Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
540 stroker,,DUD engine, dont do it. >

540 stroker,,DUD engine, dont do it.

Notices

540 stroker,,DUD engine, dont do it.

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-28-2008, 08:37 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 540 stroker,,DUD engine, dont do it.

Im in the process of building a gen VI 502. I had mentioned stroking it to 540 cu in to four different engine builder friends of mine. Top notch guys who have been doing this for longer then I have been alive, (38 yrs) Was told by all that a short deck 540 would have excessive piston wear and wouldnt make good power. After running both packages through a reliable computer program in order to pick a cam it turned out the 502 030 over made more torque and HP then the 540. Heard 557 is the ticket? Anybody have one for a while?
PIT BULL is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 09:00 PM
  #2  
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
 
Griff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Omaha/LOTO
Posts: 19,558
Received 1,821 Likes on 907 Posts
Default

Engine builders or MARINE engine builders??????

The 540 is more capable of making more hp and torque than a 509.
Griff is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 09:03 PM
  #3  
Diamond Member #001
Charter Member
iTrader: (2)
 
C_Spray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Coastal North Carolina
Posts: 4,808
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I guess it depends on how hard you're going to run it. I have 400 hours on a set of Innovation 600 hp short-deck 540's....
__________________
Retired! Boating full-time now.
C_Spray is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 09:05 PM
  #4  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oshvegas WI
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

in the marine word.......".theres no replacement for displacement"
JUKED YOU is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 12:32 AM
  #5  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (1)
 
articfriends's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: frankenmuth michigan
Posts: 7,140
Received 814 Likes on 373 Posts
Default

My "short deck" 540 made 657Hp with mpi fuel injection and only 8.1-1 compression N/A and 1115hp with the procharger bolted on,I would buy a new computer program or change the info your putting into it because somethings flawed,haven't heard of any marine 502's or 509's out performing 540's,Smitty
articfriends is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 01:04 AM
  #6  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
KAAMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Western Michigan
Posts: 4,464
Received 78 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PIT BULL
Im in the process of building a gen VI 502. I had mentioned stroking it to 540 cu in to four different engine builder friends of mine. Top notch guys who have been doing this for longer then I have been alive, (38 yrs) Was told by all that a short deck 540 would have excessive piston wear and wouldnt make good power. Anybody have one for a while?
I used to think/hear the same thing years ago before I had my 4.25" stroked short deck engines built. A tall deck is nice, but not necessary. I guess it depends on who you talk to. My people tell me the BB Chevy short deck with 4.25" stroke isn't the greatest rod/stroke angle, but at 5500-6000rpm it isn't chit and no concern for wear. Now a short deck with a 4.50" stroke is a place I probably wouldn't go---don't hear much about those for marine engines.
KAAMA is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 06:25 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

A 540 combo in a short deck block is absolutely no problem. I have built many 4.250 stroke , short deck engines and all run excellent with ZERO wear problems of any kind. Our 1 X 4 540 marine N/A package makes 750 HP effortlessly. If your using a Dart block you may want to consider going to a 4.560 bore. This will give you better breathing on the cylinder heads and make a bit more power. You will still have plenty of cylinder life with the block . (max bore 4.630)
mrhorsepower1 is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 10:00 AM
  #8  
Registered
 
Fountain38SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Oh
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've got blown 540's with over 200 hours and no problems. A friend has N/A 540's putting out 625 with loads of hours. His tunnel rams are very nice. I think you should talk to some of the major engine builders. Call Tommy @ Chief, great guy and builder, he won't steer you wrong. I would STAY AWAY for whoever you are talking to now! Just my .02.
Fountain38SC is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 10:05 AM
  #9  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Biggus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Naples, Maine
Posts: 6,304
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

A buddy's got a low-deck 540, 871 blown, 850 hp. 400 hrs, never been apart, works very well.
Biggus is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 05:11 PM
  #10  
I hate the winter!!
Platinum Member
 
Vinny P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: long island, new york
Posts: 2,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am running a Dart Big M 9.800" deck height, Callies Magnum 4.25" crank, Lunati 6.385" rods, Mahle 4.5" pistons. Makes 725 hp with no problems, n/a, 9.25 compression.
Vinny P is offline  


Quick Reply: 540 stroker,,DUD engine, dont do it.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.