Surface Drives on Cats, Why Not???
09-06-2010, 02:13 PM
#71
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Casa De Kappy
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pat was working with the Victory team on what---the Number Six Drive from Mercury?
Comment:
I recall Fred Keikhaefer putting out a press release on what the Weismann involvement was with the Number six drive. The drive was designed by Fred at his Aeromarine business which was bought out by Mercury. It was a wet sump drive at the time.
The Weismann involvement was how to dry sump the drive NOT design it completely. Also the No. 6 drive is not a complete dry sump drive if I recall the lower is still in oil with no spray bar or remote tank.
Anyway that is grinding the axe there have been numerous threads on this topic.
What did you change on your setup did you go up...increase set back or was it simply prop changes.
We will be heading out in two days I'm gonna put some hours on the meter real quick
. I'm also gonna try my hand at video here real quick.
KAP
I was racing with SBI and USO when the SSM#6 got dry sumped, and I recall that info (Weismann, this is who Mercury Racing contracted to design the dry sump system for the SSM#6.) coming from MR, but I guess anything is possible.
After changing (fixing) the set-up last summer 2009, it became real dependable. My Skater has about 125 hours on it, and once the FMO (Ft Myers Offshore) season starts up (Oct-April), I will put some hours on her. Each run for me is an average of 150 miles.
After changing (fixing) the set-up last summer 2009, it became real dependable. My Skater has about 125 hours on it, and once the FMO (Ft Myers Offshore) season starts up (Oct-April), I will put some hours on her. Each run for me is an average of 150 miles.
I recall Fred Keikhaefer putting out a press release on what the Weismann involvement was with the Number six drive. The drive was designed by Fred at his Aeromarine business which was bought out by Mercury. It was a wet sump drive at the time.
The Weismann involvement was how to dry sump the drive NOT design it completely. Also the No. 6 drive is not a complete dry sump drive if I recall the lower is still in oil with no spray bar or remote tank.
Anyway that is grinding the axe there have been numerous threads on this topic.
What did you change on your setup did you go up...increase set back or was it simply prop changes.
We will be heading out in two days I'm gonna put some hours on the meter real quick
. I'm also gonna try my hand at video here real quick.KAP
09-06-2010, 02:39 PM
#72
Gold Member
Gold Member
Pat was working with the Victory team on what---the Number Six Drive from Mercury?
Comment:
I recall Fred Keikhaefer putting out a press release on what the Weismann involvement was with the Number six drive. The drive was designed by Fred at his Aeromarine business which was bought out by Mercury. It was a wet sump drive at the time.
The Weismann involvement was how to dry sump the drive NOT design it completely. Also the No. 6 drive is not a complete dry sump drive if I recall the lower is still in oil with no spray bar or remote tank.
Anyway that is grinding the axe there have been numerous threads on this topic.
What did you change on your setup did you go up...increase set back or was it simply prop changes.
We will be heading out in two days I'm gonna put some hours on the meter real quick. I'm also gonna try my hand at video here real quick.
KAP
Comment:
I recall Fred Keikhaefer putting out a press release on what the Weismann involvement was with the Number six drive. The drive was designed by Fred at his Aeromarine business which was bought out by Mercury. It was a wet sump drive at the time.
The Weismann involvement was how to dry sump the drive NOT design it completely. Also the No. 6 drive is not a complete dry sump drive if I recall the lower is still in oil with no spray bar or remote tank.
Anyway that is grinding the axe there have been numerous threads on this topic.
What did you change on your setup did you go up...increase set back or was it simply prop changes.
We will be heading out in two days I'm gonna put some hours on the meter real quick
. I'm also gonna try my hand at video here real quick.KAP
FYI: The next boat I build, will include discussions with Rik from Arneson, as well as some non MR power options.
09-06-2010, 02:57 PM
#73
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Beautiful Fort Lauderdale www.cheetahcat.com
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Pat was working with the Victory team on what---the Number Six Drive from Mercury?
Comment:
I recall Fred Keikhaefer putting out a press release on what the Weismann involvement was with the Number six drive. The drive was designed by Fred at his Aeromarine business which was bought out by Mercury. It was a wet sump drive at the time.
The Weismann involvement was how to dry sump the drive NOT design it completely. Also the No. 6 drive is not a complete dry sump drive if I recall the lower is still in oil with no spray bar or remote tank.
Anyway that is grinding the axe there have been numerous threads on this topic.
What did you change on your setup did you go up...increase set back or was it simply prop changes.
We will be heading out in two days I'm gonna put some hours on the meter real quick. I'm also gonna try my hand at video here real quick.
KAP
Comment:
I recall Fred Keikhaefer putting out a press release on what the Weismann involvement was with the Number six drive. The drive was designed by Fred at his Aeromarine business which was bought out by Mercury. It was a wet sump drive at the time.
The Weismann involvement was how to dry sump the drive NOT design it completely. Also the No. 6 drive is not a complete dry sump drive if I recall the lower is still in oil with no spray bar or remote tank.
Anyway that is grinding the axe there have been numerous threads on this topic.
What did you change on your setup did you go up...increase set back or was it simply prop changes.
We will be heading out in two days I'm gonna put some hours on the meter real quick
. I'm also gonna try my hand at video here real quick.KAP
09-06-2010, 04:46 PM
#74
Banned
Either way, my point in referencing Weismann and the SSM#6 dry sump was, that the teams at places like Arneson, Weismann, Ilmor and some others have great engineering, awesome products and supper support. I think they should be considered when building or upgrading hi-perf boats.
FYI: The next boat I build, will include discussions with Rik from Arneson, as well as some non MR power options.
FYI: The next boat I build, will include discussions with Rik from Arneson, as well as some non MR power options.
09-06-2010, 05:40 PM
#75
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Casa De Kappy
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Either way, my point in referencing Weismann and the SSM#6 dry sump was, that the teams at places like Arneson, Weismann, Ilmor and some others have great engineering, awesome products and supper support. I think they should be considered when building or upgrading hi-perf boats.
FYI: The next boat I build, will include discussions with Rik from Arneson, as well as some non MR power options.
FYI: The next boat I build, will include discussions with Rik from Arneson, as well as some non MR power options.
I agree with what you wrote above.
I have also found great prototype products where the inventor or the company never really completed the development stages for X or Y reasons.
In addition, I have had several experiences wherein the company failed to follow through with support on really great surface drive systems. You can have great engineering and an awesome product but it don't mean squat. If you do not have customer support that is business 101. I can recall during the testing period of a system and all I could think of was this is going to transform the marine drive industry...then a year later I woke up and it was just a short lived dream/illusion.
In the big picture of things the cat hull is the perfect platform for surface drives in twin engine configurations. [Note: I exculuded the single engine boats as they are in a class unto themselves]
The pros are all there for twin engine inboard cats. I cannot see any cons to setting up a go fast catamaran hull any other way. One need only look at the big diesels to go fast turbines the drive of choice for most performance boaters is the surface drive.
KAP
P.S. I love outboards but the sound of a BBC is far sweeter from docks to fly-bys
.
09-06-2010, 10:38 PM
#76
09-07-2010, 08:03 AM
#78
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: EASTON MA.
Posts: 6,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a 32B Skater with Arnesons. They work extremely well. No disadvantage. Rik stands behind Arneson, and its quality. Arneson and BPM both use a stainless prop shaft. The number 6 is a monel steel shaft with a chrome plated coating. You see the coating cracking off and taking out the seal is the norm on the 6. You need to replace the prop shafts or splay weld a stainless collar.
The only disadvantage with the surface drive is getting the motor low enough in the boat.
The only disadvantage with the surface drive is getting the motor low enough in the boat.
Last edited by AIR TIME; 09-07-2010 at 10:39 AM.
09-07-2010, 12:24 PM
#79
Mecury Shaft Drive?
Why has mercruiser not come out with their own version of a shaft drive? It seems with their resources and the fact that its a pretty simple design, they could gain customers instead of losing them...
09-07-2010, 05:02 PM
#80
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Casa De Kappy
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No money in it! Why because a quality surface drive keeps right on running for hours with little if any breakage.
Mercury makes more money selling parts for Bravos than they ever do for the entire unit with motor. If you argue this point look at how many Bravo build shops are in business to this day.
It is called the parts annuity plan...to be a subscribing member you just need a performance boat and voila your a contributor
.KAP
