![]() |
bravo or Hydro
2000 27 502 mpi LH been using 23 hydro tried a 24 Bravo 1 plane time is cut in half, mid range is quicker but boat feels like it is kinda "loose" because rpms get to 5000 but speed is still climbing. Should I stay with the Hydro? I like the way bravo planes out. If you have prop knowledge then HOLLA at ya boy!!
|
I have a 05 fever 29 and the hydro 5 blade 26 pitch P5x bowlift did the exact opposite and kept lifting the stern and mashing the bow. I ended up with a labbed bravo 28 pitch 4 blade left rotation labbed it works well the boat does 87mph at 5700rpm but my hull is stepped unlike yours
|
My hull has step. Think all Fountains have steps since 1994.
|
I have a 28 Hydro and a labbed 28 Bravo for my 27. Just like you mentioned, the Bravo is the best all around of the two for my boat. It all depends on what you prefer.
|
Was the Bravo prop also LH?
|
Originally Posted by Griswald
(Post 2876763)
I have a 28 Hydro and a labbed 28 Bravo for my 27. Just like you mentioned, the Bravo is the best all around of the two for my boat. It all depends on what you prefer.
Stock set up on a 27 w/ 502mpi 415 hp is 24 hydro. Bravo is best all around, Hydro will be 2 mph faster top end, but you give up allot for that 2mph.:evilb: |
I had an 01' HO with a 26p bravo RH. Very nice all around given the limited power.
|
I like the Bravo.. No real rooster tail like the hydro .. and maybe 1 mph dif.. but the bravo out perfomes w less cavitation..
.02 |
Originally Posted by BAJA WILL
(Post 2877607)
You must have more than stock power,
|
I ran a Hydro for years on my 27, but after testing Bravos on my current boat, the Bravo is definitely a better all around prop.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.