Staggered vs sbs
I am wondering how much staggering the engines gives you in top speed versus sbs installation.
I am looking at a 38 with Ilmors and Arnesons. any ideas? heiko |
Re: Staggered vs sbs
Mark McManus once told me that staggered engines made the boat faster in rough water. The outdrives running deeper meant the props stayed in the water longer and went back in sooner. Always made good sense to me, so I never questioned it.
|
Re: Staggered vs sbs
handleing at airborn more stablity
j mike |
Re: Staggered vs sbs
Lowers and moves forward the center of gravity and puts the drives deeper in the water and is faster.
|
Re: Staggered vs sbs
I always thought raising the drives makes them faster. :confused:
|
Re: Staggered vs sbs
The drives are lower, going down the V, relative to the center of gravity. This allows a higher X dimension, relative to the bottom of the boat. So you can run 1-2" higher X diimension, still have good trim control, go faster, and have a bigger sun deck for your "crew". What's not to like?
Originally Posted by cuda
I always thought raising the drives makes them faster. :confused:
|
Re: Staggered vs sbs
and they look cool staggered :evilb: what else matters :cool:
|
Re: Staggered vs sbs
Originally Posted by Gary Anderson
The drives are lower, going down the V, relative to the center of gravity. This allows a higher X dimension, relative to the bottom of the boat. So you can run 1-2" higher X diimension, still have good trim control, go faster, and have a bigger sun deck for your "crew". What's not to like?
|
Re: Staggered vs sbs
Performance aside, I like it from a maintenance standpoint.
Of course, if I had that much whip, someone else would be wrenching. |
Re: Staggered vs sbs
1 Attachment(s)
better balance, more speed. room to work, looks cool.
|
Re: Staggered vs sbs
Originally Posted by cuda
I'm not doubting you, but I still don't understand. If you can run the same X without lowering the engine, why would it be faster?
All this adds up to is that the vertical center of gravity is lower than a side by side but the lateral center of gravity is further forward than a side by side. Better turning, more level ride in the rough. This is better for rough water conditions but may not be any faster in smooth water if the boat does not like a farther forward CG. Sometimes the difference in top speed is only 1-2 mph but the rough is way faster as the boat feels more stable. Confidence equals speed in a lot of cases. Docking is more difficult with a stagger but working on the engines is far easier. |
Re: Staggered vs sbs
Originally Posted by Rik
Docking is more difficult with a stagger but working on the engines is far easier. Works good. |
Re: Staggered vs sbs
no trouble docking at all.
|
Re: Staggered vs sbs
Unless The Props Turn In . Then It's A Whole Different World !!!
|
Re: Staggered vs sbs
Cool Info I was just tallking about this topic with a buddy last week.
Bottom line is.... Is it worth it? Do you pay much more $$ for staggered vs sbs? |
Re: Staggered vs sbs
My 33' Race Powerplay is a full stagger, with props turning in and it's a piece of cake to dock. It surprised me the first time I tried to dock it. I'm not the best driver either. :D
|
Re: Staggered vs sbs
exactly
|
Re: Staggered vs sbs
if you have a cabin in the boat it may go slower!
the bottom line is have the manufacture back up what they say it will do...if they tell you 95, then hold them to it....no BS! NO ideal conditions w/6K props it would.... |
Re: Staggered vs sbs
Originally Posted by Downtown42
and they look cool staggered :evilb: what else matters :cool:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.