Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Muscle car related vacuum advance vs piston speed >

Muscle car related vacuum advance vs piston speed

Notices

Muscle car related vacuum advance vs piston speed

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-09-2017, 05:46 PM
  #1  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
vintage chromoly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: cleveland ohio
Posts: 2,634
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Muscle car related vacuum advance vs piston speed

Hello all.
Question about vacuum advance I've been battling for a bit. Talked to several "experts" on this matter and, like most topics, getting conflicting thoughts.
I fully understand how and why this system works and why it's benedicial in a street driven car.
My question is this:
Under highway style cruise when the vacuum advance is fully deployed, if I were to suddenly go to WOT, will the vacuum canister release the advance quickly enough to not cause detonation. In other words, does the speed of the Pistons rise faster than the advance comes down?

I want to keep the vacuum advance for obvious reasons and my car is a relatively mild non track car.

446CI Chrysler RB
Solid flat tappet cam
10.5" of vacuum at idle, in gear
3.23 rear
2800 stahl
3700 pound car

Thanks
vintage chromoly is offline  
Old 01-09-2017, 05:52 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,268
Received 239 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

Ported or manifold vacuum to the canister?
abones is offline  
Old 01-09-2017, 06:01 PM
  #3  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
vintage chromoly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: cleveland ohio
Posts: 2,634
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by abones
Ported or manifold vacuum to the canister?
Ported

That said, can you elaborate on both?
vintage chromoly is offline  
Old 01-09-2017, 06:06 PM
  #4  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,268
Received 239 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

In my opinion you will be fine. that is how I chose to run all my old school muscle car engines. Again that is just my opinion.
abones is offline  
Old 01-09-2017, 06:37 PM
  #5  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
vintage chromoly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: cleveland ohio
Posts: 2,634
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bck
Just a guess, but assuming it's not binding at all I'd guess it's not a concern. My reasoning it that the throttle blades react instantly to the pedal and the change in vacuum should show up right away. The pistons however need to overcome their own inertia and have the added drag of the vehicle driveline to overcome. There is the added delay of the extra air / fuel mix that the carb is now able to flow to actually fill the cylinders. Make sense?
It's not the vacuum signal to the canister that I'm concerned with, it's the speed of the reaction of the canister diaphragm. That's what pulls the advance out.
vintage chromoly is offline  
Old 01-09-2017, 06:43 PM
  #6  
bck
Charter Member#568
Charter Member
 
bck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Western N.Y.
Posts: 2,171
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I'd still think the canister and linkage would react quicker than the rest of engine for the same reasons. I did reconsider the whole argument for a different reason and delete my post while I thought about it. But you read it too quickly...
__________________
Straight bottoms and flat decks

Last edited by bck; 01-09-2017 at 06:47 PM.
bck is offline  
Old 01-09-2017, 06:51 PM
  #7  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
vintage chromoly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: cleveland ohio
Posts: 2,634
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

My thoughts are that on a relatively light race car with a tall gear, the RPM's would increase much more rapidly than a relatively heavy street car with a lower stahl converter and a higher gear, where the diaphragm would have enough time to pull the added advance out.
vintage chromoly is offline  
Old 01-09-2017, 07:16 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,268
Received 239 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

I think a lot depends on the type of springs that are on the mechanical advance, most cars of that era had heavy (strong) springs that would hold back the mechanical portion until engine RPMs came well up, with that said they used the ported vacuum to help bridge that gap! Now over the years many distributors have been resprung with custom curve lighter springs that guys thought would help racing from light to light. if you still have the original heavy spring in there and they have not been compromised by heat and time, you will be fine with the ported vacuum, if the springs have been replaced with the lighter aftermarket springs then there could be issues with too much advance. I have in the past ran a ported car on manifold to advance the idle timing to help prevent overheating at idle until air flow begins to pass over the radiator. Another thing to consider is the carb actuation, is it a vacuum sec or 1 to 1 mechanical
abones is offline  
Old 01-09-2017, 07:20 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: taxachusetts
Posts: 3,091
Received 696 Likes on 350 Posts
Default

this project is screaming for a daytona ignition box,,then its program it right,done.
sutphen 30 is offline  
Old 01-09-2017, 07:20 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,268
Received 239 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

the engineers back then pretty much had the timing curves figured out for each engine they produced! they didn't want to be replacing pistons under warranty!
abones is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.