| OSO Sponsor |
 |
| OSO Sponsor |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
11-15-2007, 11:38 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Saucier/Gulfport, MS
Posts: 487
1998 Sonic 26 Prowler 525SC
|
29 Scarab....twin small blocks, or single big block?
I'm currently boatless, & have been doing some tire kicking. I've always liked a Scarab, & have been looking at the 29. I see that it is offered with either twin SB's, or single BB. What are the biggest differences in performance between them? How is the fuel economy with the twin set-up? How does the 29 handle between the two set-ups?
I appreciate any input on this.
|
|
|
11-15-2007, 11:44 AM
|
#2
|
|
Gold Member
 Gold Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,353
1998 AO 31
|
performance will be about 6-7 mph difference with twin. Economy with the twins is great. I would recommend twins.
|
|
|
11-15-2007, 12:04 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Saucier/Gulfport, MS
Posts: 487
1998 Sonic 26 Prowler 525SC
|
I didn't realize that the twins would be that much faster, that's awsome. There is definetly a much bigger selection with twins, that must've been a popular set-up.
The fuel economy has me "looking" in the Scarab or Formula direction. I had thought my mind was made up on a 32, but watching the fuel prices go thru the roof, I've been doing some refiguring, because I enjoy boating alot during the summer, & that equates to many gals of fuel x $$$$ = less boating with bigger engines....anyway, thanks.
|
|
|
11-15-2007, 02:02 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered
 Gold Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Laplace,LA
Posts: 180
29' Scarab, Whippled
|
I've got a big single and it does pretty good on gas as long as I stay out of the boost  . they are both nice boats, the twin will definatley be a few mph faster is stock trim. I find the single to be a very well balanced boat and it flies nice an level, handles the lake chop with ease and had it in the gulf a few times with no troubles at all. They are real good rough water boats for their size.
Scott
|
|
|
11-15-2007, 02:40 PM
|
#5
|
|
Racer
 Racer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chesterfield, MI
Posts: 2,203
34 Sea Ray Sedan, 30ft Vicious Cat, 16ft Checkmate, 10ft Ceaser
|
My buddy has a 2000 with a 502mpi/415 Single and I have a 99 with twin 350/300hp. His Top Speed is around 62-63 and I'm 67-68 (both gps speeds)
At 3300rpm I run around 40mph, for him to run 40mph hes running at 3400/3500rpm. On a run down to Puttin Bay (approx 60 each way) I burnt less fuel than he did.. go figure.
Get a nice set of Twins, plus Ins is pretty darn cheap (under $400.00 for me a year)
__________________
When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car
|
|
|
11-16-2007, 04:38 PM
|
#6
|
|
scarab
 Gold Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Easton Maryland
Posts: 278
2000 29' scarab
|
I own a 2000 29 scarab with twins and it go 66 to 68 on gps and I'm trying to make it faster like around 75 to 80 with out doing super chargers I'am finding out it is easer to get power out of a big block then small blocks so if you want to go faster later the big block would be the best choice and you can not get twin big blocks in a 29 because the center line of the drives are less then 34 inches hope this helps
Last edited by trc2; 11-23-2007 at 09:53 AM.
|
|
|
11-16-2007, 04:45 PM
|
#7
|
|
Gold Member
 Gold Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,353
1998 AO 31
|
I had pro-chargers on my small blocks. Loved it. Great cruise speed of 50 mph at 3k rpm. More fuel efficient then several friends boats with single big blocks. I will say one thing, twins in a 29ft Scarab are a bear to work on.
|
|
|
11-16-2007, 04:58 PM
|
#8
|
|
scarab
 Gold Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Easton Maryland
Posts: 278
2000 29' scarab
|
How long did you have the pro chargers on your boat and how did the drives hold up what was your top speed and average top speed
|
|
|
11-16-2007, 06:15 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: tampa florida
Posts: 148
1997 scarab scs 502 mpi--1996 scarab 29.5--1974 22 donzi classic--1988 wellcraft 22v20--1998 scarab 22 sport
|
1996 scarab 29.5- 502-efi -415hp-bravo 1
i had one with 400 hours on motor and it ran 63 on speedo,very smooth out in tampa bay on a 4 foot chop flying at 55 mph.i thought is was very respectable on fuel,with a cruising speed of 50 mph.,i have a 23 scs now with the same motor and im selling it for one reason ,that 29.5 got me spoiled with that nice ride,!!!!! i would have another 29.5 any day.great boat, i miss it
|
|
|
11-23-2007, 04:16 PM
|
#10
|
|
Gold Member
 Gold Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 84
GO 4 BROKE 1998 Scarab 29.5
|
rangerrick63,
A friend of mine and I were discussing the very same issue. Twins vs. single. When I bought my Scarab he said I will hate the gas prices becouse of the twins. Long story short we went out on the boat one day and my starboard engine died, couldn't get her started again...we limped home on the port engine. Just a little food for thought.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|