![]() |
Originally Posted by Marginmn
(Post 3113668)
Well if Chris Sunkin actually was the mega rich, multifaceted successful business man that he made himself out to be his lawyers would have long since filed slander/defamation charges. Anyone with just an average IQ would have figured that out by now and distanced themselves from the pos. But since he's just a pathetic pathological liar who lied and deceived his way into getting others to build SOS for him he has to sit back and take all of these body punches to his name and reputation because it isn't slander if it's true. He knows it, and most anyone with an ounce of common sense knows it. That's probably why threads that haven't had a post since May 14th are still on the first page of general discussion. A lot of people have figured it out.
Reminds me of some know-it-all art expert who purchases a fake masterpiece and can't quite admit to himself that it's all a lie, so he just bangs his little drum louder and louder. My mind keeps going back to that night in the rental car leaving the Miami Boat Show... Alec, me, CigDaze... and mr wonderful was telling us how he had reverse engineered some complex piece of aircraft manufacturing equipment by himself over a weekend so that his company could manufacture a part for it that was no longer available. So many goddamn lies from this creep. For years. Taken individually, maybe not much to see if you aren't looking. Put 'em all together in a pile, though, and you get a big bowl of some stinkin' chit. |
Wow, get no internet for 2 days and look what you miss.....
|
Originally Posted by catastrophe
(Post 3113760)
To date his explanation is void of logic.
|
Originally Posted by catastrophe
(Post 3113542)
Which thread would you like unlocked ?
All of them ? Why did you guys lock all those other threads ? And then start , yet another ? |
New Math from Ohio
Originally Posted by VtSteve
(Post 3113624)
I seriously doubt the charity would be very impressed, if presented with a doctored bank statement that was made up to support their contribution proceeds. I doubt they'd be very impressed with the character either.
|
LOL.....I thought it was $2,650.00 like NSF check says.....or was it $2,356.98 like the false bank statement says? :D :D
http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/1...eredproof1.jpg |
Originally Posted by birdog
(Post 3113952)
Why did you guys lock all those other threads ? And then start , yet another ?
I dont know . I didnt start any of them. My favorite one was the IN HIS OWN WORDS. While I was thinking about which one was my favorite a thought came to mind regarding the check story. In reality the money he took was really members money. That would include in a substantial way the members that were actually volunteering at SOS. So not only did he enjoy their free effort , he attempted to enjoy their actual money too. We all must remember there are 2 topics here. 1 The attempt to keep 2650 from the charity. 2 2650 isnt the correct amount that should have been forwarded in the first place. |
How anyone can get past this document without wondering WTF is beyond me. Regardless of why this was done, regardless of the circumstances, it does completely baffle me.
Forgetting about any of the other stuff, this document, and all of the other "audit" crappola, this document stands on it's own merit, or dis-merit. Completely uncontested, no denied in any way. Some people just have a much higher threshold of smell. Speaking of Takeovers that didn't work, anyone ever find out who really owns that site? The value's probably dropped a bit.
Originally Posted by PhantomChaos
(Post 3114165)
LOL.....I thought it was $2,650.00 like NSF check says.....or was it $2,356.98 like the false bank statement says? :D :D
http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/1...eredproof1.jpg |
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/a...-apache-3.html
In the thread above go to post #57. There he's saying he's reworking his fourth Apace ! |
Originally Posted by Chris Sunkin
(Post 2575534)
I'm still missing what you're saying. If your speaking specifically to the one on Ebay right now, I've yet to say anything negative about the boat. The seller... that's a different story. You need to read the other thread referenced.
As far as Apaches that we've seen for sale, every one of them has taken substantial sums of money to get into shape- and in most cases more than the buyer anticipated. After re-doing 3 and being on my 4th, I'd say I know a little about the topic. No "dis" as you say, fair warning to the ambitious but uninformed.
Originally Posted by Interceptor
(Post 3114276)
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/a...-apache-3.html
In the thread above go to post #57. There he's saying he's reworking his fourth Apace ! 4th Apache...LMAO!!! |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.