Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Who has testing results with outdrive gear ratios? >

Who has testing results with outdrive gear ratios?

Notices

Who has testing results with outdrive gear ratios?

Old 01-29-2002, 10:18 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
MIKEHTMSR24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Simpsonville, SC 29680
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up Who has testing results with outdrive gear ratios?

I am looking for some accurate info. I am wanting to know who has done this test.
Has anyone ran a 1.36 drive with a certain model of prop at a certain rpm. Then swithced to a 1.5 drive and use that same model of prop. The only difference in the props would be the pitch so that both drives are running the same rpm. On top of that. Was the test done back to back within the same afternoon.
I realize that this is a pipe dream test.
Tell me your story.
Did you gain or loose speed going from 1.36 to 1.5?
MIKEHTMSR24 is offline  
Old 01-30-2002, 12:44 AM
  #2  
Charter Member #1093
Charter Member
 
SteveDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lighthouse Point & Ocean Reef FL
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Mike,

If it helps, I went the other way, from a 1.50 to 1.35. Same props, speed increase of app. 2 MPH at top end but significant gain at various cruise speeds. I swtiched gear ratio as I was hitting the limmiter with the 1.50 and 36 inch on the center drive, 35 inch on outers. (Triple engine, app. 725 each, Bravo XR drives, 4 blade labbed Mercury props)

Basically the same amount of fuel and other weight on board for each test, and similar weather in terms of temp, dew point and air density, but not run back to back on same day.

Will be trying 5 blade hydromotives this weekend. 1/4 inch larger diameter, but 3 inch less pitch. Currently turning about 5350 with the Bravos (rev limiter is set at 5600-reprogrammed ECU from Whipple)

Will share data after the test runs.

Take care,

Steve
SteveDavid is offline  
Old 01-30-2002, 07:18 AM
  #3  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
MIKEHTMSR24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Simpsonville, SC 29680
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

Steve, I would guess some of the speed increase was because of you hitting the rev limiter on the center engine with the 1.5.
I have found that all of the Bravos I have tested and owned are really not 15.25" in dia(as advertised). They are around 15.1 to 15.125". I asked Dennis from Mercy. and he agreed.
What was your top speed with the 1.35's. I have been told the 34 and up are not very eff. Do you know your slip?
I am very interested in your new test with the 5 hydros.
MIKEHTMSR24 is offline  
Old 02-01-2002, 08:15 AM
  #4  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: PA and MD
Posts: 1,461
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Post

Mike, This is an ongoing discussion. Which prop is more efficient a 28" or 30"+. The arguement is which is better a 28" with 1.36 or 30" with 1.5.
cobra marty is offline  
Old 02-01-2002, 08:58 AM
  #5  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 8 Posts
Post

Mike - good question. A friend of mine switched from 23 @ 1.36 to 25 @ 1.5 on a 1989 35 Fountain. At the same engine RPM they went faster, spinning the 25 slower. I think this must be due to prop efficiency. I've also heard that Formula used 1.65 gears and more pitch.

SteveDavid - I read on Hydromotive's website that they have a new round ear Quad IV for boats that need more bowlift. (More like a bravo one prop?) Have you tried these?
tomcat is offline  
Old 02-01-2002, 10:27 PM
  #6  
Charter Member #1093
Charter Member
 
SteveDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lighthouse Point & Ocean Reef FL
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Hi Guys,

The round eared (4 blade) Hydromotives work fine once on plane but cavitate significantly getting there (Probably due to the weight of my boat) However, top end was the same with the Hydro's as the Merc 4 blades. The 5 blade Hydro's we're testing this weekend are similar in blade shape to the conventional Hydromotive prop. I'll know how they work after this Sunday.

As to slip with my current Bravo set up, it goes from app. 15% at 80 MPH to almost 25% at 97 MPH.

Good info on this thread and the similar one Tomcat started in this forum. Sharing this kind of data can sure help in selecting the appropriate parts and pieces. Thanks!

Steve
SteveDavid is offline  
Old 02-02-2002, 09:39 AM
  #7  
BigGrizzly
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Bam has done this and found the 1.5:1 is faster than the 1.36:1 when they are propped correctly. Check their web site. Most people here go to 1.36 drives because the run out of prop. Some have gone to the new 1.25 on boats going over a buck. Merc props of 34 pitch blow out on these boats.

Randy

[ 02-02-2002: Message edited by: BigGrizzly ]
 
Old 02-05-2002, 05:51 PM
  #8  
HavasuCat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I went from 1.50's to 1.35's and from a 32" lab merc prop to a 30" merc lab prop. with The 32" prop the boat (DCB Mach 26) was hard to plane because of blowout. I need to drop to a 29" or 28" prop this summer to see what top end numbers I get. During the winter the 30" prop worked ok turning 5800 rpm at 104 mph on gps, but during the hot summer months at Havasu I can only turn the 30 about 5100 rpm.

From friends experiences the smaller props (28"-30") have been more efficient as far as slip goes. I have not done enough testing with props myself to see if it holds true on my boat, but the 30" prop does not blow out like the 32" did.
 
Old 02-05-2002, 07:17 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: PA and MD
Posts: 1,461
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Post

HavasuCat, You're at about the same as me. I run 1.36 and 30" for top end 100mph and usse a 28" the other time for midrange punch. I am thinking of going to a 1.26 and use 26 and 28 and if I get a bigger motor then go with the 30". Knock wood I haven't broken a HP bravo drive with 725HP.
cobra marty is offline  
Old 02-05-2002, 09:19 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Flemington, N.J. U.S.A
Posts: 2,174
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Post

All the prop guys and race guys I have talked to seam to think that turning a bigger prop slower works better . Less slip . It has a better chance of grabbing ahold of the water to push . As others have said the only time you run higher gears is when you can't get a bigger prop. I have 1.32's with 17 1/2x 31's and I need more !It would probably work better if I could use 1.50 and get about a 44" pitch !

Maybe a tug boat prop ?

[ 02-05-2002: Message edited by: boot ]
boot is offline  

Quick Reply: Who has testing results with outdrive gear ratios?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.