Super Cat any drive combination
#11
Originally posted by DPT MOTORSPORTS
I agree to various drive specifications. One problem with that is Mercury Racing gets very upset if they are not the only ones.
I agree to various drive specifications. One problem with that is Mercury Racing gets very upset if they are not the only ones.
Last edited by tachyon; 02-04-2004 at 07:52 AM.
#15
LOOK AT THE LEAD NOW!!!!!
Platinum Member
Here is my question for everyone on this topic. What do you feel is the problem with the current specs for the motors for the Supercat class? In this type of racing you can kill a motor pretty easily if you wanted too. Set combinations have much to do with this and so does the individuals on the throttles. Always remember that the engines all come from parts fabricated by humans and built by humans leaving the possibility for a potential Blow Up. Unfortunately nothing comes out absolutely perfect.
#16
Registered
Thread Starter
The current engine is ok. The caust of both engines are the same, it might be the time to update the engine size to save on rebuilds, not to eliminate the current engine.A engine runing is 6300 is better then 7600rpm .Bigger is better.
#17
Registered
Thread Starter
The current engine is ok. The caust of both engines are the same, it might be the time to update the engine size to save on rebuilds, not to eliminate the current engine.A engine runing is 6300 is better then 7600rpm .Bigger is better.It also opens the market to sell the engines, 600ci is easier to sell.
Last edited by DWES; 02-05-2004 at 01:43 PM.
#18
LOOK AT THE LEAD NOW!!!!!
Platinum Member
So has this been addressed to the different organizations or have they brought it up yet. It seemed to me last year that the Mercury engines were more reliable if you can even say that in this form of motor sport. Although the Sterlings showed to have a little bit more power or maybe it was just the person using that power. Should be interesting to see what happens.