Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question.......... >

Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........

Notices

Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........

Old 12-20-2007, 07:32 PM
  #21  
Forum Regulator
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Sydwayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 23,828
Received 1,195 Likes on 519 Posts
Default

You guys focused on the picture too much! Too many pretty colors!

Items 1-4 on my post were in order of importance.
Sydwayz is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 07:37 PM
  #22  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Semper Fi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sydwayz
WHOAH Gerrard!! You opened up a can here!

There are a LOT of things that matter.

1. Weight is a bigger factor than anything.
2. The step itself is not what makes a boat faster. Its the natural pitch or trim that it places the thrust, as well as depth in the water in relation to the weight being pushed or displaced.
3. There are so many bottom designs out there, that you CAN'T generally title one as better (fast/ride/efficiency) than the other based on categorical design. You have to take into account strakes, hook, rocker, tabs, etc. etc.
4. Multiple steps are actually slower a single step; and a straight bottom should be faster. (Given ALL things equal, but how could you accomplish that?) Think of it in plumbing terms. If point A and point B are exactly 8' apart, and you have three equal diameter tubes to pour 2 gallons of water through; which one do you think is going to empty First? Second? Third?

Thanks for the analogy. I wasn't hoping to open up a can of worms.....just thought that it's an interesting subject! Hey, it's wintertime
Semper Fi is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 07:50 PM
  #23  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Semper Fi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BAJA WILL
Velocity, are much lighter than similar boats with the same power and size, they are usually 15-20% lighter. Thus faster.

On a personal note WOT stepps don't even matter, how much of a boat is in the water at WOT, about 20" in the rear, way past the step, however a pad can make a huge diff.

Just my 2 cents

WILL
Baja-- I think you may have a point. I was just looking at a few different boats as comparisons.....

38 Fountain - 9,800lbs
38 Cigarette - 9,900lbs
39 Nor-Tech - 9,200 lbs
38 Hustler - 8,500 lbs
39 Velocity - 8,000 lbs

In the smaller boats (under 30') the weight difference is alot smaller, if any
Semper Fi is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 08:07 PM
  #24  
Registered
 
mikes280's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: charlotte nc.
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i would be will to bet that none of those weight's are close to right on those boats. not saying you are wrong and i know you got them from the manf. but i bet they are not close
mikes280 is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 08:15 PM
  #25  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Semper Fi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mikes280
i would be will to bet that none of those weight's are close to right on those boats. not saying you are wrong and i know you got them from the manf. but i bet they are not close
Mike,

I couldn't say for sure, as I was getting the weights off each own manufacturers websites
Semper Fi is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 08:21 PM
  #26  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Columbia S.C.
Posts: 1,540
Received 72 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

I enjoyed the thread and the various explanations on hull design and performance. I have a pad velocity and wondered how the pad would perform against multi step hulls at WOT. Thanks for the explanations guys. Merry Christmas!!!!!!!!!!
bulletbob is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 08:27 PM
  #27  
Registered
 
mikes280's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: charlotte nc.
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Semper Fi
Mike,

I couldn't say for sure, as I was getting the weights off each own manufacturers websites
i know you did but what i have found is they all tend to lie a little about weight. some thank that heavy is stronger so they say theres is heavy and some say that light is faster so they do the same.
mikes280 is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 09:52 PM
  #28  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Newbury Park, CA
Posts: 1,495
Received 47 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PARADOX
Velosity's rakes and ribs are not true parallel to the sides or the bottom / keel, they divert some of the water to the outside so the boat stay more on top. (I don't know what the deadrise is) Less friction = speed.
I don't follow how diverting water to the outside is going to lift the boat. If anything, it would think it would cause it to drop in the hole left by the diverted water, and plow even more water.

Michael
Michael1 is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:32 PM
  #29  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,796
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Hard to draw with a mouse, sorry, but I think you got the idea.
"A" standar design, "B" hyperbolic and faster. more lift, more air, less friction.
Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........-v-bot.bmp
PARADOX is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:33 PM
  #30  
Charter Member #232
Charter Member
 
Audiofn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Carlisle, MA USA
Posts: 18,422
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Have you ever seen a really fast V-hull boat? The thing is running on the back 2 or so feet of the boat (LESS on smaller boats like a hydrostream). My old hydrostream actually rode on the bullet of the lower unit more so then the bottom of the boat. At that spead and angle of attack the steps would do nothing in the way of reduced drag. I would think that they would hurt by adding wind turbulence.
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Audiofn is offline  

Quick Reply: Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.