Need Advice on Boat Offer - Four Winns U17
#11
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seems like a well kept boat from the pictures and description of the seller.
Having a hard time trying to decide whether to go Four Winns or Sweet 16...
Had not even considered the Four Winns until the seller's ad popped up on craigslist the other day.
I think both may be priced outside my budget at this time anyway.
Having a hard time trying to decide whether to go Four Winns or Sweet 16...
Had not even considered the Four Winns until the seller's ad popped up on craigslist the other day.
I think both may be priced outside my budget at this time anyway.
#14
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They do really well in the rough since they have the 24 degree deadrise hull. Very similar to the Donzi Sweet 16/Classic 18.
Either your guy didn't know how to drive the boat, it had a problem or you were in EXTREMELY rough seas which a 17 foot boat is not intended for.
They ride great.
#15
Registered
Did the guy driving the boat know how to handle it?
They do really well in the rough since they have the 24 degree deadrise hull. Very similar to the Donzi Sweet 16/Classic 18.
Either your guy didn't know how to drive the boat, it had a problem or you were in EXTREMELY rough seas which a 17 foot boat is not intended for.
They ride great.
They do really well in the rough since they have the 24 degree deadrise hull. Very similar to the Donzi Sweet 16/Classic 18.
Either your guy didn't know how to drive the boat, it had a problem or you were in EXTREMELY rough seas which a 17 foot boat is not intended for.
They ride great.
Just curious what do you cosider rough water?
#16
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's common sense not to expect a 17 foot boat to handle 6 foot seas but maybe that was your expectation or something...
#17
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Grosse Pointe Farms, MI
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I agree. I considered buying a 22' Donzi, but I couldn't see running on the Great Lakes, so I figured what's the point? IMO you need something with more freeboard if you want to run it in rough water.
#18
Registered
No the U-17 is NOT good in a 3-4 foot chop. I doubt you have been in a U-17 in a 3' foot chop. A 1-2' chop probably feels like 3-4 but no way a U-17 handles a 3-4' chop good. So what you are saying, the u-17 handles a chop that is 2-3 times the freeboard of the boat well??? Think about that again. Can it handle a 3' wake from a passing cruiser? Sure it can, power through it, get a bit of air and continue on. But there just simply is not enough of that boat in the water to handle a sustained 3-4' chop.
Last edited by low_psi; 03-24-2011 at 03:08 PM.
#19
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South N.J
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#20
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No the U-17 is NOT good in a 3-4 foot chop. I doubt you have been in a U-17 in a 3' foot chop. A 1-2' chop probably feels like 3-4 but no way a U-17 handles a 3-4' chop good. So what you are saying, the u-17 handles a chop that is 2-3 times the freeboard of the boat well??? Think about that again. Can it handle a 3' wake from a passing cruiser? Sure it can, power through it, get a bit of air and continue on. But there just simply is not enough of that boat in the water to handle a sustained 3-4' chop.
Here's a vid (Not mine) of a U-17 running in moderate chop. It's always hard to tell how big seas are in videos so I won't speculate but it gives you an idea of how the boat handles in moderately rough seas.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzOUGTFxF0Q
We'll agree to disagree on the subject. It is certainly not a boat to be afraid of and handles as well or better than most in it's class/size.