchanged. I don't have readings for the current motor, but stock Merc 350 Mag with Rex Marine Sound Selector system was about 82 dB at idle, cutouts closed and if I remember about 86 dB with the cutouts open. New motor has more bark, but I haven't pulled the meter out to measure it and I only have straight through hull.

I can, and have run inline silencers and they do cut the dB by about 6-8 but also choke down the top end rpm by 300-500 so I almost always leave them out. With a milder cam you may not have that problem. There are several exhaust cut-out systems available which can also give you some sound options, but they should be avoided when cams get more aggressive since the butterfly valves diverting the exhaust down the Y-pipe when running closed can exacerbate potential reversion issues with performance cams. They also add expense. $600-800 just for the system, not including additional exhaust hose, thru hull tips, and the labor required to cut the holes.

To answer your question, I would be hesitant to run the Comp 276 with a diverter type exhaust system.
Trash is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 08:36 PM
  #34  
Geronimo36
Gold Member
 
Panther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 11,972
Received 131 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SB
Sure. I'll take a stab it.

It will be much faster if you're wife is driving it.
Definitely faster when the wife drives it. After all, this one is hers.
Panther is offline  
Old 03-04-2014, 01:42 AM
  #35  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SB
FYI:
I did a top end on a high hour 350 Mag (260HP) in a 20ft boat (really 19ft) and about 2800lbs.
218/224 at .050" / 113LSA Comp Extreme EFI HR cam
180cc heads
Weiand Air Strike (like the Eddy Air Gap)
650 Vac BG Carb
Eddie Marine Exhaust Manifolds (already on boat)
Merc Alpha Outdrive

15mph increase was result. NO BS. I'm intimate with that boat. LOL.

It's also an animal planing if at WOT - so....that needs to be held back to take care of outdrive.

Reason why I mention above is that you have same size and near same weight boat + a bigger engine. Heads are pretty much the same performance wise.

So, even if you go a little smaller on cam, it should still be an animal compared to whatever was stock. Just remember what we said top rpm will be as far as best speed. That 212 at .050" cam from Comp will probably be 4600 rpm.
That does sound like my boat. The 305 was missing when I bought the boat but most everything was still in it. I guess for the time being i'll look for a cam that is a step above what would have been in a 5.7 I can swap later if I still want. What kind of HP is a sx cobra duo prop good for? Am I going the wrong direction again thinking about comps XM270 ? Advertised at 5200rpm or is it doable through the stock leg?

Last edited by 38special; 03-04-2014 at 11:46 AM.
38special is offline  
Old 03-04-2014, 06:11 AM
  #36  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kissimmee, Fl.
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sprink58
Any time you truthfully reveal what you have done...there are always critics. Bottom line...all things considered I'm happy with what I have and it performs very well.
Exactly. As long as your happy that's all that counts.
CC230 is offline  
Old 03-04-2014, 11:09 AM
  #37  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is this cam doable in my 383 exhausting through the stock leg and would it actually reach the advertised rpm? What kind of hp and tq numbers could I expect from it?

Lunati 20080720 (Formerly Part Number 60120) Chevrolet Small Block LT1, LT4, & 1987-Present Hydraulic Roller Voodoo Camshaft RPM Range 1600 - 5600 Lift .507"/.515" [email protected] 211/219 LSA/IAC 112/106
Excellent choice for stock to mildly modified engines, works well with OEM style injection, great inboard/outboard marine cam for economy and sking. Good mileage and torque increase.



RPM Range: 1600 - 5600
Lift with 1.6 Rocker: .507"/.515"
Duration @ .050": 211/219
Advertised Duration: 262/270
LSA/IAC: 112/106
Valve Lash: Hyd/Hyd
Cam & Lifter Kit: 20080720LK
Complete Kit: 20080720K
Lifters: 72910-16
Springs: 73943-16
Retainers: 75742-16
Locks: 77003-16
Valve Spring Kit: 73943K1
Valve Seals: 78501-16
Timing Set: 93026
Pushrods: 5040-16
Rocker Arms: 85340-16
38special is offline  
Old 03-04-2014, 12:07 PM
  #38  
MarineKinetics
Platinum Member
 
rmbuilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

38
You will likely incur pumping losses (both intake and exhaust) that will inhibit you from reaching 5600 RPM. It will be beneficial to address your exhaust lobe due to the downstream restriction the log manifolds present. The displacement has increased ~9% from the original spec, increasing the spent charge proportionally. I would suggest increasing intake duration, reducing your exhaust bias (from the new intake lobe) to: (1º-4º) It will also benefit you to pay close attention to your ECL.

Bob
rmbuilder is offline  
Old 03-04-2014, 12:49 PM
  #39  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rmbuilder
38
You will likely incur pumping losses (both intake and exhaust) that will inhibit you from reaching 5600 RPM. It will be beneficial to address your exhaust lobe due to the downstream restriction the log manifolds present. The displacement has increased ~9% from the original spec, increasing the spent charge proportionally. I would suggest increasing intake duration, reducing your exhaust bias (from the new intake lobe) to: (1º-4º) It will also benefit you to pay close attention to your ECL.

Bob
If I give ya a hundred down would you help make this problem go away rmbuilder?

Or suggest an off the shelf cam that will let me get the most from this 383 that I can exhausting through the stock leg?

Last edited by 38special; 03-04-2014 at 12:55 PM.
38special is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 12:37 PM
  #40  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have been offered a brand new hyd roller cam and roller lifters a long with new roller rocker arms, chain and gears. valve springs push rods from a 325 HP 5.7 mercruiser that is being reworked for opposite rotation. He is asking $375 for everything. I can't hardly turn that down. Will my 383 gain or lose running that hyd roller cam? Pretty sure he said it was a duel pattern cam. He also said the cam is a 5,000rpm cam. Everything is for my same year engine, a 98.

Last edited by 38special; 03-05-2014 at 02:04 PM.
38special is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.