Go Back   Offshoreonly.com > Owner's Forum > Pantera


OSO Sponsor
NorTech
OSO Sponsor

Advertiser

Advertiser


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-21-2009, 02:15 PM   #1
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: tampa, fl
Posts: 78
81' Pantera 24
Twins on a 24x7 hull?

I read allot of posts that say that the 24x7 hulls and twin outboards do not go together well. Is there any reason behind this?
Me, I like the fact I have 2 motors and to be honest I think it looks silly with one little motor sitting behind the boat..... not proportional to me I guess.
Besides aesthetics are there any real advantages/disadvantages???? Is weight the main concern?
beck427 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 11:25 AM   #2
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
ziemer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: St. Cloud, FL
Posts: 725
1995 Allison Grand Sport & 1990 30' Velocity
Quote:
Originally Posted by beck427 View Post
I read allot of posts that say that the 24x7 hulls and twin outboards do not go together well. Is there any reason behind this?
Me, I like the fact I have 2 motors and to be honest I think it looks silly with one little motor sitting behind the boat..... not proportional to me I guess.
Besides aesthetics are there any real advantages/disadvantages???? Is weight the main concern?
Not sure either.

I think it's more on how the weight is displaced rather than the total weight...a pair of 2.5/200 Mercury's only weigh about 850-900 lbs which is comparable to a big block/bravo combo. I think it's not as desirable becuase that 900 lbs is hanging off the transom, set up higher, and spread apart which leads to more side to side action because of the limited 7' beam. Having all that same weight down at the water level centered in the hull would probably tend to offset the side to side in a 7' hull.
__________________
1995 Allison Grand Sport
1998 Mercury Stock 2.5-260 SS

1990 Velocity 30' - 502 MPI's

http://i112.photobucket.com/albums/n...1/Ally-Sig.jpg
ziemer is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-22-2009, 11:35 AM   #3
Registered
 
Dude! Sweet!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,954
Pantera 28
Looks cool to me and the redundancy is nice when your in the ocean and an engine failure could mean an unexpected trip to Hawaii!
Dude! Sweet! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 02:24 PM   #4
Registered
 
duunoit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 864
28 Pantera
Or Japan...
duunoit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 04:04 PM   #5
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vice City & Tavernier, FL
Posts: 5,449
one ballsy Top Gun
How's the boat running ? Did change the props ? Man i REGRET selling it......do me a favor if you can send me pics of it in the water if you have any as i lost my camara chip, or any pics of it....thanks

jr
thedonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 04:12 PM   #6
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: miami fla.
Posts: 1,512
35 Motion
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedonz View Post
How's the boat running ? Did change the props ? Man i REGRET selling it......do me a favor if you can send me pics of it in the water if you have any as i lost my camara chip, or any pics of it....thanks

jr
somehow I figured this was going to happen.
lowblue320 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 11:43 PM   #7
Registered
 
rchevelle71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Boca Raton
Posts: 6,244
1982 Pantera 24sport
Pepe seemed to like them, see the miami to NY run thread. I prefer a high revving single stuck out there. talked to a few that had smaller twin v-6 outboards(150 merc), and they were running much slower than my single 225. If you could swing 2 300 mercs back there, you would be doing great, remamber, a 300 merc weighs the same as a 225!!

Last edited by rchevelle71; 08-22-2009 at 11:46 PM.
rchevelle71 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 08:35 PM   #8
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: tampa, fl
Posts: 78
81' Pantera 24
I am still offshore so I haven't had a chance to try the boat out. I am going to turn the motors out first to see if that does it, if not cleavers or a 4 blade. I am concerned the 4 blades may be too much. As it is now with the 23 mir plus's with 5 people on the boat it can barely get on plane, motors get stuck at 2k and won't cavitate. sometimes it helps to put in neutral and rev the crap out of them, maybe it cleans them out?? I'm going to try new plugs as well (I'm new to outboards).

what do you think a 24 would run with 2 300's on the back??
pair of 2.5 280's may be the way to go...

Last edited by beck427; 08-23-2009 at 09:06 PM.
beck427 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 08:54 PM   #9
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vice City & Tavernier, FL
Posts: 5,449
one ballsy Top Gun
twin 300's would be in the low to mid80's.....my boat ran best with the choppers but it would take a while to get on plain
thedonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 07:38 AM   #10
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upper Chesapeake
Posts: 538
2001 28' Pantera
I have a friend that has twins on his Superboat and it runs perfect.
VelocityRick is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 AM.


Copyright 2011 OffShoreOnly. All rights reserved.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0