![]() |
Originally Posted by ThirdBird
(Post 2724861)
Not to but in here but, I think you're entirely correct. However, if there is no discernable "seat of the pants" increase in performance, doesn't really matter, does it?
Oh yea, I agree, if there wouldn't be much to gain, why mess with it? Although, if the engine compartment was holding in a lot of heat from the engines, on paper there appears to be some power that may be felt in the pants. Using the air density ratio equation [D.R. = (T1+460)/(T2+460)], say you could reduce the air temp going into the engines from 110°F to 90°F on the same day with better ventilation. D.R. = (110+460)/(90+460) = 570/550 = 1.036, or a 3.6% gain in power due to the cooler, more dense air. In my case with twin 320HP engines, that should be around 23HP. Not a whole lot, but maybe worth it(?) I know going from the hot, humid summer to cool, dry fall days, my rig is consistently 2 mph faster. But that is more than a 20°F change!:drink: |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.