Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Hydraulic Followers best? >

Hydraulic Followers best?

Notices

Hydraulic Followers best?

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-23-2015, 10:30 PM
  #21  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SB
So, .605" , 218 at .050"lobe is milder than say .650" or so 240 at .050" lobe ? How can you tell ?
If you have two cams, both having [email protected]”, one with .370” lobe lift, one with .400” lobe lift, the lobe with the higher lobe lift , will always have a higher .200” duration number. Wouldnt that mean slower opening ramp? Then bring in a 218* @ .050, with the same lobe lift, and you think that wont have a higher acceleration?
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 09-24-2015, 06:15 AM
  #22  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a question for you mild thunder(or anybody else that wants to chime in),even though I should have checked before I swapped and should really ask the builder I got the lifters from.i went from morel lifters to Johnson lifters and kept everything else the same as my original set up.you mentioned wheel size difference between the johnson and morel lifters.i had some "problems" last fall/winter.redid the motor,same everything just swapped lifters.im going out this weekend to check top end,wot speeds etc.does the difference in wheel size effect performance?i guess the real question is would the engine horsepower output etc. be the same from one lifter to the next?do you know?i know I should have asked the builder but didn't think about it until I started reading about them on oso.

Last edited by hickle44; 09-24-2015 at 06:37 AM.
hickle44 is offline  
Old 09-24-2015, 11:44 AM
  #23  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: OK CIty, OK
Posts: 1,449
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hickle44
I have a question for you mild thunder(or anybody else that wants to chime in),even though I should have checked before I swapped and should really ask the builder I got the lifters from.i went from morel lifters to Johnson lifters and kept everything else the same as my original set up.you mentioned wheel size difference between the johnson and morel lifters.i had some "problems" last fall/winter.redid the motor,same everything just swapped lifters.im going out this weekend to check top end,wot speeds etc.does the difference in wheel size effect performance?i guess the real question is would the engine horsepower output etc. be the same from one lifter to the next?do you know?i know I should have asked the builder but didn't think about it until I started reading about them on oso.
I don't see how it couldn't. The way I see it the larger wheel will follow the lobe profile more smoothly than the smaller wheel.

Curious to see what the experienced hands have to say.
Cole2534 is offline  
Old 09-24-2015, 11:59 AM
  #24  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,539
Received 3,110 Likes on 1,401 Posts
Default

Yes, it will alter valve timing....not much...but it will. It should not move the speedo. I'm sure MK's has a spreadsheet on this.
===========================================

On a totally different subject,
A larger wheel will rotate less times for rolling same distance...no ?

Last edited by SB; 09-24-2015 at 12:31 PM.
SB is offline  
Old 09-24-2015, 12:29 PM
  #25  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the motor has been together for this whole season have had no problems at all.put around 15-20 hours on it.doesnt sound quite the same and it seems to run just fine.could just be in my head.
hickle44 is offline  
Old 09-24-2015, 04:40 PM
  #26  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hickle44
the motor has been together for this whole season have had no problems at all.put around 15-20 hours on it.doesnt sound quite the same and it seems to run just fine.could just be in my head.
You may have lost a little acceleration of the valvetrain, by going to the smaller wheel, and a couple degrees of duration in the mid lift area. But, I don't think it would be enough to make a difference. Usually, the area of more concern, is when running a cam designed for a .700 wheel, and sticking an .810 wheel lifter on it, or even a .750. Now, you might see a gain in the acceleration, and could cause valve float earlier, instability, etc. Bottom line, when going with a "custom" camshaft, all these things are , well, things to consider. Otherwise, whats the point of going with a custom camshaft. Theres more to it than a dyno number. In mild setups, this may be an insignificant conversation. On high end builds, guys take this stuff seriously.

Its always a good idea to talk with your builder or cam guy on this stuff. And , nothing wrong with getting a second opinion, from another valvetrain expert. Talk to someone who does this stuff day in and day out, designs lobes, grinds cams in house, has been involved in lots of spintron testing, etc, and understands the importance of a marine endurance setup. Key word, endurance. A half dozen dyno pulls, doesn't equal success. 300 hours in the field, doing poker runs, without taking a valve cover off, is a better testament to the setup.

How many times does a lifter fail, and the lifter gets blamed. How many times does a rocker fail, and the rocker gets blamed. How many times does a valve stick, or come apart, and the valve gets blamed. The ultimate goal, is to not have failure. Period. When engineers at general motors, Ford, chyrsler, toyota, whomever, design a valvetrain, they look at the big picture. It has to do lots of things, make power, be efficient, meet emissions, work with EFI, idle good, and much more, but the most important thing it has to do, is stay together.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 09-24-2015, 04:52 PM
  #27  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,539
Received 3,110 Likes on 1,401 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
.When engineers at general motors, Ford, chyrsler, toyota, whomever, design a valvetrain, they look at the big picture. It has to do lots of things, make power, be efficient, meet emissions, work with EFI, idle good, and much more, but the most important thing it has to do, is stay together.
I used to think that.........when starting out.

Almost everday I run into a "Why the f*k did they do that." Yeh, it's a tough job being an engineer or what have you for a car company, but there are plenty of things, especially now a days, that will shock you.

Great current example: The Germans make you believe they 'over engineer' their cars.........I never bought into it, and now the world doesn't either.
SB is offline  
Old 09-24-2015, 05:03 PM
  #28  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: OK CIty, OK
Posts: 1,449
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SB
On a totally different subject,
A larger wheel will rotate less times for rolling same distance...no ?
Yup. Big wheel means lower wheel speed.
Cole2534 is offline  
Old 09-24-2015, 05:09 PM
  #29  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Taunton Ma
Posts: 8,527
Received 698 Likes on 341 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SB
I used to think that.........when starting out.

Almost everday I run into a "Why the f*k did they do that." Yeh, it's a tough job being an engineer or what have you for a car company, but there are plenty of things, especially now a days, that will shock you.

Great current example: The Germans make you believe they 'over engineer' their cars.........I never bought into it, and now the world doesn't either.
The Chrysler buy in changed one company for the worse 10 fold, I worked for a dealer at that time..... What a **** show
Unlimited jd is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.