Notices

Awesome!

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-22-2008, 05:26 PM
  #11  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Semper Fi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Strip Poker 388
I would think the TQ curve would have a factor,but again the weight is a bunch of diff!!
Strip- the PB Mag article mentions the torque curve - at 3,000 rpm it makes 500 ft pounds of tq- it also says "with electronic variable cam timing, we can build a torque curve that's almost like a diesel engine, but with a much wider rpm range.
Semper Fi is offline  
Old 08-22-2008, 05:55 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
rhsj2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4mulafastech
Apparently this 292 has them. I sure would like to see a performance write-up on that rig!

http://www.boatshop24.com/web/en/suc...totalcount=157
Strange thing about that boat - I wonder if it actually exists. If you look at the pictures on that site, every pic appears to be a different boat - Paint scheme doesn't match in any of the 2 pictures...

Maybe 'if you buy it, they will build it'...
rhsj2006 is offline  
Old 08-22-2008, 06:02 PM
  #13  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Mercury's (Noah's?) formula for speed is:

Hull efficiency (Assume 250 for a late model V-hull)
______________________ (divided by)

Square root of:

total weight
________________________
HP

As a base line, an 8500 vee hull with fuel and 2 passengers with twin 525 EFI (really 540HP ea +/-) with a "250" hull efficiency = 89.1 MPH (hull efficiency is a constant)

The same twin engine "Rayar powered" boat (assumes right balance) with same 1080 HP but 1000 lbs less (7500 lbs) total weight = 94.9 MPH

Maybe Raylar just needs a better marketing program...
BenPerfected is offline  
Old 08-23-2008, 12:45 AM
  #14  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice, where is raylar located?
HIMES(JAIME) is offline  
Old 08-23-2008, 09:19 AM
  #15  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington, MO
Posts: 1,442
Received 19 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rhsj2006
Strange thing about that boat - I wonder if it actually exists. If you look at the pictures on that site, every pic appears to be a different boat - Paint scheme doesn't match in any of the 2 pictures...

Maybe 'if you buy it, they will build it'...
Yes, that is what I suspect as well. I would love to open one of the performance magazines and see a detailed write-up on that very combination (and I'm sure you would too!) I would think if Raylar provided a sweet deal to one of the big Formula dealers, and the combintation lives up to the performance we anticipate, that would really create more interest and drive new business.
4mulafastech is offline  
Old 08-23-2008, 09:45 AM
  #16  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Raleigh,NC & 1000 Islands,NY
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have been talking about these motors on here in a couple different threads...they are awesome!!
If Raylar wanted some excellent exposure they would rig my 28 Active Thunder with twins and some Imco drives and I could demo for as many customers as they wanted!!
That would be a perfect application for those 550's!
spilman is offline  
Old 08-23-2008, 01:56 PM
  #17  
Rob
VIP Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Strip Poker 388's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ms
Posts: 21,632
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Semper Fi
Strip- the PB Mag article mentions the torque curve - at 3,000 rpm it makes 500 ft pounds of tq- it also says "with electronic variable cam timing, we can build a torque curve that's almost like a diesel engine, but with a much wider rpm range.

pretty good TQ for a sb,so it would be close to a big block
__________________
.

The Only Time You Have To Much Ammo Is When Your Swimming Or On Fire.
Strip Poker 388 is offline  
Old 08-23-2008, 02:09 PM
  #18  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington, MO
Posts: 1,442
Received 19 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spilman
I have been talking about these motors on here in a couple different threads...they are awesome!!
If Raylar wanted some excellent exposure they would rig my 28 Active Thunder with twins and some Imco drives and I could demo for as many customers as they wanted!!
That would be a perfect application for those 550's!
Now that would be a nice package and should really fly! What does a 28 AT weigh in at? A 292 is heavy at 7500 lbs dry, although it does have twin steps...
4mulafastech is offline  
Old 08-23-2008, 02:17 PM
  #19  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lake Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TexomaPowerboater
That is a bad azz engine. Maybe after some more guinea pigs report good results I'd take a closer look.

You're in the perfect situation! oink oink lol
bert4332 is offline  
Old 08-23-2008, 02:55 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,495
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Semper Fi
However, Mercury Racing lists the HP 525 EFI at 1,152 lbs- The HP 700 SCi weighs 1,326 lbs! - (these weights are without the drives!!) The Raylar 550 is WAY LIGHTER
Unless they're making them entirely from depleted uranium, those numbers are way high. A pan-to-carb BBC weighs about 600 lbs.

Those numbers have to be drives, gimbals, and a fully-dressed engine, from exhaust manifolds to coolers, pumps, alternator, etc.
Chris Sunkin is offline  


Quick Reply: Awesome!


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.