Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
How is compression ratio figured? >

How is compression ratio figured?

Notices

How is compression ratio figured?

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-10-2014, 09:38 AM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: OK CIty, OK
Posts: 1,449
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default How is compression ratio figured?

I was playing with some numbers the other day and something intrigued me.

Per the manual, a 502mag should have a cold cranking pressure of 150psig (164.7psia, imagine we're testing in the Keys) and a compression ratio of 8.75. However, 14.7*8.75 does not equal 164.7, it's 128.6.

Something else must be taken into account here, so what is it?
Cole2534 is offline  
Old 11-10-2014, 10:18 AM
  #2  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Taunton Ma
Posts: 8,527
Received 698 Likes on 341 Posts
Default

Cranking compression and compression ratio have very little to do with each other. Valve timing events have much more of an effect. Same engine with different cams can have 140-190 cranking compression.
Compression ratio is the volume of a cylinder at bdc, versus total combustion chamber volume at tdc.
Unlimited jd is offline  
Old 11-10-2014, 10:22 AM
  #3  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Cam timing, altitude, and static compression, . Specifically, when the intake valve closes.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 11-10-2014, 10:29 AM
  #4  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

The later the intake valve closing point, with all other things being equal (Static compression, altitude, rod length), the lower the cranking pressure. Hence why, lets say you have a stock 502 mag with stock cam. you may get 150psi. Now, throw in a more radical cam, like with an intake valve that closes at 56*, it may fall to 135psi. To get cranking psi back up, you'd raise the static compression up to say 9.5:1.

This is why, cam choice and compression ratio, go together. Too radical of a cam, with not enough static compression, leads to a soggy turd until the engine speed can catch up. At low RPM, there is simply more time, for the cylinder pressure to bleed off. As rpm increases, that bleed time is reduced, and the engine starts to come alive.

I've seen guys put together retard combo's, where the engine barely made 100psi on the starter. Then they scratched their heads about why the engine was an absolute mutt until 4000RPM, wouldnt idle worth a dam, etc.

Last edited by MILD THUNDER; 11-10-2014 at 10:32 AM.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 11-10-2014, 10:32 AM
  #5  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Taunton Ma
Posts: 8,527
Received 698 Likes on 341 Posts
Default

Yeah what he said ^^^^^. Glad you are less lazy than me to write that lol.
Unlimited jd is offline  
Old 11-10-2014, 10:35 AM
  #6  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lil red
Yeah what he said ^^^^^. Glad you are less lazy than me to write that lol.
You hit it, I just took it a step further brother.

I heard you are building some 427's with 7.5:1 and a 262/270 at .050 cam, and propping for a 4600RPM peak, and a 3000RPM cruise? Single plane with 360cc heads and a 1350 dominator. Should be sweet.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 11-10-2014, 10:41 AM
  #7  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: OK CIty, OK
Posts: 1,449
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
You hit it, I just took it a step further brother.

I heard you are building some 427's with 7.5:1 and a 262/270 at .050 cam, and propping for a 4600RPM peak, and a 3000RPM cruise? Single plane with 360cc heads and a 1350 dominator. Should be sweet.
Hey! I thought our emails were private!

Thanks for explaining that.
Cole2534 is offline  
Old 11-10-2014, 12:10 PM
  #8  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: bel air, md
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
You hit it, I just took it a step further brother.

I heard you are building some 427's with 7.5:1 and a 262/270 at .050 cam, and propping for a 4600RPM peak, and a 3000RPM cruise? Single plane with 360cc heads and a 1350 dominator. Should be sweet.
Definately gonna be torquey I'm gonna go out on a limb and say a good starting point for a prop would be 17 pitch 3 blade.
Black Baja is offline  
Old 11-10-2014, 02:52 PM
  #9  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: OK CIty, OK
Posts: 1,449
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You sure BB? I got them F gearsets in my Bravo II.
Cole2534 is offline  
Old 11-10-2014, 03:23 PM
  #10  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Black Baja
Definately gonna be torquey I'm gonna go out on a limb and say a good starting point for a prop would be 17 pitch 3 blade.
How do you feel about running the fuel pump from a 1976 Ford Pinto on that setup?
MILD THUNDER is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.