![]() |
Originally Posted by Jg1000
(Post 3770888)
Yeah I totally agree. I want to spin mine up to that range to see if it makes more power.
What dart heads do you have ? Are those numbers at the flywheel ? Yes that is on the dyno. |
Originally Posted by Car Biz
(Post 3770990)
Dart 308's out of the box no portwork
Yes that is on the dyno. |
Originally Posted by Jg1000
(Post 3771445)
hmmm wonder what the flow test comparison is between those and magnum rectangle ports is? I can say that these cams adleast sound fkn kick ass at idle ; ) I think that I will port the heads, manifold, and a set of 496 manifolds and call it done. That is more work that I was thinking of doing but valve guides could use replacing and rest is just port work. I would think that would kick me into 70mph level but if not maybe just be happy and put the money into gas; )
2.25 intake valves compared to the 2.19 stock rectagle ports will make good power ported though!!! |
Rec Heads
Originally Posted by Car Biz
(Post 3771568)
keep in mind the Darts have the raised exhaust ports and are
2.25 intake valves compared to the 2.19 stock rectagle ports will make good power ported though!!! Its a gen IV with rectaglar heads. intake shot as with eshaust. I have a pair of stock non mag motors which I would like to beef up upper end. The long block has 50 hours on it, but I beleive remains non forged internals. My mechanic thinks the cam is beefer but cant confirm. Its a 292 1988. I plan to purchase aftermarket Exhaust. My intakes are new and carbs just rebuilt. My heads are mismatched. One is small oval peanut, the other is lage oval. the boat still runs in its specs range. Will porting Rec heads make nay differnce? Will it need a new carb/intake to get the max out of the hp? Will the internals really brak down. I run it hard 20-30% of the day. |
That bottom end is good under 5krpms but cast pistons can't take detonation. IMO the juice ain't worth the squeeze. adding the top end will put your rpm range higher and you will probably only gain couple mph. I think the exhaust is a good investment because they add power and save weight, plus cast are gonna rust out eventually and possibly damage your motor. Just my 2 cents. You would also need the intake and carb setup to match for that rpm range.
It seems to me that the dart heads aren't that much better than the stock rectangle ports. Looking at my cam specs vs. merc 420 specs it just seems to be a tad to big if I upgraded my motor to 420 specs , which I believe is gil exhaust and 1.7 roller rockers.... the gears are turning hard now; ) |
Originally Posted by Jg1000
(Post 3771634)
I think the exhaust is a good investment because they add power and save weight, plus cast are gonna rust out eventually and possibly damage your motor. Just my 2 cents. You would also need the intake and carb setup to match for that rpm range.
|
Originally Posted by Jg1000
(Post 3771634)
It seems to me that the dart heads aren't that much better than the stock rectangle ports. Looking at my cam specs vs. merc 420 specs it just seems to be a tad to big if I upgraded my motor to 420 specs , which I believe is gil exhaust and 1.7 roller rockers.... the gears are turning hard now; )
my motors make more power than a 420 and with WAY less cam and dual plane intakes! the power is in the heads |
Originally Posted by Dtile
(Post 3771932)
Thanks JG...what exhuat people recommenad keeping in mind the space is tight...and why 496 Mercs? They special/made well compared to GIl/Stainless Marine/ImCO, etc?
|
Originally Posted by Car Biz
(Post 3771973)
i disagree on the heads they lend themselves for more power to be made.
my motors make more power than a 420 and with WAY less cam and dual plane intakes! the power is in the heads |
Originally Posted by Jg1000
(Post 3772353)
I personally don't want to spend the extra money over just porting mine.
i agree |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.