41 Transom
 

Why do the 41's have two different transoms, is there a difference or no, where the transom meets the deck.
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...psda0c8bc3.png
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...psfdfcab2b.png
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps7420f547.png
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps7f853b32.pnghttp://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps48cd6678.png
This one doesn't even angle in
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...pse2a4cfe7.png
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps9b9e6952.png

http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps373301fb.png
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...psa1052b12.png

Two more different I know Warpath was first when did they change or did they mix it up.

The angle of the transom was causing the u-joints to fail to soon from positive trim. The later ones have a notch at the top of the transom.

Hi, TURBO JET

The original Aronow mold had a 17 degree transom, which proved a bit excessive for the trim rams to handle.
A mold insert reducing it to the industry standard 12 degree was made.
When...? My brain says after hull #11, but I'm not really sure why it says that, so please regard that as an OSO truth only.

Merry Xdim. and a Happy New...etc... :-))

Xactly.....that too.

Thanks Merry Christmas