Notices

Banks Engine At PRI Show

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-09-2009, 11:25 AM
  #11  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the blower disengages after a certain rpm. The way I've seen these twin charged systems work is the blower takes up the boost in the low rpm range. That allows you to fit bigger turbos with no lag. The supercharger boosts the low end, and then once the turbos are spinning, the S/C is disengaged and bypassed completely.
freshwaterfiend is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 11:26 AM
  #12  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
cougarman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

So why not go this route and have ZERO LAG ?

Boost comes on under 1,800 RPMS


Thanks
Jon
Attached Thumbnails Banks Engine At PRI Show-check300-5.jpg   Banks Engine At PRI Show-check300-6.jpg   Banks Engine At PRI Show-check300-7.jpg  

Banks Engine At PRI Show-pa310196.jpg   Banks Engine At PRI Show-pa310197.jpg  
cougarman is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 11:42 AM
  #13  
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Dean Ferry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Merritt Is. Fl. USA
Posts: 7,212
Received 393 Likes on 141 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cougarman
So why not go this route and have ZERO LAG ?

Boost comes on under 1,800 RPMS


Thanks
Jon
Wow,
Wild looking engine, Who build it and what power is it making?
thanks,
Dean
__________________
Everything is for sale @ a certain $$
Dean Ferry is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 11:55 AM
  #14  
GLH
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
GLH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 15,272
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

How much does it weight?
GLH is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 11:56 AM
  #15  
A to Z
Platinum Member
 
Sean H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: KC/LOTO
Posts: 9,156
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by cougarman
So why not go this route and have ZERO LAG ?

Boost comes on under 1,800 RPMS


Thanks
Jon
because they wanted a diesel.
Sean H is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 02:28 PM
  #16  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
cougarman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dean Ferry
Wow,
Wild looking engine, Who build it and what power is it making?
thanks,
Dean
Tom Earhart ( Michigan )

1,500 Hp

1,200 F.T LBS. of Torque at 2,200 rpm's


Thanks
Jon
cougarman is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 02:41 PM
  #17  
Registered
 
KNOT-RIGHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Providence,RI
Posts: 3,359
Received 156 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=cougarman;3003384]Tom Earhart ( Michigan )

1,500 Hp

1,200 F.T LBS. of Torque at 2,200 rpm's


Thanks
J

I wonder if these are going in a big Cougar.
KNOT-RIGHT is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 05:40 PM
  #18  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
cougarman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sean H
because they wanted a diesel.


Sean,

I brought the question about cause not everyone has the no turbo lag figured out. Tom Earhart does.

I respect Mr. Banks and his accomplishments, and the engine is a nice looking piece. However it's that much more to maintain with two different rotating induction systems.

Anyways there was plenty of people on this thread asking about comparison's to gas, carrying the RPM's out furthur etc.

Not looking to take away from anyone, but rather show the options out there. A cleaner option, a much less complicated option. The technology is here also, fully computer controlled, fuel injected etc.


So take it for what it's worth, cause I think in the near future you will see more and more of these


Take Care

Jon
cougarman is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 05:44 PM
  #19  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
cougarman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=KNOT-RIGHT;3003393]
Originally Posted by cougarman
Tom Earhart ( Michigan )

1,500 Hp

1,200 F.T LBS. of Torque at 2,200 rpm's


Thanks
J

I wonder if these are going in a big Cougar.


Hey Gerry,

This is in a single engine application, 30' with a #6 drive. And 35 mph to 109 mph in about 12 seconds with the latest testing in late November. There's more in it, but they were running out of lake real quick


Would be Trick for the Cougar though.


Jon
cougarman is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 07:55 PM
  #20  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Freehold, NJ
Posts: 1,397
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

It's been a long time since I agree with anyone's attempts to make a practical performance marine diesel.

I wrote about similar on here a couple times, blowers on top of 7.3's, it's nice to see the Banks team finally address the low end power problems.

FYI, it's not lag that the blower solves it's lack of heat to be able to spool up any type of turbo charging starting from idle with a large load on it.

You guys make these comparisons to gas engines and you simply can not do that. The diesel has to be geared much taller than a gas engine to get equal prop speed because the top end rpm's are so much lower. Therefore the load on the engine coming off of idle is much greater.

Put anyone of your turbo charged gas engines in a car, put the car in high gear 1:1 like a diesel would be and punch the gas from idle - the engine dies if not stalls. That is how it is for a diesel in high performance boat with a fully submerged surfacing propeller.
HabanaJoe is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.