Latest tests... HD to HD
#21
Registered
iTrader: (5)
I bet the test did NOT have the new 800 cummins in the dodge. I also noticed how the dodge was left out of half the charts? obviously its because it beat the GM, brakes, I guarantee it, exhaust brake, yes, frame, prob.
Looking forward to the real world test on OSO!
Looking forward to the real world test on OSO!
#22
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: marion,iowa
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just had to replace a rear main seal in a 6.7 cummins when I went to the dealer to buy one I asked if it was a problem and the parts guy said " bad enough that I keep 3 in stock" the 5.9 had a very good history much like the 7.3 powerstroke apparently the 6.7 not so much
#23
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
I bet the test did NOT have the new 800 cummins in the dodge. I also noticed how the dodge was left out of half the charts? obviously its because it beat the GM, brakes, I guarantee it, exhaust brake, yes, frame, prob.
Looking forward to the real world test on OSO!
Looking forward to the real world test on OSO!
#24
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I drove all three, last truck was a Dodge. They are all more than capable of pulling their stated loads. I am more of a flat lander so I honestly don't care much about exhaust brake. If you are buying a diesel to drag race another diesel up a hill with a load like the tests then I guess that is a strange use of these trucks! lol There were two things that made me go with GM. They were the only manufacturer smart enough to put a 9th injector AT the DPF so they don't need to inject diesel on the exhaust stroke for filter regen. This is a problem with washing down the cylinders and diluting the oil. The second in one work.....Allison.