Duck Diggler

1982 pantera 24 pretty much the same hull as a 1994 python 24. I am interested in both. Ive always liked the panteras, but I like the python because it already has the bravo drive compared to the trs. Im not opposed to a trs setup. Just kinda wanted some opinions. Im specifically looking for a 24 - 7 hull.(martini,excaliber,etc)
Thanks

AllDodge

iTrader: (1)

While the TRS is a nice drive, parts are the issue, so if it was me I would stick with the bravo

BUP

iTrader: (9)

Also there is more professional help to get a bravo app worked on than a TRS currently

phragle

iTrader: (3)

Unless your running a big motor, the trs adds weight

Duck Diggler

Appreciate, the comments. I guess i should have stated im more interested in the hull differences if any.

phragle

iTrader: (3)

They are all based off the same hull though some have a little delta pad and some dont. You biggest differences are going to come from who layed it up, stringers etc....... some were put together better than other, even with the same manufacture some were built better than others

onesickpantera

iTrader: (1)

From what I have heard the Pythons were hit or miss on quality. The Pantera is built like a tank.

Boatally Insane

iTrader: (1)

When I was shopping, I also wanted a late 90's 24x7 with a Bravo. I looked at two different Pythons.. BOTH of them had rotted, hollow stringers...

I ended up buying '84 Corsa (26x7) with a Volvo drive pretty cheap and spent $2500 to have the transom done.....

Duck Diggler

Sounds like even though an older boat ,sounds like the pantera is still a better choice. I can live with the trs for awhile. I have a 502 550hp i can drop in it and will convert to bravo in a couple of years. Im leaning towards the pantera mainly because of the floor height. I prefer to have bolsters than a strictly sit down boat.

phragle

iTrader: (3)

With the right seats as far as running a variant goes, I cant imagine going back to a stand up bolster setup.

Before:




After: