![]() |
Need to understand Weismann WMD vs merc #6
I really want to understand what is the real difference between these two surface drives. Debating on which drive on a single engine 28ft cat. The wmd is about 200lbs lighter and the transmission can go in the ext box and its rated to 1600lbs torque and the merc #6 is rated at 1000lbs even tho we know it can take a lot more and WMD is a true dry sump probaly taking less hp to turn. Why would someone chose the #6 over the WMD? It seems like a no brainer. You don't have to move the motor fwd for trans and its supposedly much stronger for everyday abuse. I can't find exact pricing on either on the net but heard they about the same. The wmd is lighter,stronger and banned from some of the offshore racing because its faster. What am I missing, please chime in!
|
24hrs and no replies? I'm surprised!!! I'm not trying to sell or convince anyone just want some of y'all's professional and experience opinions. Thx y'all
|
I have no experience with them, however, I think they look and the specs sound great. I just do not think there are that many out there. Kind of like the sage 8 drive, looked really promising, but so few out there.
|
I know that every race boat they ever put their drives and transmissions on won and was soon after banned from competition because their stuff was so much better than Mercury's. I have no idea of pricing but would not hesitate to put their stuff on my boat.
|
Yeah, those sage 8's really looked interesting, though i have never actually seen them on a boat to know how big they actually are..
|
Originally Posted by phragle
(Post 4273233)
Yeah, those sage 8's really looked interesting, though i have never actually seen them on a boat to know how big they actually are..
|
Originally Posted by La/stryker
(Post 4273100)
24hrs and no replies? I'm surprised!!! I'm not trying to sell or convince anyone just want some of y'all's professional and experience opinions. Thx y'all
|
What about the Xpower drive? no transmission needed and very light.
|
Originally Posted by pstorti
(Post 4273511)
What about the Xpower drive? no transmission needed and very light.
|
Originally Posted by La/stryker
(Post 4272600)
I really want to understand what is the real difference between these two surface drives. Debating on which drive on a single engine 28ft cat. The wmd is about 200lbs lighter and the transmission can go in the ext box and its rated to 1600lbs torque and the merc #6 is rated at 1000lbs even tho we know it can take a lot more and WMD is a true dry sump probaly taking less hp to turn. Why would someone chose the #6 over the WMD? It seems like a no brainer. You don't have to move the motor fwd for trans and its supposedly much stronger for everyday abuse. I can't find exact pricing on either on the net but heard they about the same. The wmd is lighter,stronger and banned from some of the offshore racing because its faster. What am I missing, please chime in!
Weismann does NOT run down shafts Everything runs in line... No weak points. Mercury bands everything Weismann makes Because it works better. Weismann was the first to drysump and were Banned. Shared there design with Mercury and Mercury changed it to a partial dry sump. |
Originally Posted by phragle
(Post 4273233)
Yeah, those sage 8's really looked interesting, though i have never actually seen them on a boat to know how big they actually are..
Not sure of his thoughts. Jim Dyke used them in there race program Said you had to drain the water from the case Constantly to keep bearings healthy. |
Originally Posted by cougarman
(Post 4273801)
Merc has down shafts internally.
Weismann does NOT run down shafts Everything runs in line... No weak points. Mercury bands everything Weismann makes Because it works better. Weismann was the first to drysump and were Banned. Shared there design with Mercury and Mercury changed it to a partial dry sump. The vertical shaft has some advantages in your comparison also. Not saying it's not good but just saying don't believe the brochure 100% as there is a reality beyond the hype. The parasitic drag is minimal in comparison to the hydrodynamic drag. The Weismann looks more like a kaama |
How can they Ban a Certain design of drive in a Open Class?
|
Look here for "shifter" on the board here that's pat weismann if ik correct he should have answers and info that you need
|
Originally Posted by tommymonza
(Post 4274622)
How can they Ban a Certain design of drive in a Open Class?
|
Originally Posted by cougarman
(Post 4273801)
Merc has down shafts internally.
Weismann does NOT run down shafts Everything runs in line... No weak points. Mercury bands everything Weismann makes Because it works better. Weismann was the first to drysump and were Banned. Shared there design with Mercury and Mercury changed it to a partial dry sump. |
http://www.weismann.net/Products/wsd.html ..... good info
|
Originally Posted by adk61
(Post 4274704)
Merc had to because they couldn't reverse for any long periods without killing the lower gears... PUMP doesn't run backwards..
Had one that only pumped in 1 direction,,was a burr from the blow up that we didn't catch the first go around. |
So if a guy was going to re-rig a mid 700hp Bravo boat would you go WSM or Arneson?
|
Originally Posted by JasonSmith
(Post 4275547)
So if a guy was going to re-rig a mid 700hp Bravo boat would you go WSM or Arneson?
|
Originally Posted by endeavor1
(Post 4275550)
Still flying that 36 bonanza??
|
Originally Posted by JasonSmith
(Post 4275547)
So if a guy was going to re-rig a mid 700hp Bravo boat would you go WSM or Arneson?
|
Originally Posted by Boatlesss
(Post 4275665)
You seriously have to ask that one?
|
Originally Posted by Boatlesss
(Post 4274620)
Gentry was the first to dry sump a merc drive, the #5 back then. Then the victory team just ran the #6 with little to no oil. Regardless dry sump concept has been around for a century
The vertical shaft has some advantages in your comparison also. Not saying it's not good but just saying don't believe the brochure 100% as there is a reality beyond the hype. The parasitic drag is minimal in comparison to the hydrodynamic drag. The Weismann looks more like a kaama And Pat Weismann's Father, so I was told designed the Kaama Drive. . Hmmm . wonder how Merc. liked that drive |
Originally Posted by JasonSmith
(Post 4276156)
I didn't type it in for typing practice. This isn't Mavis Beacon typing school. I asked a question & you gave a smartass, know it all response that wasn't helpful in any way other than to bust balls & make yourself feel smarter.
|
Truth be told Pat dry sumped the IV drive for Victory long before the VI. Drive looked crazy had hoses externally on the drive to pump the oil. And the reason Merc didn't do a full drysump is you have to modify the gimbal and run an internal oil tank.
|
The new Arneson will not need the external trans, might want to wait for it.
|
Originally Posted by Inrecovery
(Post 4287449)
The new Arneson will not need the external trans, might want to wait for it.
|
As we speak my boat is being converted from Dry sump sixes to Weismann WMD's. The upper gears in the sixes do not last behind the turbines. Usually failing somewhere between 10 and 40 hours. I will let you guys know how it goes.
|
Originally Posted by 302Sport
(Post 4287487)
As we speak my boat is being converted from Dry sump sixes to Weismann WMD's. The upper gears in the sixes do not last behind the turbines. Usually failing somewhere between 10 and 40 hours. I will let you guys know how it goes.
I'm planning a large project in the future. I'm going to sell the htm ss24 in the future. It runs good now 102gps with 650 hp. But looking hard at the nordic 28ss and putting my new motor in it. 1350hp on 93 and about 1700hp on e85. I think the WMD is the only choice. I just hope it will work well on a single engine 28cat boat like the 26 eliminator Daytona I have seen on the net. |
If the wife allows it
|
Check out the nordic 28 with the X Power drive on it. It has a teague 1000 in it and it goes over 130mph. Thane said it was the fastest 28 with that horsepower rating. We will warranty the X Power drive to 1600 hp and we also guarantee it goes faster then any other drive. Far lighter then all the drives mentioned above and a direct replacement for a bravo drive. Installed it only weighs 202 lbs wet. Its an actual dry sump drive. Their is basically zero oil in the drive except for what is sprayed in via the 3 stage dry sump pump that is integrated right on the drive. It also has a self contained dry sump tank under the carbon covers.
|
Originally Posted by bauberlen
(Post 4294741)
Check out the nordic 28 with the X Power drive on it. It has a teague 1000 in it and it goes over 130mph. Thane said it was the fastest 28 with that horsepower rating. We will warranty the X Power drive to 1600 hp and we also guarantee it goes faster then any other drive. Far lighter then all the drives mentioned above and a direct replacement for a bravo drive. Installed it only weighs 202 lbs wet. Its an actual dry sump drive. Their is basically zero oil in the drive except for what is sprayed in via the 3 stage dry sump pump that is integrated right on the drive. It also has a self contained dry sump tank under the carbon covers.
|
How often do y'all recommend rebuilding or opening up the drive to check it out with 1600hp? Going to pm you too FYI
|
Been running my Weismann WMD's all summer behind the turbines and I don't have one complaint.
|
Originally Posted by 302Sport
(Post 4344164)
Been running my Weismann WMD's all summer behind the turbines and I don't have one complaint.
|
Put my Weismanns up for sale, ran great all year, just think that shaft drives would be the ultimate setup behind the turbines.
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/s...5k-pair-2.html |
Lots of good info on here. Id like to see a cost comparison between weismann, arneson, and x power. And a performance comparison .
|
I want your weismans
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.