Military K5 Blazer Diesel?
#1
SeaRay Sundancer
Gold Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Military K5 Blazer Diesel?
Hello all, im looking at trading a bike of mine for an 83' military blazer with the good ol' GM 6.2 diesel. The rig is all original and doesnt appear to be tinkered with. Anybody have one? Anything i should get checked out before the swap?
Thanks
Thanks
#2
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wayland, MI
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have driven a couple while in the military. They seemed tough, but kinda gutless compared to the Duramax. We never had problems with the ones we had and they have very few creature comforts. I think you could find a few websites dedicated to them.
#3
SeaRay Sundancer
Gold Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh yeah......not even the same league to a duramax. All ive read says they are basically a 3/4 ton blazer. from the engine to the th400 trans to the axles. should be fun for what I have planned.
#4
Gold Member
Gold Member
The 6.2 needs a gale banks turbo set up and the gear vendor o/d to make it drivable and give it a top speed over 65mph. With these mods it runs good and sips fuel, but now the radiator can't keep up. I had a dually with this motor before.
#6
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 6.2 and the Dmax do not share one single part except maybe the drain plug. The 6.2 is a gutless boat anchor, but generally very reliable. Hard to kill a motor that makes like 160bhp from 6.2 liters.
The add on turbo setups from banks are non wastegated, and only make boost under heavy load, would not spend that coin on a 6.2 if it were me.
The add on turbo setups from banks are non wastegated, and only make boost under heavy load, would not spend that coin on a 6.2 if it were me.
#7
Registered
The 6.2 and the Dmax do not share one single part except maybe the drain plug. The 6.2 is a gutless boat anchor, but generally very reliable. Hard to kill a motor that makes like 160bhp from 6.2 liters.
The add on turbo setups from banks are non wastegated, and only make boost under heavy load, would not spend that coin on a 6.2 if it were me.
The add on turbo setups from banks are non wastegated, and only make boost under heavy load, would not spend that coin on a 6.2 if it were me.
#9
Pirate of the Chesapeake
Gold Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North Point Creek, Md.
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can't compare them to a newer oil burner but they run like a top. We had a 87 chevy 2500 at work wit lockers front and back and it was the badest truck on the fleet... Its just suited for a low reving low geard set up