ROTAX454

And over on BoatFreaks, I was told (after removing my post) that these two were working things out. That was sometime ago and by the posts here, those two are still at it. My money is on the idea of "He has spendt the money".

I got $20 bucks that says (and you can quote me):
LDD AND PROSTOCK WILL NOT HAVE NOT RESOLVED THIS BY 4-1-09

Why you ask am I so confident? I have 670 and counting posts that validates my bet.

fund razor

I disagree. Not trash. Too concrete. Too easy to grasp.
You need something more elusive....

That smelly liquid that accumulates in the bottom of a dumpster behind a bad restaurant. Try that.

ZP'd

Here's a idea for Dumb Dumb Duck.
No neeed for a bunch of wasted time ...
No need to contact or have Prostock contact you.

JUST SEND BACK THE 14K MINUS THE 2K DEPOSIT !!!

WHAT is so hard about this that you can't figure out?

nordic95

Im sure we will see real soon how LDD wants to resolve this.Prostock and LDD have been in comunication with each other and they should have a resolve today.That is if LDD mans up and pays what Prostock will except.So lets hope LDD sees the errors of his ways and really wants to show us he is not a bad guy after all.

Nordic95

Powerplay25

Of course you are counting on the fact that he still HAS the money. Or not......

spilman

Exaaaactly!......I'd bet NOT

long duck dong

STFU already about "IF" I have "THE MONEY"....who the f*ck are you to assume anything?.....Did you not see pictures of my home and cars?....what in your wildest idiotic lamest assumption would make any of you think "IF" I have the money...

Prostock didnt get your PM until now, I cant check my work email from my home computer after the email is pulled from the mail server to my work computer..... I left my outlook express open on my computer at the office...I will check it first thing in the morning and respond...

The rest of you need to STFU, mind your own business and back up and let progress be made toward a resolution.

long duck dong

With all due respect Anthony, you also need to help tone it down....Its not about what Prostock wants, and its not about what I want.....It's about what we mutually agree is fair....if he and I can not mutually agree then we can start pointing the finger in who made error.... .I asked him for his logic behind his settlement figure so I can try and understand and justify his perspective. Hopefully he will take into consideration my perspective and make an effort to see things from my view....If we both can see where each other stand and come up with a $$$ figure we are both happy with we are good... If not we are back at square one....

fund razor

Pictures of cars and houses are not proof of money held, they are proof of money spent. Receipts for purchases and expenses are not wealth.
In fact.... it could be logically argued that those things are evidence that a young man is tapped out.

Maybe if you had a bunch of pictures of income producing assets, people could assume that you refusal to pay the kid back is due to a shortage of ethics rather than a shortage of cash.

stainless

Perfect!