![]() |
Re: 604ci or 572 ci
Originally Posted by Jassman
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/s...hlight=TMP+750
Hopefully this will help. Its one combination that has worked great for me. |
Re: 604ci or 572 ci
NyKamp..
do you know what crank Zul put in those motors?? Bore and stroke and what rod length?? I am thinking of going big, but not sure if it will work NA. Mine comes out to 650" with 4 7/8" crank, or 665" with 5" crank. Just not sure what the down side of all that air flow would be.. Thanks Dick |
Re: 604ci or 572 ci
Dick I don't know but I am sure you can call Richie or PM JC perf. and he can tell you. Take care, Steve.
|
Re: 604ci or 572 ci
598 is probably the best combo for a NA motor.When you go bigger with a chevy style cylinder head they make torque but the power doesnt pick up like you would think.When you put that big arm in an engine the piston speed increases and the engine runs out of air.If it was my choice i would go with a 598.It should make peak power around 5700-5800 if the cam and heads are not monsterous.
|
Re: 604ci or 572 ci
Originally Posted by xclusive
Is a 604 ci at 5300 rpm better than a 572 ci at 6000 rpm?
572 @ 6000= 4500 ft/min of piston speed This means their is more stress on the bottom end with the 572 at 6000. Piston speed is the speed the piston travels while you are at a certain rpm and yes the more the stroke the faster the piston travels in the same rpm which is harder on parts----rods, cranks, bearings. 604 @ 6000= 4750 ft/min 572 @ 6334= 4750 ft/min this is the same amount of piston speed for both motors. As far as breathing the more stroke will always have more average torque through the rpm band. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.