![]() |
Originally Posted by BUP
(Post 4662907)
I would use a Crower instead of a Scat. And for surely never use a Eagle branded in any marine engine. Just saying
|
Originally Posted by sutphen 30
(Post 4662919)
why?
And then I can ask WHY Scat ? |
Price??? |
Originally Posted by f_inscreenname
(Post 4662738)
Maybe the rods are heavy and all they would have to do is drill the flywheel instead of balancing all the rods
|
There are many Scat stroker kits out there in marine builds. Keep it under 700HP and you should be fine. And always have your machine shop check the balance.
|
Might have been misinformation. Thought we were talking about forged cranks...
|
i have used scat and eagle rotating assembly,s and individual parts,the eagle crank journal size was all over the place requiring mix&match bearings,the scat cranks were spot on sizewise.i would have no problem with 1000 hp with either 4340 crank&h beam rods with arp 2000 bolts but i do my best to talk people out of the eagle cranks for the mentioned reason.
|
Originally Posted by BillK
(Post 4662947)
Anyone that does that should not be balancing engines. Same with drilling on a damper.
|
Originally Posted by f_inscreenname
(Post 4662893)
On a side note, please make sure you put your rod bearings in right when it comes to after market cranks. Make sure you don't need "narrowed" bearings.
|
Originally Posted by f_inscreenname
(Post 4662979)
Maybe I should have explained a little more. A 427 Tall Block is internally balanced but once you stroke it with Kiekhaefer rods there is no way to internally balance it without turning the crank into Swiss cheese. To be honest about it we actually used a 454 external flywheel and drilled it because if we used a 427 neutral flywheel we would have had to add to much metal to it and that "heavy metal" is expensive.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.