Like Tree0Likes

Cat Insurance Situation Has Gone Beyond Ridiculous!

Reply
Old 07-09-2007, 04:26 PM
  #41
Registered
 
Dude! Sweet!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
My Boats: Pantera 28
Posts: 1,955
Default

Out of curiosity, does say a 17 foot Eliminator Tunnel count as a Cat? And how do the insurance companies prove "experience" vs. "ownership"? I guess what I'm getting at is on paper does a 17 foot eliminator that runs at Havasu every weekend look any differnet that a 17 foot eliminator that went to the dump and just had it's registration renewed every year?

And what about a liability only policy? Any potential for reasonable prices there? Seems like it would be a good compromise between "self insurance" (aka no insurance) and buying your insurance guy a new car every year.
Dude! Sweet! is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 12:47 PM
  #42
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back4More View Post
Looks like the odds in the insurance world is that a newbe Cat owner is a bad write.
if you want insurance on your cat or any powerboat
call me 601-750-6104 i've got a co. that will insure up to 100mph and a $100000 ask for rick
rfurr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 01:07 PM
  #43
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 227
Default

I'm no big fan of insurance companies, but from what I've been told the payout from one major catamaran accident (the kind where people die) can eat up everything and more an insurance company makes in catamaran premiums in a single year. It would be nice if the problem was as simple as insurance company greed or ignorance, but it's not. Litigation plays a huge role, settlements play a huge role.

But don't feel too sorry for insurance companies. They make plenty of money on the investments they make with your premiums.

The solution? In this society, where there are no accidents and there must always be someone to blame and, more important, to extract money from? There isn't one. There are no silver bullets.

You might fly F-18s and wax Michael Schumacher in F-1 on your weekends off from Top Gun, but you're still going to pay through the nose for cat insurance.
100-Plus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:56 PM
  #44
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Knot 4 Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Central IL
My Boats: Old/Heavy/Slow
Posts: 6,658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 100-Plus View Post
But don't feel too sorry for insurance companies. They make plenty of money on the investments they make with your premiums.
Where do you think the reserves come from to cover losses due to major catastrophes? If it all came from underwriting profit your premiums would be astronomically high. It is not uncommon for some lines of business to annually produce an underwriting loss so it has to be offset by investment income.
Knot 4 Me is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 08:09 PM
  #45
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 227
Default

And don't get me wrong, Knot, I have no problem with that. I have no problem with insurance companies making the bulk of their profits from investments they make with the premiums they collect. But when they face losses, when they have to pay out, I don't feel sorry, per se, for them, either.

Insurance is a form of gambling. The insurance company is betting you won't have an accident and they won't have to pay out. You're hoping you won't have an accident, as they are, but being a realistic soul you realize that accidents happen and you need to cover your assets (pardon the pun).

Let's say Markel writes $10 million a year in high-perf boat insurance. One horrible wreck involving death in a high-end cat would easily eat that. Easily. Legal fees alone would be exorbitant. The company's entire gross profit from premiums would vanish ... in just one claim/case.

So yes, as you say, the insurance companies have to do some investing. In a way, investing is their primary business. They just raise investment capital through premiums.

As I understand it, the whole insurance concept came out of China, where junkt owners on the Yangtzhe River created a pool of money for anyone who lost on junkt on the river. That way, no shipper's business would be destroyed by a single accident. In a way, it was a weird and ultimately successful blend of capitalism and communism.
100-Plus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 11:03 PM
  #46
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Newbury Park, CA
Posts: 1,425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 100-Plus View Post
Let's say Markel writes $10 million a year in high-perf boat insurance. One horrible wreck involving death in a high-end cat would easily eat that. Easily. Legal fees alone would be exorbitant. The company's entire gross profit from premiums would vanish ... in just one claim/case.
Not counting legal fees, wouldn't the claim for one incident be limited to $300K or $500K (the maximum liability limit for the policy)?

Also don't let you insurance company see your screen name.

Michael
Michael1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 11:40 PM
  #47
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 227
Default

Michael,

I'm not sure. I believe that depends on the policy. Not an insurance guy, just know a few of them.

100-Plus, hey, that's an age thing, right?
100-Plus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Maritime_Eng
Insurance and Finance
20
07-11-2007 11:01 PM
jwall
Eliminator
40
01-10-2006 06:34 PM
Chris288
Trucks, Trailers and Transportation
68
11-18-2005 10:03 AM
Bo
General Boating Discussion
3
07-02-2005 10:18 PM
Cat-n-Around
General Boating Discussion
10
02-09-2005 06:34 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 AM.


Copyright 2011 OffShoreOnly. All rights reserved.