![]() |
How smart is Holley Sniper EFI?
Candidly I am not a mechanic nor am I looking for 100% power or WOT out of my boat - what I want is simplicity.
Toying with the idea of using Super Snipers for my Weiand 177/MErcruiser 454 motors and have questions: 1) Is the Sniper smart enough to know if the gas is good quality octane-wise or not and adjust accordingly? 2) Do I have to replace my existing distributors to use the Snipers? 3) I hear they are sensitive to temperature and was planning to use 160-deegree thermos in the closed cooling - will they still work? Thanks ( and sorry for Title typo - cant figure out how to fix it) Swampy |
Holley! oops
|
1. NO
2. you should, and dont buy msd, sniper works best with their dual sync 3. yes And keep in mind there is NO Knock sensor on a sniper so if you tell it to give it too much timing or have some compression and get knock, it will let er knock |
Everything Articfriends said.
I would add you don't have to replace the distributor, you can separate ignition control entirely from the Sniper, but there is no good reason to. I use the sniper and the dual sync distributor on a 454, with 160 degree thermostat. Factory settings don't allow learning until ECT is above 160 but you can change this easily in the Holley software in the coolant temp enrichment table. I have had only 1 oxygen sensor go bad on the water, however you can disable closed loop operation and get back home on open loop no problem once you have a good tune in it. (I carry an extra oxygen sensor anyway). |
Engine masters did a number of tests between sniper and carbs. The snipers weren’t even close when they checked cylinder to cylinder fuel distribution. I was thinking of doing the same. But everything I’ve seen I will stick to my carb. My engine starts great and idles great after only warming it up 30 seconds even in 59 degree water and I don’t have a choke.
|
Some here have made the switch, but if you jump over to the Sniper group on FB, you'll find that there are a good number of issues out there. And if something breaks within the unit (think ECM), the whole thing has to go back to Holley for diagnosis and repair. I contemplated doing the swap, but the risks were too much for me.
|
Yeah - I have wedges so I can put sensors in dry exhaust portion of my closed cooling system and picked up two guages so I can read A/F Ratios to tune em. Going to add electric fuel pumps to help with fuel delivery issues and see how the carbs work out.... then we will see. Thought Snipers would be "safer" with baby blowers and me not being a mechanic but seems like a lot of possible failure points.
|
OSO’er Cms51 has a pair of 6-71 blowers for sale in the Swap Shop. Interestingly, the pictures show a pair of Sniper units sitting on top of those blower. You may want to reach out to him to see if he has any insights.
Single throttle body on a small blower… I think simple is better… carb (think 525sc). |
Originally Posted by TomZ
(Post 4841910)
OSO’er Cms51 has a pair of 6-71 blowers for sale in the Swap Shop. Interestingly, the pictures show a pair of Sniper units sitting on top of those blower. You may want to reach out to him to see if he has any insights.
Single throttle body on a small blower… I think simple is better… carb (think 525sc). |
Originally Posted by ThisIsLivin
(Post 4841706)
Engine masters did a number of tests between sniper and carbs. The snipers weren’t even close when they checked cylinder to cylinder fuel distribution. I was thinking of doing the same. But everything I’ve seen I will stick to my carb. My engine starts great and idles great after only warming it up 30 seconds even in 59 degree water and I don’t have a choke.
What season was this episode on? |
Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
(Post 4842046)
Why would there be a difference? How is fuel from a carb getting distributed thru the intake different than a sniper which supplys fuel on top and the intake mixes it?
What season was this episode on? https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3moa13 |
based on some issues I had with throttle body injection is the intake design. if you look at that dual plane it is solid between planes. as a result the map sensor on most of these bodies is on one side and so only see's vacuum on one half of the intake which gives it a weird signal. on factory throttle body intakes there is a hole between the two so that it evens out the pulses and signal. from what we found was if you cut a notch into the top of the intake between the two planes it helps with the learning and makes it run more smooth. dont know if that was what caused their problems but it could be possible.
|
Originally Posted by compedgemarine
(Post 4842111)
based on some issues I had with throttle body injection is the intake design. if you look at that dual plane it is solid between planes. as a result the map sensor on most of these bodies is on one side and so only see's vacuum on one half of the intake which gives it a weird signal. on factory throttle body intakes there is a hole between the two so that it evens out the pulses and signal. from what we found was if you cut a notch into the top of the intake between the two planes it helps with the learning and makes it run more smooth. dont know if that was what caused their problems but it could be possible.
|
Originally Posted by articfriends
(Post 4842147)
If I bolt a 454 or 502 on my dyno with 10 02 sensors with a weiand dual plane or regular performer, its not uncommon to see #2 cylinder in the 10s and # 3 cylinder in the high 14s at wot, to me its almost impossible to tune certain ones on a marine application as theres no way to lean out 2 and richen up 3 since they are fed by same runner and the runner going to 2 is huge and runner to 3 has sharp turn and is 2/3rds as big. Fuel distribution is almost ALWAYS a issue on a bbc with majority of intakes, most people just dont know it. Ive yet to hear or see what afr a cylinder really needs to be to not melt down at continuous wot, I wont send anything out thats leaner than 13.2/13.4 on any one cylinder thats NA but its not always easy to get there, Smitty
|
I think their Action Plus is the current intake.
**correction, I forgot about the Stealth series. I knew I was missing something. They’re all based off the factory dual plane so I would think the issue would follow across the board. |
Originally Posted by articfriends
(Post 4842147)
If I bolt a 454 or 502 on my dyno with 10 02 sensors with a weiand dual plane or regular performer, its not uncommon to see #2 cylinder in the 10s and # 3 cylinder in the high 14s at wot, to me its almost impossible to tune certain ones on a marine application as theres no way to lean out 2 and richen up 3 since they are fed by same runner and the runner going to 2 is huge and runner to 3 has sharp turn and is 2/3rds as big. Fuel distribution is almost ALWAYS a issue on a bbc with majority of intakes, most people just dont know it. Ive yet to hear or see what afr a cylinder really needs to be to not melt down at continuous wot, I wont send anything out thats leaner than 13.2/13.4 on any one cylinder thats NA but its not always easy to get there, Smitty
|
Originally Posted by compedgemarine
(Post 4842220)
OK, so stupid question. there are plenty of BBC carbs that run different jets left to right to try and compensate for the intake flow. on the Sniper can you change the flow of each of the injectors to do the same or is it just a batch fire type of thing and flow rate is a based on what the four flow.
|
Originally Posted by JaniH
(Post 4842203)
what is the model of the weiand that you see this problem.
Fast forward, guys building a similar engine, asked what he should get, I told him a perf rpm, he couldn't get one, so he bought a weiand dual plane. Same deal, 2 in low 10s, 3 in almost the 15s. tried a couple spacers, made no difference. Compared a stock carbed 502 intake I had to his weiand, they were a mirror image of each other BUT the factory intake had little ridges/troughs turning the sharp corner to 3, I assume to help fuel distribution. We looked at a beat up, nasty perf rpm I had, the turn to 3 was much more radiused and port to 2 much smaller than the other 2 , as if they actually put some thought in the design. We found a new perf rpm online, ordered it, swapped it on, picked up tq/hp over the weiand (like around 15/20 at peaks) and again, distribution was half as bad as the weiand. If anyone calls and wants to dyno a marine engine with regular dual plane in future, Im pretty convinced theres no real good way to fix the fuel issues, Smiitty |
Smitty, do you think I would have any gains going from the low profile single plane Merc 420 intakes to my "Dart" style single plane Professional Products intakes on my Merc 420's upgraded to 500EFI cams in my Panther. My Panther use to run low 70's with my flat tappet 420's and ported Weiand Stealth intakes now with the cam upgrade and different intakes I'm having a hard time breaking the 70mph mark.
Black vs Aluminum https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...429ac4607.jpeg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...d2909ccf1e.jpg |
Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
(Post 4842046)
Why would there be a difference? How is fuel from a carb getting distributed thru the intake different than a sniper which supplys fuel on top and the intake mixes it?
What season was this episode on? |
Originally Posted by ThisIsLivin
(Post 4842305)
It was season 3 episode 39. I think their analysis was that the jets shoot down under pressure and the fuel can't make the turn. Get a subscription to Motor Trend it's worth the money. Over the seasons they have tested everything I've done and I'm feeling pretty good about my choices. They do a lot of testing on BBC so we can learn a lot.
|
Originally Posted by articfriends
(Post 4842246)
weiand stealth and regular performer intake. % or so years ago a friend brought a 502 to dyno, small cam, vic jr intake. motor was a zz502 he had got cheap and fixed up. motor made a embarrassingly low tq number for a 502. We bolted a ported performer on, picked up tremendous torque AND top end hp (only hgad power to 5400/5500). #3 was burn down lean, #2 was pig rich, talking 4+ afr points apart. we monkeyed with carb spacers, still sucked. He bought a perfomer rpm, picked up even more tq and hp, 2 was like 11.5, 3 was like 13.5 give or take, half as bad.
Fast forward, guys building a similar engine, asked what he should get, I told him a perf rpm, he couldn't get one, so he bought a weiand dual plane. Same deal, 2 in low 10s, 3 in almost the 15s. tried a couple spacers, made no difference. Compared a stock carbed 502 intake I had to his weiand, they were a mirror image of each other BUT the factory intake had little ridges/troughs turning the sharp corner to 3, I assume to help fuel distribution. We looked at a beat up, nasty perf rpm I had, the turn to 3 was much more radiused and port to 2 much smaller than the other 2 , as if they actually put some thought in the design. We found a new perf rpm online, ordered it, swapped it on, picked up tq/hp over the weiand (like around 15/20 at peaks) and again, distribution was half as bad as the weiand. If anyone calls and wants to dyno a marine engine with regular dual plane in future, Im pretty convinced theres no real good way to fix the fuel issues, Smiitty https://www.summitracing.com/search/...take-manifolds |
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4842325)
Looks like the BBC RPM rect port's are back in stock. Note, the air gap's don't seem to be yet.
https://www.summitracing.com/search/...take-manifolds |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.