Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Boating Discussion (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-boating-discussion-51/)
-   -   Who Needs a Big Block with a 600 HP 427 Corvette Engine Available? (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-boating-discussion/157798-who-needs-big-block-600-hp-427-corvette-engine-available.html)

Michael1 05-09-2007 01:22 AM

Who Needs a Big Block with a 600 HP 427 Corvette Engine Available?
 
I wonder how this 427 small block Corvette Z06 crate engine would hold up in a boat with its super light weight titanium rods and valve train pieces. It also has sodium cooled exhaust valves. It's all aluminum, so it would be one light engine, that's for sure! It starts out at 505 SAE certified horsepower, and goes up from there..all the way to 600 HP with a cam change (the same SAE horsepower that the car manufacturers use, not the inflated correction used by the aftermarket). This thing's got some torque, too. It has up to 526 ft-lbs. Compare that to 503 ft-lbs for the 496 Mag HO. OK, so they didn't exactly use a marine cam, but it does give you an idea of the potential of this engine.

Hot Rod Magazine 600 HP 427 CI LS7 Crate Engine Dyno Test

This seems like an engine even a big block person could enjoy.

Michael

powerabout 05-09-2007 02:55 AM

My guess would be that the cost of the engine to Merc would be more then a big block by quite a lot so therefore they cant market it whilst they are in the business of selling stock and high performance big blocks.
A cast iron big block is only just a little more expensive than a old cast iron small block..where would that leave an engine that needs to have closed cooling, dry sump etc etc, price wise

PatriYacht 05-09-2007 07:12 AM

In a 30' or smaller boat, a pair of those would be fun. You would need a set of dry headers and the cooling system would have to be carefully engineered. In a larger boat the weight savings would not be as important so big blocks would be a less expensive choice.

TxHawk 05-09-2007 07:39 AM

Put a box trailer behind a corvette, put it in 1st gear, get pointed up a long hill and nail it. Let me know how long it lives...

handfulz28 05-09-2007 09:09 AM

Raylar is coming out with a motor based on this platform; it obviously has a lot of potential.

Stormrider 05-09-2007 09:19 AM

See here for Raylars SBC.
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/s...d.php?t=151291

and here...
http://www.raylarengine.com/550_engine.html

TxHawk 05-09-2007 09:40 AM

The Raylar SBC looks impressive. Have there been any installations with results? Should make for some interesting 30' twins.:cool:

cuda 05-09-2007 09:44 AM

Won't it need custom made exhaust, due to the different arrangement of the ports?

MikeyFIN 05-09-2007 09:55 AM


Originally Posted by ExcaliburHawk40 (Post 2121617)
Put a box trailer behind a corvette, put it in 1st gear, get pointed up a long hill and nail it. Let me know how long it lives...

Well, Racing full tilt the engine has won at 24hr endurance races...LeMans for example...

TxHawk 05-09-2007 10:24 AM


Originally Posted by MikeyFIN (Post 2121782)
Well, Racing full tilt the engine has won at 24hr endurance races...LeMans for example...

The LS7 R and Raylars engine are going to be slightly different than what show up in the crate. Look at the other GM crate engines, they are not intended for marine use. I am not saying that it could not be built for marine use, Like the Raylar 550 will be. What I was saying was that I wouldnt recommend taking the 427 crate engine and setting it in your boat.

Edward R. Cozzi 05-09-2007 08:08 PM


Originally Posted by ExcaliburHawk40 (Post 2121617)
Put a box trailer behind a corvette, put it in 1st gear, get pointed up a long hill and nail it. Let me know how long it lives...

This post shows you really understand. I applaud you.
Ed

Michael1 05-09-2007 08:24 PM


Originally Posted by ExcaliburHawk40 (Post 2121617)
Put a box trailer behind a corvette, put it in 1st gear, get pointed up a long hill and nail it. Let me know how long it lives...

You may be waiting a little longer than some people think. I believe this engine had to pass GM's 300 hour durability test, which is at full throttle cycling between peak torque and peak horsepower. I'm not necessarily condoning putting it into a boat stock, but it might do quite well as is.

Michael

handfulz28 05-09-2007 09:39 PM


Originally Posted by ExcaliburHawk40 (Post 2121617)
Put a box trailer behind a corvette, put it in 1st gear, get pointed up a long hill and nail it. Let me know how long it lives...

I bet it would bounce off the rev limiter until it ran out of gas :D Fill it up and it would keep going, and going, and going :evilb:

I think Merc and the marine industry have brainwashed the marine community to be fearful of anything that hasn't been painted by a marine power company. The truth is GM offers a 6.0L and 8.1L that have very little done to them before they have marine accessories bolted on and then go to paint.
Would an LS7 crate motor be "optimized" for marine use? Probably not but all it would need is a cam change. I think it'd be interesting to put a "marinized" LS7 against a 496HO.

Here's another crazy thought applicable to GM crate motors. A buddy's father in law is working on an FAA-certified retro-fit to put "crate" LS2s in Cessnas to replace OEM Lycomings and Continentals. Nothing special done to the power plant, bolt on airplane parts, geared to run around 4000rpm at 75% cruise. These "crate" motors are running over 2000hrs TBO (time between overhaul).
YMMV

MikeyFIN 05-10-2007 04:19 AM


Originally Posted by ExcaliburHawk40 (Post 2121825)
The LS7 R and Raylars engine are going to be slightly different than what show up in the crate. Look at the other GM crate engines, they are not intended for marine use. I am not saying that it could not be built for marine use, Like the Raylar 550 will be. What I was saying was that I wouldnt recommend taking the 427 crate engine and setting it in your boat.

Whats the diff between a fresh water cooled longblock in marine or auto use?
None most of the time.
As it is an aluminum engine it Has to be fresh water cooled.
So no problem using a crate engine IMO, just a tad more work if you do it yourself.

MikeyFIN 05-10-2007 04:28 AM


Originally Posted by handfulz28 (Post 2122676)
I bet it would bounce off the rev limiter until it ran out of gas :D Fill it up and it would keep going, and going, and going :evilb:

I think Merc and the marine industry have brainwashed the marine community to be fearful of anything that hasn't been painted by a marine power company. The truth is GM offers a 6.0L and 8.1L that have very little done to them before they have marine accessories bolted on and then go to paint.
Would an LS7 crate motor be "optimized" for marine use? Probably not but all it would need is a cam change. I think it'd be interesting to put a "marinized" LS7 against a 496HO.

Here's another crazy thought applicable to GM crate motors. A buddy's father in law is working on an FAA-certified retro-fit to put "crate" LS2s in Cessnas to replace OEM Lycomings and Continentals. Nothing special done to the power plant, bolt on airplane parts, geared to run around 4000rpm at 75% cruise. These "crate" motors are running over 2000hrs TBO (time between overhaul).
YMMV

In fact many Merc engines do have only brass freeze plugs changed for marine use and clear black paint instead of flat black...prolly all this even made by GM.
One funny observation was on the 454SS pickups, they had identical engines to the Mercruiser 330...even brass freezeplugs 1990.
And I mean identical even to camgrind and intake cast numbers.

About your dads FAA certification projects, does he have to use a twin plug system?
Some years back there was a FAA certified Chevy all aluminum big block using twin plugs on GM aluminum open chamber heads.
Seeing a LS7 against a 496 HO, well the 496 would certainly meet itīs match but would there be any weight gain with the LS7 as it needs the fresh water cooling system?

Raylar 05-10-2007 08:48 AM

Here's the old crate engine marine use question again. Obviously the LS7 GM is using in the Corvette is not just any old crate engine. It is hand assembled with a with titanium connecting rods, CNC'd high flow heads, special oil pump, etc.,etc. The problem with this paticular engine for marine use is that it makes its 505HP at almost 7000rpms and its peak torque of only 440 ft/lbs at 5500 rpms which is in my opionion way to high in rpm and low on torque at to high an rpm for good non-racing high performance marine use. At a decent cruise rpm its torque would be down around 300 ft./lbs and it would be lugging. It also has cast hypereutectic pistons for noise reduction. Now take the $17,000 base price and spend another $15,000 or so fully marinizing it and you will start to see why its not going to be the ideal marine high performance motor. We studied all the LS series motors before we started our LSM550 project. What we wanted and knew only this design could give was a closed cooling all aluminum motor that weighs in fully rigged at almost 500lbs less than an aluminum headed big block with closed cooling, is about 4 inches shorter in length, 5 inches shorter in height and will produce 550HP at 5800 rpms and 500 ft/lbs of torque at 4200 rpms. It should price out in the mid to low $20k range complete with stainless headers and hardware when we release it. No crate LS engine would get us there!Remember this engine is 450 cubic inches and there's no replacement for displacement! Its always easy to speculate in "Bench Boating" what would be cool. Its much harder for marine engine developers to deliver what will really work!
We're trying.

Regards,

Ray @ Raylar

handfulz28 05-10-2007 09:27 AM

Ray, does the crate LS7 come with the variable cam timing? I'm guessing no? Would just a cam change bring the TQ/HP curves more in line to "marine" use? I personally wouldn't use a crate LS7, I'd use the same Raylar is using-the new variable cam timing engine.
I still think the LS-series motors should be the next generation of small block replacements.

MikeyFIN, no twin plug but redundant ECUs plus glass panel graphic display for engine monitoring.

MikeyFIN 05-10-2007 11:13 AM

Ray howabaout the weight difference compared to a open cooled bigblock?

And Michael yes I thought also about the camchange.
Them LS heads do flow already "like" rectangular ports on bigblocks...

Raylar 05-11-2007 10:21 AM

LS7 engines do not have any provision for nor can this feature be added for variable cam timing. A cam change would obviously bring the horsepower down and lower the torque curve and peak torque however the lower horsepower of lets say 425hp and probably only about 400 ft/lbs of torque would not make this combination a good big block substitute. The weight of our new engine is still about 400 lbs less than a open cooling big block with iron heads.

Ray @ Raylar

MikeyFIN 05-12-2007 03:07 AM

Thanks, Well that about answers my question.
But an LS7 I think would with a smaller cam still make more torque than 400.
Depending on the Big block which gets substituted well thats a question too.but thenagain a Bigblock is easy and cheap to make bigger&stronger.

Michael1 05-14-2007 01:32 AM


Originally Posted by Raylar (Post 2123011)
Here's the old crate engine marine use question again. Obviously the LS7 GM is using in the Corvette is not just any old crate engine. It is hand assembled with a with titanium connecting rods, CNC'd high flow heads, special oil pump, etc.,etc. The problem with this paticular engine for marine use is that it makes its 505HP at almost 7000rpms and its peak torque of only 440 ft/lbs at 5500 rpms which is in my opionion way to high in rpm and low on torque at to high an rpm for good non-racing high performance marine use. At a decent cruise rpm its torque would be down around 300 ft./lbs and it would be lugging.

Ray,

I am not sure where you are getting your horsepower and torque figures from. I'm looking on GM's website, and the LS7 is rated at 505 horsepower at 6300 rpm, and 470 ft-lbs at 4800 rpm. At a more typical marine rpm of 5500, it still makes 490 horsepower. It produces just over 400 ft-lbs at 2500 rpm, which I would consider quite decent for any cruising. Even at 1000 rpm, it is producing about 330 ft-lbs. These numbers are SAE certified.

Michael


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 PM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.