Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
Originally Posted by JCPERF
And according to Smokey, all the rod does is connect the piston to the crank. :D
|
Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
didn't smokey say there is no substitue for cubic inches?
my new mills are 598ci 4.625 str and 4.530 bore, i figure after a handful of rebuilds they will be square 4.625 X 4.625. im gonna rev then 6200 rpms. we'll see how well the 4 5/8 stroke holds up. :D |
Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
Originally Posted by ratman
don't be hatin...smakey was way ahead of his time you biotches :D
|
Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
Originally Posted by mrhorsepower1
Only because he cheated like crazy!
|
Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
Ok Tall deck 10.2, 4.56 Bore x 4-3/8 crank. What rod Length would you recommend. Naturally aspirated Flat top pistons.
Thanks Mark |
Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
Originally Posted by JCPERF
These 557s that make 1100HP went 178 hours since i built them with the big lifters and Isky springs.And they got murdered too. :cool:
|
Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
Originally Posted by mrhorsepower1
Only because he cheated like crazy!
RHC |
Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
Originally Posted by RHC
It ain't cheatin if ya don't get caught!!!! :D :D
RHC |
Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
Originally Posted by GPM
If it's the light weight block you might not want to use it.
|
Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
Mark, id go 6.635. Happy b- day. Brian
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.