![]() |
Fastest Skater with equal power?
I see quite a few new Skater's with 1075s being built. Just curious what is the fastest? 32, 36, 368, 388, 40? How about acceleration?
|
ttt
|
I would assume the smaller / lighter boats (32's on your list) would be the fastest, assuming the water is calm enough and all other things being equal.
|
Originally Posted by SS930
(Post 3234658)
I would assume the smaller / lighter boats (32's on your list) would be the fastest, assuming the water is calm enough and all other things being equal.
|
I remember someone saying a 36 is faster then the 32 with equal power
|
I am thinking the fastest hull with equal power is the 388.
|
Originally Posted by mastercraft240
(Post 3234707)
I remember someone saying a 36 is faster then the 32 with equal power
|
Originally Posted by Brad Zastrow
(Post 3234713)
I am thinking the fastest hull with equal power is the 388.
|
Then again you cannot forget about the 32", BAD, boat. Vinny and Jimmy have run some big numbers with this boat. But it may be the exception to the rule.
Julie |
I would be shocked if a 38 would out run a 32 with all things being equal and the water conditions were well suited to the 32.
|
From the Skater website, models with 850's:
32 140MPH+ 36 120-125MPH+ 368 140MPH+ 40 135MPH No numbers given on the 388 |
Interesting...that 36 is a slow poke:lolhit::boat:
|
Originally Posted by Tsunami LC
(Post 3234764)
From the Skater website, models with 850's:
32 140MPH+ 36 120-125MPH+ 368 140MPH+ 40 135MPH No numbers given on the 388 |
I'd say the 388 is the ticket!
|
Originally Posted by dkwestern
(Post 3234898)
True. However Flight Clubs 36 hit 140 with 850's. Skaters #'s on the website seem to be off a bit.
|
Originally Posted by Tsunami LC
(Post 3234764)
From the Skater website, models with 850's:
32 140MPH+ 36 120-125MPH+ 368 140MPH+ 40 135MPH No numbers given on the 388 The info on their website, is terrible at best. The insurance companies won't even use it for reference. http://smiliesftw.com/x/hsugh2.gif The 368 & 388 are "supposed" to be the fastest all around hulls, but since they are all 99% custom built, there could be an exception to the rule at every size, depending on the setup. http://smiliesftw.com/x/hsughno.gif |
What did the 32 with Merc 850's run from the Miami boat show in '04 or '05?? Yellow boat, tested in PRA mag I believe.
I also read on here (for ref) that a 368 with Merc 600's/#6 drives ran 127, out east. |
Originally Posted by BLee
(Post 3234937)
The info on their website, is terrible at best. The insurance companies won't even use it for reference. http://smiliesftw.com/x/hsugh2.gif
The 368 & 388 are "supposed" to be the fastest all around hulls, but since they are all 99% custom built, there could be an exception to the rule at every size, depending on the setup. http://smiliesftw.com/x/hsughno.gif There was a 388 1075 boat at LOTO, that Blume semed to know. |
I would think that the additional tunnel width & length of the 36 & 388 would make up for the weight disadvantage & then again layup comes into play. The results might also differ if you were comparing boats w/ 850's then compared the same 2 boats w/ 1000+ hp. There's obviously an minimum / optimum HP to weight ratio for each model & IMO once surpassed there maybe diminishing returns meaning the bigger HP will benefit the larger boats more than the smaller ones.
|
Originally Posted by NASCAT
(Post 3235060)
I would think that the additional tunnel width & length of the 36 & 388 would make up for the weight disadvantage & then again layup comes into play. The results might also differ if you were comparing boats w/ 850's then compared the same 2 boats w/ 1000+ hp. There's obviously an minimum / optimum HP to weight ratio for each model & IMO once surpassed there maybe diminishing returns meaning the bigger HP will benefit the larger boats more than the smaller ones.
Like I said, I think all things being equal the 32 will be faster (in the proper conditions). With that said, obviously the bigger boats have a huge advantage once the conditions get rougher... |
Originally Posted by SS930
(Post 3235214)
Again, this is why I was saying the 32, with all things being equal. Comparing a custom light layup 368 or 388 to a 'production' 32 is not apples to apples IMO. Now if you're talking about a custom 368 vs a custom 328 with equal build/options/features, now I think we're talking apples to apples.
Like I said, I think all things being equal the 32 will be faster (in the proper conditions). With that said, obviously the bigger boats have a huge advantage once the conditions get rougher... |
Originally Posted by SS930
(Post 3235214)
Again, this is why I was saying the 32, with all things being equal. Comparing a custom light layup 368 or 388 to a 'production' 32 is not apples to apples IMO. Now if you're talking about a custom 368 vs a custom 328 with equal build/options/features, now I think we're talking apples to apples.
Like I said, I think all things being equal the 32 will be faster (in the proper conditions). With that said, obviously the bigger boats have a huge advantage once the conditions get rougher... That's pretty darn efficient. Then you've got the 388's with big power running 188 +. I'd say that's a hard combo to beat. |
Originally Posted by NASCAT
(Post 3235226)
All things aren't ever going to be equal since the tunnels on larger boats are longer & wider, nor will they weigh the same. My understanding is that no 2 flat deck boats are the same either, there is no template or fixture & Peter cuts them all himself.
if things were able to be equal, physics says the smaller / lighter boats would be faster. but there are a lot of things going on besides length and weight. |
Originally Posted by Gladhe8er
(Post 3234768)
Interesting...that 36 is a slow poke:lolhit::boat:
|
Originally Posted by NASCAT
(Post 3235226)
All things aren't ever going to be equal since the tunnels on larger boats are longer & wider, nor will they weigh the same. My understanding is that no 2 flat deck boats are the same either, there is no template or fixture & Peter cuts them all himself.
It's not fair to say an ultra light lay-up 36 with the tunnel widened 8" is faster than a plain Jane 32 with the std tunnel/lay-up, therefore a 36 is faster than a 32. That's horse sh!t. Comparing a light weight 368 or 388 or a canopy boat to a std 32 is not comparing apples to apples! These boats have had the tunnel widened over the std model, are lighter, and possibly even a canopy! If you make the same mods on a 32 (328) so that both have equally widened tunnels with the same lay-up and areo, the 32 becomes much more efficient... just like the 36 and 38 do when you widen them 8", lightened, and a canopy is added. Doing like mods to both and given the same amount of development/setup, the 32 will be faster. With that said, I'd rather own the 36/38 all day long, but that wasn't the question. ;) |
I've had an ultralight carbon cut down 328 ob race boat and now have an all carbon Kevlar cut down 32 with 710 ilmors and #6's, if I put my power and drives on a 36, 368, or 388 with the same layup and deck those 3 would be faster. End of story. The 36, 368, and 388 are more efficient hulls. Don't shoot the messenger . Ps this is the 4 th skater I've personally owned, and I used to race a 36 triple ob boat (snake man) as well.
|
Originally Posted by SS930
(Post 3235410)
Exactly. So going back to the OP's question, which is going to be faster? Let's compare like models and modifications.
It's not fair to say an ultra light lay-up 36 with the tunnel widened 8" is faster than a plain Jane 32 with the std tunnel/lay-up, therefore a 36 is faster than a 32. That's horse sh!t. Comparing a light weight 368 or 388 or a canopy boat to a std 32 is not comparing apples to apples! These boats have had the tunnel widened over the std model, are lighter, and possibly even a canopy! If you make the same mods on a 32 (328) so that both have equally widened tunnels with the same lay-up and areo, the 32 becomes much more efficient... just like the 36 and 38 do when you widen them 8", lightened, and a canopy is added. Doing like mods to both and given the same amount of development/setup, the 32 will be faster. With that said, I'd rather own the 36/38 all day long, but that wasn't the question. ;) Count me out b/c I already own a Skater & ordering 2 more would leave me w/ 3 which simply wouldn't make sense.:drink: |
Originally Posted by NASCAT
(Post 3235428)
Lets face it this thread is never going to amount to anything more than bench racing UNLESS one of you order 2 boats from Peter w/ the same power & specifications that SRE is inquiring about.:party-smiley-004:
|
Originally Posted by flight club
(Post 3235365)
That's Funny. My old 36 ( Bacardi Silver ) is still to this date the fastest piston powered boat with a 202 mph
BTW, I wanted to thank your club for the tremendous hangover I had this morning. LOL |
Originally Posted by NASCAT
(Post 3235428)
Lets face it this thread is never going to amount to anything more than bench racing UNLESS one of you order 2 boats from Peter w/ the same power & specifications that SRE is inquiring about.:party-smiley-004:
Count me out b/c I already own a Skater & ordering 2 more would leave me w/ 3 which simply wouldn't make sense.:drink: |
Originally Posted by sre
(Post 3235758)
I really like what you did with that boat. It turned out awesome!
BTW, I wanted to thank your club for the tremendous hangover I had this morning. LOL |
Originally Posted by flight club
(Post 3235869)
ANYTIME. LOL. Make sure you come next friday for our Halloween Party. 200 strippers in THEIR wildest costumes.
|
A std layup 2004 36' canopy skater with 525's , 8800 lbs, 1.50 ratio # 6 drives has gone 124 mph on the limiters. A bigger wheel should squeek a couple more mph, but that is still a very sweet speed for the power.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.