Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Active Thunder
Going the distance.......... >

Going the distance..........

Notices

Going the distance..........

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-13-2013, 07:29 PM
  #31  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
onesickpantera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,388
Received 21 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Somethin' Sexy
Who TF runs a 38' boat with 22" props? Or a 23' boat with a 30" prop? Just give in and admit that this makes no sense....
Here's a great example for the new 502. Baja 26 Outlaw burned 21.3 gph at 4000 rpm doing 49.2mph. A Cobalt 296 burned 22.2 at 4000 rpms doing 37.8mph. Like I said similar loads so similar gph, the difference is in speeds. Now, if they could just figure out how to get more hp and cut the gph in half(and then some) like you did they would be on to something!
onesickpantera is offline  
Old 08-14-2013, 06:49 AM
  #32  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Kemah,TX
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by onesickpantera
Here's a great example for the new 502. Baja 26 Outlaw burned 21.3 gph at 4000 rpm doing 49.2mph. A Cobalt 296 burned 22.2 at 4000 rpms doing 37.8mph. Like I said similar loads so similar gph, the difference is in speeds. Now, if they could just figure out how to get more hp and cut the gph in half(and then some) like you did they would be on to something!
And I'm quite sure you believe these figures would be exactly the same in salt water and fresh water. I'm done going back and forth with you, you believe what you want. I have owned 7 boats, 5 of them with basically the same power. None of them had matching GPH #'s. My 30' scarab burned a lot more fuel than my Active Thunder, my single engine Baja sipped fuel compared to my 36' Cruisers...the scarab,baja and cruisers, all had carbed 454's.
Somethin' Sexy is offline  
Old 08-14-2013, 09:25 AM
  #33  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
onesickpantera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,388
Received 21 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Somethin' Sexy
And I'm quite sure you believe these figures would be exactly the same in salt water and fresh water. I'm done going back and forth with you, you believe what you want. I have owned 7 boats, 5 of them with basically the same power. None of them had matching GPH #'s. My 30' scarab burned a lot more fuel than my Active Thunder, my single engine Baja sipped fuel compared to my 36' Cruisers...the scarab,baja and cruisers, all had carbed 454's.
Your single Baja sipped fuel compared to a cruiser because it cruised at lower rpm, and had one engine.

I will believe what the math says. If you want to believe your boat engines burns less than 9gph at 4000 rpms then do so, but don't expect others to believe it.
onesickpantera is offline  
Old 08-14-2013, 10:08 PM
  #34  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brookfield, Wi.
Posts: 957
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I have a 33' stepped hull with the newer 502's with cats, from memory, the smartcraft shows between 11.7and upwards of 13.9 GPH per motor at 3500 RPM which will vary based on wind and waves. I'm running 50 MPH on GPS, so being the math wizz that I am, it appears to be about 2 MPG or a little under. Not too bad from what I see, some of the supposedly efficient Center consoles don't do much better running outboards and topping out at 60. They probably aren't anymore efficient at 50 than me! For what it's worth.
509 SC is offline  
Old 08-14-2013, 10:19 PM
  #35  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lake Travis
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

must be the magic DDC hull
Crossett is offline  
Old 08-15-2013, 05:13 PM
  #36  
Registered
 
camptappakeg69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Henderson, NY
Posts: 1,067
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by classclown
ok yesterday I had the boat out with a full tank (stopped when I hear gurgling from the vent) ran 24.9 miles and fill the boat back up to till I heard gurgling i took 13.86 gallons of fuel. I ran the boat from 4000 rpm to wot (5000 rpm) a few times for minute each (4) So with a 65 gallon tank I can go 116.77 miles approximately
So did you do the run on one tank of gas or did you have to fuel up? Wish we could have made it out there, maybe next year!
camptappakeg69 is offline  
Old 08-15-2013, 05:49 PM
  #37  
Registered User
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
classclown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: East Aurora, NY
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

One tank the run was approx 94 miles and a lot of fun. I kept the rpms between 3500 and 4000 with a few wot bursts. Everyone was super nice there and Templton Landings food was outstanding. I have been there a few times for weddings or dinner and the food was ok. One of the waiters explained they have started making everything homemade. It would be nice to have another tantrum in the run as well, next years run is going be Aug. 8th & 9th hope to see you there.
classclown is offline  
Old 08-15-2013, 09:09 PM
  #38  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,285
Received 793 Likes on 448 Posts
Default

Interesting math - a few years back I hauled a reproduction antique lap strake boat out of Fort Lauderdale on one of the hottest days I ever experienced down there. I figure we evaporated just shy of 5 gallons of fuel/ hr on the trailer running north.

In all honesty - 4.4 g/hr burn seems more indicative of a mid size O/B at 4000rpm
speicher lane is offline  
Old 08-18-2013, 08:33 AM
  #39  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
REMEDY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 509 SC
I have a 33' stepped hull with the newer 502's with cats, from memory, the smartcraft shows between 11.7and upwards of 13.9 GPH per motor at 3500 RPM which will vary based on wind and waves. I'm running 50 MPH on GPS, so being the math wizz that I am, it appears to be about 2 MPG or a little under. Not too bad from what I see, some of the supposedly efficient Center consoles don't do much better running outboards and topping out at 60. They probably aren't anymore efficient at 50 than me! For what it's worth.
I have same said 33 with modified 525's and the majic DDC hull... I have fuel flow meters hooked to Garmin chart plotter. It gets 1.8-1.9 mpg cruising anywhere from 40-60 reliably. Then slides down to 1.4 mpg wide open in the 90s. 5000 rpm is 80 mph and 1.6 mpg. The fuel flow meters are dead on. Its measured fuel flow not derived from the ecu. I have calibrated them by filling the tank and comparing total fuel from Garmin vs fuel taken to top it off.

Last edited by REMEDY; 08-18-2013 at 08:36 AM.
REMEDY is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.