![]() |
Originally Posted by JCPERF
(Post 2717683)
Dustin I need a R980:grinser010:
|
Thanks for all the info, i'm more confused then before. For every plus there is a minus. I need dependability. Mercedes has been really happy with the coverage we have gotten for them. They want to be more involved and want us to do some other things. I have had a lot of down time this past year, (not for any one reason) but that was a something brought up in our meeting. I have to figure out the best way for me to go. I appreciate all the feedback.
|
Originally Posted by Whipple Charged
(Post 2717694)
Yes, the 5.0 has made 1650hp on gasoline. The 8.3 is the same supercharger. I've said this a thousand times. The difference, if you drive the male rotor, its a 5.0. If you drive the female rotor, its a 8.3. Therefore, if you spin the 8.3 to 12,000, it's the same as spinning the 5.0 to 19,920. So, with that in mind, if you drive (from crankshaft) the female rotor and spin it 12,000, the male rotor will be rotating at 19,920. If you drive the male rotor and turn it 19,920, then the female rotor will be turning 12,000.
The 8.3 is not unproven, it's worked just fine. It will make all the HP the PSI can make, and it also depends on which PSI, since there's a few versions, some are not nearly as good as others (designs), not to mention from one SC to the next. The only advantage the PSI has for power is that you run so a huge opening flowing through the SC. Our rear entry can flow a bunch of air, but it's pretty hard to compare to the massive injector hat. It's pretty darn close, and I've gotten it to where I feel confident the 8.3 will out perform the PSI. Dustin The 980 was the best! |
Originally Posted by Whipple Charged
(Post 2717374)
They certainly made some sick power, but it was also 22psi of boost! Its very, very hard to have a reliable engine package on gasoline with 22psi. I think power would be closer to mid 1500 to low 1600 with 15psi which is still great. Turbo's at this point would be near the 2000hp range (22psi) but turbo lag is extremely difficult to get around as well as low end torque, and lets face it, some of these big boats with big props, high gears need lots of torque down low.
Dustin Dustin, I believe you know Tom Earhart................... 572's Twin Turbo's 21 Lbs of boost 1,500 hp. Very Low compression. Full EFI and they are very fuel effiecient. NO Turbo lag, boost at 1,500 rpms NEVER any problems with the bottom end and the valve train is changed every 250 hours. How is that for reliable?? Tom has an incredible package and so gentle all at the same time. And there is something about a V-bottom out accelerating a CAT that........... Well always raises question marks. Ask Check300 he runs Tom's engine too. I think the dyno sheets would blow your mind for low end torque and no turbo lag. Tom has it figured out!! :drink: Jon |
Originally Posted by WildWarrior
(Post 2717442)
Its stating to get old we just blew our Starboard drysump 6 on Tuesday.
We are pulling it later today, thats 5 drives in two seasons. The down side to our sick acceleration rush! Many 40-50's running turbines with 1800 hp with no problems.Might want to look at a different drive builder. Just my 2 |
Originally Posted by JCPERF
(Post 2717688)
Ready to go 203 in a 46:cool:
|
Originally Posted by RunninHotRacing158
(Post 2717800)
Niiiice now thats what im talkin bout :ernaehrung004::ernaehrung004:
|
Originally Posted by HotPursuit
(Post 2717825)
Did Randy deduct for your senior citizen discount!! :evilb:
|
Originally Posted by cougarman
(Post 2717772)
Dustin,
I believe you know Tom Earhart................... 572's Twin Turbo's 21 Lbs of boost 1,500 hp. Very Low compression. Full EFI and they are very fuel effiecient. NO Turbo lag, boost at 1,500 rpms NEVER any problems with the bottom end and the valve train is changed every 250 hours. How is that for reliable?? Tom has an incredible package and so gentle all at the same time. And there is something about a V-bottom out accelerating a CAT that........... Well always raises question marks. Ask Check300 he runs Tom's engine too. I think the dyno sheets would blow your mind for low end torque and no turbo lag. Tom has it figured out!! :drink: Jon Jon, I don't know Tom E. Turbo's can make insane hp, but never, ever can it match the throttle response and low end torque. Simply can't. You can use all the tricks you want, all the different versions, which again will make insane hp, but cannot fill the cylinder as fast as a efficient positive displacement sc. I've been part of some big projects and I've seen them very close, but they're not the same. Certainly not the lag of the old days if done right, but its still dependent on the airflow through the exhaust. I'm 1 person who never knocks turbos. They make great power and are great products, just anything, there's good and bad setups, but when done right, they're hard to compete with. Dustin |
Originally Posted by KNOT-RIGHT
(Post 2717668)
He needs more then that 1400hp my friend.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Lubejob,
Y are you fighting the inevitable. This is the only blower you need, and you know it. Give me a call.
Originally Posted by LubeJobs42
(Post 2717708)
Thanks for all the info, i'm more confused then before. For every plus there is a minus. I need dependability. Mercedes has been really happy with the coverage we have gotten for them. They want to be more involved and want us to do some other things. I have had a lot of down time this past year, (not for any one reason) but that was a something brought up in our meeting. I have to figure out the best way for me to go. I appreciate all the feedback.
|
Originally Posted by J Arruda
(Post 2718005)
Lubejob,
Y are you fighting the inevitable. This is the only blower you need, and you know it. Give me a call. |
that is pretty reliable power. :drink:
|
Originally Posted by J Arruda
(Post 2718005)
Lubejob,
Y are you fighting the inevitable. This is the only blower you need, and you know it. Give me a call. Lets see if hes got the Cunyongas:drink: |
I Put A Few More Pics In The Photo Section, How Do You Post Them Here?
I Added In My Psi Blown Combo.. 58 Lbs Of Boost |
Originally Posted by HotPursuit
(Post 2717792)
You guys need to bring that Talon out to some of the large poker runs and hook up with some of the big guns. I dont think 1400 hp should be breaking drives,maybe shorting the life.
Many 40-50's running turbines with 1800 hp with no problems.Might want to look at a different drive builder. Just my 2 Hopefully we will finally land a larger more efficient hull this Winter and partake in some of the out of State rain deer games in the Spring,that would be fun! This heavy rig with 11% slip factor is set up more as a drag boat at this point and is out of hull in the mid 150s not in the same league as the big boys. Tuesday's failure was a snapped prop shaft ,not an explosion. Craig Colabella is one of the best #6 guy's we know and is keeping us out every week. Craig also agrees that #6s are not designed to handle the sustained torque that some of us are throwing at our rigs on a weekly basis especially on a heavy less efficient hull like ours. Sorry for the high jack Gino! |
Originally Posted by Whipple Charged
(Post 2717838)
Jon,
I don't know Tom E. Turbo's can make insane hp, but never, ever can it match the throttle response and low end torque. Simply can't. You can use all the tricks you want, all the different versions, which again will make insane hp, but cannot fill the cylinder as fast as a efficient positive displacement sc. I've been part of some big projects and I've seen them very close, but they're not the same. Certainly not the lag of the old days if done right, but its still dependent on the airflow through the exhaust. I'm 1 person who never knocks turbos. They make great power and are great products, just anything, there's good and bad setups, but when done right, they're hard to compete with. Dustin So if your throttling the waves less than 1,300 rpm's I guess you do have a problem. :drink: Like I said Tom has it figured out and well aware most other's don't. There is no Lag, ZERO, NONE. So care to compare Dyno sheet's from 1,500 to 3,000 ? 30' Single Engine Checkmate, 6.4:1 compression, 21 lbs of boost ..... Boat, Rocks !! #6 Drive 1.24 gear 29 p Prop Cheers Jon |
Originally Posted by cougarman
(Post 2718163)
Really ?? Care to compare dyno sheets from 1,500 to 3000 Rpm's ?? Can race from complete stop or 35 mph if your worried about your drive. Guess I need to correct yestedays post too,..............Boost comes on a 1,300 rpm's
So if your throttling the waves less than 1,300 rpm's I guess you do have a problem. :drink: Like I said Tom has it figured out and well aware most other's don't. There is no Lag, ZERO, NONE. So care to compare Dyno sheet's from 1,500 to 3,000 ? 30' Single Engine Checkmate, 6.4:1 compression, 21 lbs of boost ..... Boat, Rocks !! #6 Drive 1.24 gear 29 p Prop Cheers Jon |
Originally Posted by J Arruda
(Post 2718005)
Lubejob,
Y are you fighting the inevitable. This is the only blower you need, and you know it. Give me a call. LOL :ernaehrung004: |
a turbine powered Jeep that runs on nitro ... lol
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by J Arruda
(Post 2718005)
Lubejob,
Y are you fighting the inevitable. This is the only blower you need, and you know it. Give me a call. Come dance on the dark side my friend...... |
Funniest post all day:drink:
Originally Posted by J Arruda
(Post 2718005)
Lubejob,
Y are you fighting the inevitable. This is the only blower you need, and you know it. Give me a call. |
Originally Posted by Whipple Charged
(Post 2718432)
Good to hear he defyed the laws of physics, good for him. I've never had a dyno hold any power below 3000rpm, but I can tell you I've been in a few boats that required WOT at 1200rpm to get the boat going without ventilators in the prop areas.
Are you saying you can't produce the numbers then? I'm willing to cover your airfare out here, Show you the dyno numbers real time, and give you a ride showing there is NO Lag. If my statements do not prove out you owe nothing. If my claims hold true and we prove the low end numbers plus carry them all the way through and give you a ride showing there is no lag at all. Well then you pay for your air fare and let OSO know these claims are indeed true. :drink: So what do ya say to that offer??? By they way pops right on plane effortlessly with out a ventilator tube. Cheers Jon |
Originally Posted by PatriYacht
(Post 2716977)
What about something like this? Low profile and Tomcat tested it at Sterling at something like 1800 hp. http://www.rtechperformance.com/biggun.html
6800 peek ,boost at 22pd :eek: I know alot of the street car shoot out guys are useing that style blower,But look at all the big hp makers are still using top mount blowers |
Originally Posted by Maximus
(Post 2718596)
Ha I knew it too Gino. if 1850 a side isn't enough........ you can super size it with 3150 HP a side. (below) :)
Come dance on the dark side my friend...... with the biggie fryes too:drink: |
2 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Maximus
(Post 2718596)
Ha I knew it too Gino. if 1850 a side isn't enough........ you can super size it with 3150 HP a side. (below) :)
Come dance on the dark side my friend...... |
he has em
Originally Posted by KNOT-RIGHT
(Post 2718079)
YEAH!
Lets see if hes got the Cunyongas:drink: |
Hi Gino: I got your email. Paul will be in Key West so you can discuss the details with him.
Some food for thought for this thread: Heat Load Boost is just a measure of how restrictive your heads and cam are. An engine that makes 1500 HP @ 15 psi needs 22 psi to make 1800 HP. So the question is "How to deal with the high intake air temperatures at this pressure?" By using an intercooler core that is 900 in3, almost 3X as big as the double core intercooler used under some PSI. Mechanical Load With the pulley ratio on the primary belt, the input shaft on the twin blower gearcase is spinning at ~12,000 RPM. With the pulley ratio on the secondary belts, the input shafts on the blowers are spinning at ~15,000 RPM. The Vortech step-up ratio takes this up to ~50,000 RPM at the impeller. These are big numbers, and belts and bearings have to be able to cope. We have found that it helps to split this load up between three short belts, but we still increased the size of the bearings in the gearcase and switched to ceramic balls. Cylinder Pressure At 1800 HP you have to ask how much more cylinder pressure can the engine stand? I would really like to see a robust 12 cylinder engine developed for this application. 50% more cylinders to share the work and 50% more holes to push the air through. On such a platform the goal would be 2000 HP @ 6000 RPM and 15 psi. I guess it's a sign of the times; I'm starting to value reliability more than speed. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Whipple Charged
(Post 2717838)
Jon,
I don't know Tom E. Turbo's can make insane hp, but never, ever can it match the throttle response and low end torque. Simply can't. You can use all the tricks you want, all the different versions, which again will make insane hp, but cannot fill the cylinder as fast as a efficient positive displacement sc. I've been part of some big projects and I've seen them very close, but they're not the same. Certainly not the lag of the old days if done right, but its still dependent on the airflow through the exhaust. I'm 1 person who never knocks turbos. They make great power and are great products, just anything, there's good and bad setups, but when done right, they're hard to compete with. Dustin Just finished some testing with Tom Robinson of R-Tech. Very inteligent man, great guy to work with and great product that really works well. We will post some number's once we get some more data. But it was really nice of Tom to take the time to drive here from Canada and be a part of this. Below is a picture of Check300's engine pulled out for the winter for cam research Hence testing intercooler's at the same time. Old cam we started pulling and making boost at 1,750 Rpm's, New cam we started pulling and making boost at 1,850. R-Tech's product really increased the bottom end and mid range too. Boost can be made low and the throttle response is NOT lacking in any way shape or form with this set-up! Anybody pursuing intercooler's etc., really need to get in touch with R-Tech !! Thanks Jon |
Are those Dana's exhaust manifolds that you modified?
|
Originally Posted by cougarman
(Post 2795316)
Just finished some testing with Tom Robinson of R-Tech.
Very inteligent man, great guy to work with and great product that really works well. We will post some number's once we get some more data. But it was really nice of Tom to take the time to drive here from Canada and be a part of this. Below is a picture of Check300's engine pulled out for the winter for cam research Hence testing intercooler's at the same time. Old cam we started pulling and making boost at 1,750 Rpm's, New cam we started pulling and making boost at 1,850. R-Tech's product really increased the bottom end and mid range too. Boost can be made low and the throttle response is NOT lacking in any way shape or form with this set-up! Anybody pursuing intercooler's etc., really need to get in touch with R-Tech !! Thanks Jon Nice! :cool: |
Hey cougarman, what are the turbo specs?
|
1 Attachment(s)
Gino, How bout a pr. of these 540's ??? Plenty of hatch clearance, don't need any scoops on top. They run on 87 octane, and they made 1350 hp. @ 11 lbs. Totally turnkey. Add a few more lbs to em, put in some 93, and they'll see way over the 1500 mark.
They were run on 110 with I believe about 17-18 lbs, and they did around 1850. If you're still lookin, call me and I'll hook you up with the guy that has a few pairs of them just sitting waiting for a boat. As a matter of fact, he'll be in Fla this week for the boat show, you can talk to him in person. One pr. are 598's, and I know another pr. are 540's, not sure about the 3rd pr. I know that one pr. already has gone into a 40 Skater up here, but it was'nt till Dec, and lake Michigan was gettin too cold for testing. Another pr. "might" be spoken for to go in a bigger cat, but it's not defineate as we speak. |
Originally Posted by saxman
(Post 2717224)
No need for anything else. Just set the pulleys on the PSI's for whatever amount of power you want!
|
Originally Posted by 10x
(Post 2795564)
Gino, How bout a pr. of these 540's ??? Plenty of hatch clearance, don't need any scoops on top. They run on 87 octane, and they made 1350 hp. @ 11 lbs. Totally turnkey. Add a few more lbs to em, put in some 93, and they'll see way over the 1500 mark.
They were run on 110 with I believe about 17-18 lbs, and they did around 1850. If you're still lookin, call me and I'll hook you up with the guy that has a few pairs of them just sitting waiting for a boat. As a matter of fact, he'll be in Fla this week for the boat show, you can talk to him in person. One pr. are 598's, and I know another pr. are 540's, not sure about the 3rd pr. I know that one pr. already has gone into a 40 Skater up here, but it was'nt till Dec, and lake Michigan was gettin too cold for testing. Another pr. "might" be spoken for to go in a bigger cat, but it's not defineate as we speak. |
Originally Posted by thunderusone
(Post 2795430)
Are those Dana's exhaust manifolds that you modified?
Yes they are. :drink: Jon |
Originally Posted by Jigsaw89
(Post 2795560)
Hey cougarman, what are the turbo specs?
68 mm turbo's, and with the 7 pound spring in for cam testing and R-Tech testing it's making 7 pounds of boost at 1,750 Rpm's :drink: When we put the the normal 21 pound spring in it is making in the the area of 10 plus....pounds of boost at 1,750 RPM's:eek: As Earhart would say she's ready to HUNT :ernaehrung004: Thanks Jon |
Originally Posted by cougarman
(Post 2796533)
68 mm turbo's, and with the 7 pound spring in for cam testing and R-Tech testing it's making 7 pounds of boost at 1,750 Rpm's :drink:
When we put the the normal 21 pound spring in it is making in the the area of 10 plus....pounds of boost at 1,750 RPM's:eek: As Earhart would say she's ready to HUNT :ernaehrung004: Thanks Jon Are you hoping to sell the motor package above??? No matter how much power it might make, it looks like poo...:eek: Have you tested this package in anything other than a 30 Checkmate????:rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by 40FlatDeck
(Post 2797051)
Are you hoping to sell the motor package above???
No matter how much power it might make, it looks like poo...:eek: Have you tested this package in anything other than a 30 Checkmate????:rolleyes: This is straight off the dyno, and going back in Bill's boat. Main agenda is to let people know there is a Turbo package that finally works despite the beliefs associated with turbo's. This one is in Check300's 30' V-Bottom Earhart has one in his Eliminator Cat And there are a few more being built for Offshore and I believe you will be impressed with the new packaging.:drink: Thanks Jon |
Gino,
You have 1500 a side now with those Sterlings. The Vortechs and Prochargers are not the way to go. Joey learned that the hard way with those 1700's. I honestly think you need to go turbine if you want more than 1500 hp out of an combustion engine in a boat. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.