![]() |
Those are some big power numbers for a 454 with boat friendly compression and a reversion free camshaft.
|
Looking Good!!
|
Yep!
Originally Posted by snapmorgan
(Post 4894857)
Those are some big power numbers for a 454 with boat friendly compression and a reversion free camshaft.
|
!
Originally Posted by Jim Diesel
(Post 4894858)
Looking Good!!
thank you man! I’m trying! It’s been a constant battle with this boat but I’m gonna make it happen sooner or later! Lol |
Originally Posted by 87CigCafe
(Post 4894860)
thank you man! I’m trying! It’s been a constant battle with this boat but I’m gonna make it happen sooner or later! Lol
|
What’s the correction factor?
|
?
Originally Posted by TomZ
(Post 4894863)
What’s the correction factor?
Whatcha mean man? |
The banner shows “corrected power” above the numbers. There should be a correction factor recorded somewhere on the sheet.
The correction factor takes into consideration deviations from configuration specifics that are baked into the dyno’s calculations. It accounts for temperature, barometric pressure, and so on. Not trying to rain on the parade, but those are pretty big numbers for a 460 that will be tolerant of a heavy pleasure boat. Yours are making about 1.35 lbs ft per cube. 1.20 would probably be a more expected number - I’d look to see if the correction factor was turned up and then ask why. This is well into 500+ CID territory and very impressive. Only asking because others will surely want to duplicate what you’ve done here, myself included. :ernaehrung004: |
Cool!
Originally Posted by TomZ
(Post 4894866)
The banner shows “corrected power” above the numbers. There should be a correction factor recorded somewhere on the sheet.
The correction factor takes into consideration deviations from configuration specifics that are baked into the dyno’s calculations. It accounts for temperature, barometric pressure, and so on. Not trying to rain on the parade, but those are pretty big numbers for a 460 that will be tolerant of a heavy pleasure boat. Yours are making about 1.35 lbs ft per cube. 1.20 would probably be a more expected number - I’d look to see if the correction factor was turned up and then ask why. This is well into 500+ CID territory and very impressive. Only asking because others will surely want to duplicate what you’ve done here, myself included. :ernaehrung004: |
Originally Posted by 87CigCafe
(Post 4894803)
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...989fdc92e.jpeg
Getting a little closer excuse the mess |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.