Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1
    Ric232
    Guest

    Dennis, cam question

    Dennis,

    I've narrowed my cam choice down to two cams for my 454 Mag MPI (Gen VI):

    1. GMPP #24502611: 211/230 duration@.050"; .511/.540 lift; 112deg LSA.

    2. Comp Cams 01-414-8-112: 218/224 duration@ .050"; .511/.511 lift; 112deg LSA. (This cam was recommended to me on Comp Cams' hotline.)


    On Dyno 2000, these cams produce almost IDENTICAL power curves. The GM cam is about 5 lbs-ft higher from 2000-3500 rpm and peak power is about 6hp higher at 5000rpm. Obviously, these numbers are too close to assume that Dyno 2000 is dead-on accurate. Based on your experience, would you choose one of these cams over the other? Does Comp Cams tend to have faster opening and closing flanks than GM, which might generate more power but not show up in the numbers? Any problem using the stock valvetrain with either cam? Any other advice?

    One more note, Dyno2000 shows that the Comp Cam has no overlap (-3.0 deg) and the GM cam has -3.5 deg, so I'm assuming water reversion should not be a concern.

  2. #2
    Dennis Moore
    Guest

    Ric 232

    I really like the Comp Cams 218/224 but I would order a cam with a 110 LSA. What does the dyno program say when you tighten the LSA?
    I would install it with no advance for a more noticable performance gain.

    I don't know why Chevy designed a camshaft with 19 degrees more exhaust duration than intake. They must have some reason but nobody else has ever done it!
    As far as I am concerned the longer you hold the exhaust valve open the more water you are going to get back into the cylinders at an idle.

    I hope I am right about that. But it makes sense to me!

    Dennis Moore
    FAMILY AND PERFORMANCE BOATING MAGAZINE

  3. #3
    Ric232
    Guest
    Dennis,

    The guy I talked to at Comp Cams stated specifically that I should order w/ a 112 LSA to avoid water reversion. He said this w/o me asking him.

    Anyway, when I change the LSA to a 110, the peak torque goes up 5 lbs-ft @ 3500 rpm and 13hp @ 5000, 21hp @ 5500 (higher than I think I want to run). There is almost no difference between the HP graphs with 112 vs 110 until you reach 5000rpm.

  4. #4
    DonMan
    Guest
    Rick, have you considered a 502/502 (ZZ502) camshaft?
    .527" / .544" 224* / 234* not sure of LSA

    I am going to run this in my 454. Stock valvetrain will work OK, but I am installing Comp Cams springs.
    If interested, I can get you a good deal on a new, pull-out cam.

  5. #5
    Registered formula31's Avatar
    My Boats:
    1988 Cruisers 2800 Rogue
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    2,560
    Thats very similar to the Edelbrock Torker 2 flat tappet cam that I use. 224, 232 at .050, lift .527, .553 at 114 and I install it 5 advanced. Works very good in my 468's with no reversion.

  6. #6
    Registered jdnca1's Avatar
    My Boats:
    28 Daytona
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Alexandria, KY
    Posts
    1,099
    These cams are way too small to worry about reversion. I would go with the comp on 112 CL for your application based on the r's you want to turn.

  7. #7
    Registered
    My Boats:
    1997 Baja 232
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA, US
    Posts
    352
    I've got some experience with the GM 454HO cam that you list. I also did the dyno 2000 thang and was impressed with the power I was 'supposed' to pick up (almost 80hp difference at 4600rpm). I installed this cam and Gil manifolds and only picked up 2 mph. Was kinda dissapointed. It pulls waaaaaaaay harder down low, to the point i can blow out my prop fairly easily, but at 4200 rpm, it poops out. It also has a very boring, smooth idle. My friends stock 454 mag idles 'badder'. Might be my heads tho, i'm running the Vortec heads, maybe the rect port work better with this cam.? Any comments on this Dennis? I've been toying with the idea of some Edelbrock marine aluminums now...... At what speed does the need to go faster go away???

  8. #8
    Registered formula31's Avatar
    My Boats:
    1988 Cruisers 2800 Rogue
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    2,560
    At what speed does the need to go faster go away??? [/B][/QUOTE]

    NEVER

  9. #9
    Dennis Moore
    Guest

    Good cam for the Vortech heads.

    Madmax,
    I bet that is a good cam for the Vortech heads! No, I wouldn't go with the rectangle port heads. They are just too big for anything but a monster motor. The Edelbrock marine heads are great (hard anodized aluminum and inconnel exhaust valves) but you would have to change the cam again to realize a performance increase.

    JDNC1,
    I agree that the cam is way to small to worry about reversion. I think Rick is going to be disappointed with the small/if any performance increase. It is very hard to improve engine performance without increasing engine speed.

    Formula31
    I rebuilt a few 454 engines for a winter project one year and installed the cam you suggested and they worked very well. A really good replacement for the stock camshaft with a good performance increase (also very reasonably priced!).

    Dennis Moore

  10. #10
    Platinum Member Platinum Member KAAMA's Avatar
    My Boats:
    A boat?....What boat??? How about a galvanized warsh tub wit a tornady strapped own da rear!
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Western Michigan
    Posts
    4,147
    Dennis,

    What kind of LSA would recommend for naturally aspirated 540 cubic inch engine with a cam that has something like 234*/240* (about .600" lift) ???

    Thanks,
    Mark/KAAMA


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. rev.rotation cam shaft sbc. dennis help!
    By dirtyplumber in forum General Q & A
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-08-2004, 01:26 AM
  2. v6 cam question fro dennis moore
    By mikev in forum General Q & A
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-05-2004, 12:51 PM
  3. Question for Dennis Moore...
    By fred in forum General Q & A
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-16-2003, 12:41 PM
  4. question for dennis moore?
    By hauling ass-a in forum General Q & A
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-15-2003, 12:17 PM
  5. another question for dennis
    By crmax in forum General Q & A
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-28-2003, 07:22 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
OSO Sponsor
OSO Advertisers


OSO Directory
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Original Poster In Postbit provided by Original Poster In Postbit v1.0.0 (Free) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Copyright 2011 OffShoreOnly. All rights reserved.