Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Nordic
35 flame vs 35 fountain >

35 flame vs 35 fountain

Notices

35 flame vs 35 fountain

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-24-2011, 03:03 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: LOTO 19 MM
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 35 flame vs 35 fountain

Whats the difference ride, size, speed, quality. Say a ten year old boat from both manufactures.
flying J is offline  
Old 11-25-2011, 07:21 AM
  #2  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Killeen Texas/Fort Hood
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Are you scoping both out seriously or just wondering? I dont know a lot about Fountains, and I am new to Nordic, but I am very happy with my Heat. I am sure the Flame would not disappoint. Were I you, I would get into both of them, see if anyone around you has one or the other and get a hands on feel for it. Thats how I bought my Heat. Just some friendly advice. Happy hunting!
Jay Gadsby is offline  
Old 11-28-2011, 08:38 AM
  #3  
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Dean Ferry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Merritt Is. Fl. USA
Posts: 7,212
Received 393 Likes on 141 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flying J
Whats the difference ride, size, speed, quality. Say a ten year old boat from both manufactures.
Nordic Flame 35' hands down,
__________________
Everything is for sale @ a certain $$
Dean Ferry is offline  
Old 12-03-2011, 09:11 PM
  #4  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would prefer a 10 year old 35 Fountain than a brand new Nordic. "Hands down". If the Nordic was a good hull, why didn't you see any running 10 years ago in the Factory 2 class when Fountain "Hands down" dominated the class.
bar3 is offline  
Old 12-03-2011, 09:18 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: St Amant La
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bar3
I would prefer a 10 year old 35 Fountain than a brand new Nordic. "Hands down". If the Nordic was a good hull, why didn't you see any running 10 years ago in the Factory 2 class when Fountain "Hands down" dominated the class.


MrSneakAttack is offline  
Old 12-03-2011, 09:56 PM
  #6  
Chris
Gold Member
 
CB-BLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I am definately a "Nordic" guy.

The fit and finish of a ten year old Flame is definately better than a ten year old Fountain in my opinion.

Performance wise...the Fountain will kill the Nordic.

A new Flame with 525's is a mid 90 mph boat. (92 ish)
A new 35 Fountain with 525's will do 102-103 all day long.

The hull on a 2001 35 fountain is the same as it is on the 2011 model...the hull changed in 1999.

Them is just facts,

Chris

P.S. The winshield on the flame just flat sucks! ... it throws the wind right in your face...

Last edited by CB-BLR; 12-03-2011 at 10:03 PM.
CB-BLR is offline  
Old 12-04-2011, 09:24 AM
  #7  
Registered
 
Steve Zuckerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nashvegas, TN
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The Fountain is actually a 32' hull and running surface running a 35' deck. That is an old hull designer's trick, making the hull run on a smaller boat's running surface to reduce drag. Their step angles and narrower transom width also make the boat faster. The Flame is a full length 35' hull. It runs in the low 90s with stock 525s.
It takes about 700HP per side to run 100 consistently.
One I am familiar with running 725s runs 104 in summer heat with a full load.
Styling is a subjective thing, but I lean to the modern convex lines of the Flame.
I would look at and ride in both.
Steve

Last edited by Steve Zuckerman; 12-04-2011 at 12:48 PM.
Steve Zuckerman is offline  
Old 12-04-2011, 12:46 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Steve Zuckerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nashvegas, TN
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bar3
I would prefer a 10 year old 35 Fountain than a brand new Nordic. "Hands down". If the Nordic was a good hull, why didn't you see any running 10 years ago in the Factory 2 class when Fountain "Hands down" dominated the class.
Thank you for your informed and expert opinion bar3.
I'd say it's worth your post count, maybe less.
Steve
Steve Zuckerman is offline  
Old 12-04-2011, 01:21 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi Steve, Yes, I usually do refrain from posting on here. Although your buddy Chris poked at me on this subject matter so I had to chime in... I have "a little" experience with the Fountain's.

Best Regards
Ben Robertson III
bar3 is offline  
Old 12-04-2011, 01:23 PM
  #10  
Chris
Gold Member
 
CB-BLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Zuckerman
Thank you for your informed and expert opinion bar3.
I'd say it's worth your post count, maybe less.
Steve
Ha Ha Steve...I love your charming wit!

bar3 is Ben Robertson of Hering propellors.

He used to build boats for Fountain.
His dad built and drove/throttled the Cat Killer.

I think he knows a little about Fountains and boats in general.

Chris

P.S. a 38 Fountain will do between 96-100 mph with stock 525's...with one doing 103 in Greenville NC with Herings new 7 blade props....still faster than the better looking Flame.

Last edited by CB-BLR; 12-04-2011 at 01:35 PM.
CB-BLR is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.