Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Scarab
43' Thunder >

43' Thunder

Notices

43' Thunder

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-11-2014, 01:49 PM
  #41  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Team Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Huntington Beach
Posts: 1,395
Received 374 Likes on 140 Posts
Default

What RPM did you run with the 32S
Team Archer is offline  
Old 03-11-2014, 01:55 PM
  #42  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Team Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Huntington Beach
Posts: 1,395
Received 374 Likes on 140 Posts
Default

Sorry just went back and ran the numbers again I was using the wrong gear ratio 17.5 x 35 5 blade if you can turn them you should run about 109 to 110
Team Archer is offline  
Old 03-11-2014, 02:11 PM
  #43  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
hullofjustis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,099
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

i was responding to whoever asked about which drive they thought was faster and i was giving a for instance. Imo the 5 drive seems to be faster i was not comparing boats. I am a big fan of scarab's i have had 3.
hullofjustis is offline  
Old 03-11-2014, 02:17 PM
  #44  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
adk61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,399
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hullofjustis
i was responding to whoever asked about which drive they thought was faster and i was giving a for instance. Imo the 5 drive seems to be faster i was not comparing boats. I am a big fan of scarab's i have had 3.
I didn't think you were comparing or bashing, and my consiglieri has a flat deck (Rick G) with a pair of my 750's in it, or soon to be in it lol as for the plaining issue I'm hopin the 1" spacer cav plates will help
adk61 is offline  
Old 03-11-2014, 02:20 PM
  #45  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
adk61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,399
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Team Archer
Sorry just went back and ran the numbers again I was using the wrong gear ratio 17.5 x 35 5 blade if you can turn them you should run about 109 to 110
so 5 blade for sure then yes? not 4 blade?? I was under the impression less blades was faster?? but maybe not in this application...
as for your question of rpm 5500 was where I was at without stepping on the blowers 6% under, 4 lbs of boost... so as u can see lots left in the tune up
adk61 is offline  
Old 03-11-2014, 02:22 PM
  #46  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
adk61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,399
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

my question now Dan is what impact will stagger and 3.5" higher x dim have on the prop??
adk61 is offline  
Old 03-11-2014, 02:32 PM
  #47  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Team Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Huntington Beach
Posts: 1,395
Received 374 Likes on 140 Posts
Default

your slip numbers should go down. the higher X with the stagger will carry the boat a lot higher out of the water. the 5 blade just gives you more trimability to carry that heavy nose with high X dim. and you also need the diameter in the prop. That also helps carry the boat
Team Archer is offline  
Old 03-11-2014, 02:33 PM
  #48  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Team Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Huntington Beach
Posts: 1,395
Received 374 Likes on 140 Posts
Default

Have you ever weight the boat ?
Team Archer is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 08:40 AM
  #49  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rookie question - does staggering create better performance due to weight distribution differences or location of props in the water?
RickyDanner is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 10:44 AM
  #50  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
adk61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,399
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RickyDanner
Rookie question - does staggering create better performance due to weight distribution differences or location of props in the water?
it is my understanding, that there are many advantages to staggering... they are as follows

1) better weight distribution... especially with blown engines as they are very heavy...
2) because the drives are closer together, (typically 21" apart) the engines can be rigged lower in the hull achieving better center of gravity...
3) the drives being this close together give the hull much better lift which = more speed
4) makes for easier maintenance as you can get around the engines when one is in front of the other...
5) because the engines are now lower in the bilge, you would have a better chance of clearing the hatch with blower/carb thus keeping wifey happy (no big hood scoops)

there are disadvantages too

1) its a SH*T load of work to re rig the boat
2) docking isn't as easy as when the drives are 35" apart
3) cost of stagger equipment isn't cheap!! but who we kidding, add the word boat and if you have to ask how much? you likely can't afford it!!!

hope this helped a bit... for more info ask the Guru himself.. Dan Macnamara (Team Archer)
adk61 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.