![]() |
Originally Posted by catastrophe
(Post 3716467)
I know where it came from
|
heres a better idea... how aboutnthose that are close friends or delgates to the accused no be able to moderate this section for, it could look like they are banning, crying to IB to delete whe their friends get put own..... So he posted some personal info.. But think of all the postsabout troutly personal an not and Too Old postedabout, Chris sunkin posted about personal.. Only thing this hit some personal friends of the accused that have the majic pen to erase certain people... I call Bullchit......
And a lot of people praised the Pantera 41 it is a nice piece but to tell a person to watch it for another praised pantera about the boat then is defending where a person is getting litteraly fu cked by the company can have a right to tell said comapny their business practices are srewed up... but when the product is done its a fine product..... Go Figure.......... |
So did he get a vacation or is it a permanent ban? May not like his style but if you take the time and read all of his posts including the old thread that was locked you'll see that the vast majority of what he posted was factual and most of the time he was calling out things to come that actually came to fruition. He was obviously doing his homework.
I don't think in the big scheme it was fare to ban him when others were making direct and veiled threats not to mention the insults thrown his way...I do believe all of those violates OSO rules as well. So where's the line? |
Originally Posted by thisistank
(Post 3718861)
So did he get a vacation or is it a permanent ban? May not like his style but if you take the time and read all of his posts including the old thread that was locked you'll see that the vast majority of what he posted was factual and most of the time he was calling out things to come that actually came to fruition. He was obviously doing his homework.
I don't think in the big scheme it was fare to ban him when others were making direct and veiled threats not to mention the insults thrown his way...I do believe all of those violates OSO rules as well. So where's the line? |
A few great posts there guys!
|
Originally Posted by thisistank
(Post 3718861)
I don't think in the big scheme it was fare to ban him when others were making direct and veiled threats not to mention the insults thrown his way...I do believe all of those violates OSO rules as well. So where's the line? |
Originally Posted by PhantomChaos
(Post 3718961)
He made creepy comments about having pictures of another members daughter. :angry-smiley-038: Most on OSO can handle insults, but this type of thing is something I'm sure IB doesn't want on its site.
|
Creepy? You know what's creepy, when personal friendship with bad guy's takes precedence over the good guy's getting screwed. And it's right here....poisoning a great powerboat website. Damn shame.
To those who spoke up against this ......Thank You! |
It's the old adage, "It's not WHAT you know, it's WHO you know"....... Paul's posts seem to be pretty spot on from what I saw. OSO hasn't been the same since IB bought it, probobly will never be. Sure miss Steve and for that matter Jeffery....
Dean |
Originally Posted by thisistank
(Post 3718861)
..... So where's the line?
Apparently depends if you are friend or foe of the accused |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.