Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   Apache (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/apache-55/)
-   -   Stillwaters 41 (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/apache/293837-stillwaters-41-a.html)

TURBO JET 03-31-2013 04:13 PM

Stillwaters 41
 
What do you guys know about this boat.
Specs say 11000 pounds is that possible with a pleasure

http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps6250d39d.png

Here are the specs on the motors

http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...psc2ceeaf4.png

Any room for blower motors will they fit

http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps1c729736.jpg
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...psa5b6b23c.jpg

And the drives?

http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps42ef9513.jpg
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps60562655.png

What ever you guys can tell me about it would be great I am interested in it, I like the center steer but unsure about the motors or drives.

Unlimited jd 03-31-2013 05:14 PM

Only thing I know is I want it! To me it's the best setup to have, full pleasure staggered, beautiful cabin and full cockpit looks great to me.

macjazzy 04-01-2013 07:34 PM

Does that build sheet say the valves need to be adjusted every 10 hours?!?!?!? Is that normal for engines like that?

TURBO JET 04-01-2013 08:57 PM

Thanks for picking that out i will ask.

sean stinson 04-01-2013 09:11 PM

That's the best all around performer you could ask for from Apache in a pleasure config.....and yes you should run the valves every 10-20 hrs

Full Force 04-01-2013 09:14 PM

Saw the boat a few years ago in Sandusky when a buddy was considering, was in real good shape, very cool boat!! hope its still as nice.....good luck!

macjazzy 04-03-2013 08:42 PM

depending on the access, having to adjust the valves that often would kill it for me. Even being a mechanic who can do that type thing myself, that would be a PITA to do on most boats I have ever seen.

el indio 04-03-2013 09:12 PM


Originally Posted by macjazzy (Post 3898307)
depending on the access, having to adjust the valves that often would kill it for me. Even being a mechanic who can do that type thing myself, that would be a PITA to do on most boats I have ever seen.


the acess 2 the front motor is tough. third of the front motor is under rear seat.

el indio 04-03-2013 09:16 PM

the motors r mounted low. 4s r obsolete need 6s. i made an offer tues based on putting 6s on her..dont think they will take it..if u blowup a 4 u r out of biz..cya..

RMPRam 04-04-2013 08:32 AM


Originally Posted by el indio (Post 3898353)
the motors r mounted low. 4s r obsolete need 6s. i made an offer tues based on putting 6s on her..dont think they will take it..if u blowup a 4 u r out of biz..cya..

Not necessarily, on the "if u blowup a #4 u r out of biz". I have new upper gear sets and new "big" propshafts for the #4 drives. There are still a lot of used parts still out there for the #4. I, personally would not be afraid of a boat with #4's on it. Also, in my opinion, #6's would, granted, make the drives "bullet proof" but they are considerably heavier than the #4 and add the additional expense of a #6 drive and the ultra high priced #6 gimbal. Just my .02 for what its worth. Sorry for disagreeing with you Mark.

TURBO JET 04-04-2013 09:00 AM

Specs say 11000 pounds is that possible with a pleasure.

sean stinson 04-04-2013 10:38 AM


Originally Posted by TURBO JET (Post 3898575)
Specs say 11000 pounds is that possible with a pleasure.

Seems light but all you have to do is take it to the scale at a truck stop...

Desert Warrior basically the same boat with 6's weighed in at 14590 lbs

el indio 04-04-2013 10:40 AM


Originally Posted by RMPRam (Post 3898562)
Not necessarily, on the "if u blowup a #4 u r out of biz". I have new upper gear sets and new "big" propshafts for the #4 drives. There are still a lot of used parts still out there for the #4. I, personally would not be afraid of a boat with #4's on it. Also, in my opinion, #6's would, granted, make the drives "bullet proof" but they are considerably heavier than the #4 and add the additional expense of a #6 drive and the ultra high priced #6 gimbal. Just my .02 for what its worth. Sorry for disagreeing with you Mark.

as u said used parts..u know anyone who will guarentee the rebuild with used parts? not cheap..might be why mine had 3 stes of drives..ask dr gary...the housing r old and alumn..

el indio 04-04-2013 10:41 AM


Originally Posted by sean stinson (Post 3898638)
Seems light but all you have to do is take it to the scale at a truck stop...

Desert Warrior basically the same boat with 6's weighed in at 14590 lbs

kevlar hull carbon fibre deck..

no issues 04-04-2013 04:49 PM

If you put #6's on that boat you are going to have to move the engines, and redo the transom as well.

rogersspeedshop 04-04-2013 05:30 PM

Arneson Surface Drives
would surely make it bullet proof plus take weight off the transom use less power, it's going to be interesting seeing how the few Apaches run with those drives

Rik 04-04-2013 05:51 PM


Originally Posted by rogersspeedshop (Post 3898913)
Arneson Surface Drives
would surely make it bullet proof plus take weight off the transom use less power, it's going to be interesting seeing how the few Apaches run with those drives

So far the INXS 47' Runs Great as well as the 42' Chief which runs exceptionally well.

sean stinson 04-05-2013 03:13 PM


Originally Posted by Rik (Post 3898928)
So far the INXS 47' Runs Great as well as the 42' Chief which runs exceptionally well.

Just make sure they get rid of the notch in the transom first....That way you can get the Arnesons all the way to the bottom

no issues 04-05-2013 06:44 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Hey Sean... check out this pic... I always wondered how this set up worked out. If that boat did a re-enter ass down.. you would think the transom would rip out right? The notch is in the boat and the surface drives are hangin out past the transom.

Panther 04-05-2013 08:57 PM


Originally Posted by el indio (Post 3898353)
i made an offer tues based on putting 6s on her.

You're getting the itch already?

el indio 04-05-2013 11:05 PM


Originally Posted by Panther (Post 3899833)
You're getting the itch already?

that boat wont do it 4 me..the last 41 that sold was mine..3and half years ago..how have u been?

RMPRam 04-06-2013 06:31 AM

#4 drives
 
Mark,
Yes it was Scott Rutherford and I that stayed in your condo and had a wonderful ride in the Apache.
Gary

14 apache 04-06-2013 11:29 AM


Originally Posted by no issues (Post 3899729)
Hey Sean... check out this pic... I always wondered how this set up worked out. If that boat did a re-enter ass down.. you would think the transom would rip out right? The notch is in the boat and the surface drives are hangin out past the transom.

Looking at the steering rams dont look like it turns much.
Am i missing anything? Thanks Eric

sean stinson 04-06-2013 05:39 PM


Originally Posted by no issues (Post 3899729)
Hey Sean... check out this pic... I always wondered how this set up worked out. If that boat did a re-enter ass down.. you would think the transom would rip out right? The notch is in the boat and the surface drives are hangin out past the transom.

I wouldn't think it would run real well especially in any type of rough stuff because you couldn't keep it hooked up.....Rik and I have had this conversation a few times in the past and NO NOTCH is the way to go!!!

el indio 04-06-2013 07:11 PM


Originally Posted by RMPRam (Post 3899956)
Mark,
Yes it was Scott Rutherford and I that stayed in your condo and had a wonderful ride in the Apache.
Gary

looking at another 41 with 6s..u wont have 2 travel to far 2 go 4 a ride..only 2 fond du lac..we r the mercury hometown dealer..7 time CSI award winner..hope al is well with u..

Rik 04-06-2013 08:54 PM


Originally Posted by sean stinson (Post 3899612)
Just make sure they get rid of the notch in the transom first....That way you can get the Arnesons all the way to the bottom

Technically for a full Stagger but for a standard side by side or even a short stagger could use a filler panel only where the drives are mounted so that they mount correctly.

TURBO JET 04-06-2013 09:30 PM


Originally Posted by Rik (Post 3900346)
Technically for a full Stagger but for a standard side by side or even a short stagger could use a filler panel only where the drives are mounted so that they mount correctly.

When you say filler panel do you mean a panel that is bolted in place of the notch or is the panel glassed in. Do you have any pics of how the panel is filled in. I would just like to see how involved it is and if the integrity of the transom is compromised. Just trying to picture it. Thanks

Rik 04-07-2013 01:05 AM


Originally Posted by TURBO JET (Post 3900371)
When you say filler panel do you mean a panel that is bolted in place of the notch or is the panel glassed in. Do you have any pics of how the panel is filled in. I would just like to see how involved it is and if the integrity of the transom is compromised. Just trying to picture it. Thanks

Basically, the Arnesons are "X" inches wide and will need to be placed on the transom at "Y" location. The area which would extend below the actual transom and extend into the notched are would need to be filled in so that the drive does not hang in the water so to speak. The entire notched transom therefore would not need to be filled, just this area. On a lot of boats this is only 3-4" tall and 14" wide but every boat manufacturer made a different notch and it depends upon which Arneson is being used. Not saying a full transom is not good, just that it is a bit easier for most to address the area rather than the entire notch.

Don't have access to photos at this moment.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.