![]() |
Originally Posted by Teo
(Post 3409559)
Ok. I think mine are limited to 4.650 and with the bravoīs they only reach 4.300.
Do you think it will drink much more gas with the bravos? Anyway. Your are not at the limiter at 4650 but 4850. Your fuel bill should be a tad better with the 24 b1 compared to the 23 M+'s in the mid range. To add a blade, gain mid range efficiency and not loose speed, is not a bad thing in itself by no means. Normally less is more when it comes to speed. So maybe the way around the speed increase would have been M+ 25"'s as someone else suggested. Where in sweden do you boat? |
Originally Posted by A.O. Razor
(Post 3410429)
Hey we that live up here in scandinavia, should not think about fuelprices - too depressing. At least you swedish meatballs have cheap cars:lolhit:
Anyway. Your are not at the limiter at 4650 but 4850. Your fuel bill should be a tad better with the 24 b1 compared to the 23 M+'s in the mid range. To add a blade, gain mid range efficiency and not loose speed, is not a bad thing in itself by no means. Normally less is more when it comes to speed. So maybe the way around the speed increase would have been M+ 25"'s as someone else suggested. Where in sweden do you boat? My plan was exactly that to get some more miles out at cruise. The engines donīt seem to work that hard with the bravos. Iīm running around in the Stockholm arkipelgo. Where are you located? /Teo |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.