Notices

Dyno Results: 502 w/ AFRs

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-17-2014 | 10:11 PM
  #71  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,527
Likes: 706
From: Taunton Ma
Default

Originally Posted by tbanzer
What is the top end valve train refresh interval on a cam that size?
My opinion 2-250 hours
Unlimited jd is offline  
Reply
Old 05-17-2014 | 11:04 PM
  #72  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 94
From: yorkville,il
Default

im curious,what kind of performance gain can one expect to see with the swapping of the firing order in a marine application?
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 05-17-2014 | 11:30 PM
  #73  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default

Mike,

From speaking with Bob regarding my cam, I came away with the understating that it's implemented (firing swap) primarily to reduce forces on the crankshaft, and that in many cases, it can add "some" HP. I think some people on the Internet have talked it up regarding hp, to something it's definitely not. I'm not quantifying the actual gains, just sounds like it's not as grandiose as some make it out to be.

Personally I was happy to learn about the reduced loads on the crankshaft. There may be other benefits I've missed, and as such I will leave that up to bob and those that are more familiar add to this.
Borgie is offline  
Reply
Old 05-17-2014 | 11:45 PM
  #74  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 94
From: yorkville,il
Default

i am not against a firing order swap but i dont buy into the claims of big hp gains.in a 10,000 +rpm pro stock engine a little gain in hp can be big but once one team realizes the gain they all do it.the guys that think they will see a noticable gain in performance in the marine world might be dissapointed .this is my opinion but im not one to buy into snake oil,i like results,not hype.
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-2014 | 04:37 AM
  #75  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 2
From: Great Sacandaga Lake, NY
Default

Was told smoother idle also. Dunno..
Rattlesnake Jake is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-2014 | 06:35 AM
  #76  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,154
Likes: 3,714
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default

Originally Posted by mike tkach
i am not against a firing order swap but i dont buy into the claims of big hp gains.in a 10,000 +rpm pro stock engine a little gain in hp can be big but once one team realizes the gain they all do it.the guys that think they will see a noticable gain in performance in the marine world might be dissapointed .this is my opinion but im not one to buy into snake oil,i like results,not hype.
Generally you are right. The good news was since GM did the swap on the 8.1L, it made the cores cheaper and thus not much more money for someone with the standard BBC.

When it was a lot more money, it was not worth it.
SB is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-2014 | 07:53 AM
  #77  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,527
Likes: 706
From: Taunton Ma
Default

It's a free benefit. Swapping the firing order evens out the load on the cam so that lifters are being pushed on opposite sides reducing core deflection. No performance gain at all, just less stress on the cam core and longer life with aggressive profiles and spring pressures
Unlimited jd is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-2014 | 09:14 AM
  #78  
Craney's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,674
Likes: 658
From: Clayton NJ
Default

Do they sound any different with the 18726543 firing order?
Craney is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-2014 | 09:49 AM
  #79  
Rookie's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,023
Likes: 1,522
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Default

Mine does not sound nearly as nasty as my previous cams. But, that also might be the grind. I really miss the crack of my old cams they were just raw. But, I didn't change cams for sound
Rookie is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-2014 | 08:43 PM
  #80  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 1
From: Riverview, Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by 242LS
Those at not the babblings of a mad man.... Bob Madara told me I'd need more carb. He suggested 950-1000 CFM. They were new last summer, so I didn't want to spend more money on a new set.
Bob is correct. 4150 based 950HP Holley carb. http://www.summitracing.com/parts/hl...96-1/overview/ Works extremely well on the 502 motor. Mine started life as the carb listed, but modified. Now flow (flow tested) 1000cfm.
ROTAX454 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.