Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Boating Discussion (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-boating-discussion-51/)
-   -   New Engines: 557 or 572 (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-boating-discussion/142981-new-engines-557-572-a.html)

ratman 10-17-2006 06:46 PM

Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
 

Originally Posted by Strip Poker 388
Your saying a the bore and stroke the same??? :eek:

572 4.5 X 4.5

ratman 10-17-2006 06:48 PM

Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
 

Originally Posted by Tapa11
Are the solid rollers really worth the trouble?

what trouble, once they are broken in and adjusted once nothing should change if it does, you will know you have a problem before the big bang happens

ratman 10-17-2006 06:51 PM

Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
 

Originally Posted by WARPARTY36
Just go 1075's and forgeettaboutit! :drink:

yeah forget about it...top end every 50/60 hours, total rebuild every 100/110 hours...forget everything but your check book! also you will want to get another boat so you'll have something to run when your motors are being freshened up mid season :eek:

Panther 10-17-2006 06:55 PM

Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
 

Originally Posted by ratman
572 4.5 X 4.5

Can someone confirm or deny but I understand the 572' has a less than optimum rod-to-stroke ratio.

mikes280 10-17-2006 07:15 PM

Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
 
that would depend on rod length, i do not like a square engine

36spectre 10-17-2006 07:20 PM

Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
 
yes Rob !

36spectre 10-17-2006 07:22 PM

Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
 
bingo...... Panther!!!!

Panther 10-17-2006 07:24 PM

Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
 

Originally Posted by mikes280
that would depend on rod length, i do not like a square engine

I believe a 6.535 is std. on a 572 with off the shelf parts and gives it a bad rod/stroke ratio, no?

mikes280 10-17-2006 07:26 PM

Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
 

Originally Posted by Panther
I believe a 6.535 is std. on a 572 with off the shelf parts and gives it a bad rod/stroke ratio, no?

yes that is 400 long but you can go longer

Comanche3Six 10-17-2006 07:28 PM

Re: New Engines: 557 or 572
 
Great thread! Keep going, I'm learning.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.